Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 56, September 2013, Pages 382-391
Biomass and Bioenergy

Salinity based allometric equations for biomass estimation of Sundarban mangroves

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Total biomass was found to be higher in Sonneratia apetala in western Sundarbans.

  • AGB and BGB of Avicennia alba and Excoecaria agallocha were higher in central Sundarbans.

  • The two sectors are drastically different with respect to salinity.

  • Significant impact of salinity was observed on total biomass of selected species.

  • Allometric equations for biomass are species-specific and not site-specific.

Abstract

Biomass estimation was carried out for three even-aged dominant mangrove species (Avicennia alba, Excoecaria agallocha and Sonneratia apetala) in two regions of Indian Sundarbans with two distinct salinity regimes for three consecutive years (2008–2010) and the results were expressed in tons per hectare (t ha−1). In the western region, the total mean biomass of the mangrove species varied as per the order A. alba (41.65 t ha−1 in 2008, 55.79 t ha−1 in 2009, 60.86 t ha−1 in 2010) > S. apetala (31.76 t ha−1 in 2008, 32.81 t ha−1 in 2009, 39.10 t ha−1 in 2010) > E. agallocha (13.89 t ha−1 in 2008, 15.54 t ha−1 in 2009, 18.28 t ha−1 in 2010). In the central region, the order was A. alba (42.06 t ha−1 in 2008, 57.09 t ha−1 in 2009, 64.57 t ha−1 in 2010) > E. agallocha (15.30 t ha−1 in 2008, 20.02 t ha−1 in 2009, 24.24 t ha−1 in 2010) > S. apetala (6.77 t ha−1 in 2008, 9.46 t ha−1 in 2009, 11.42 t ha−1 in 2010). Significant negative correlation was observed between biomass of S. apetala and salinity (p < 0.01), whereas in case of A. alba and E. agallocha positive correlations were observed (p < 0.01). Species-wise linear allometric regression equations for biomass prediction were developed for each salinity zone as a function of diameter at breast height (DBH) based on high coefficient of determination (R2 value). The allometric models are species-specific, but not site-specific.

Introduction

Mangroves are a taxonomically diverse group of salt-tolerant, mainly arboreal, flowering, plants that grow primarily in tropical and subtropical regions [1]. Estimates of mangrove area vary from several million hectares (ha) to 150,000 km2 worldwide [2]. The most recent estimates suggest that mangroves presently occupy about 14,653,000 ha of tropical and subtropical coastline [3]. The field survey of mangrove biomass and productivity is rather difficult due to muddy soil conditions and the heavy weight of the wood. The peculiar tree form of mangroves, especially their unusual roots, has attracted the attention of botanists and ecologists [4]. Allometric equations for mangroves have been developed for several decades to estimate biomass and subsequent growth. Most studies have used allometric equations for single stemmed trees, but mangroves sometimes have multi-stemmed tree forms, as often seen in Rhizophora (Garjan), Avicennia (Baen), and Excoecaria (Gewan) species [5], [6] that often create difficulty in developing allometric equations with accuracy. Clough et al. [5] showed that the allometric relationship can be used for trunks in a multi-stemmed tree. Moreover, for dwarf mangrove trees, allometric relationships have been used to estimate the biomass [7]. Basically the dwarfness of mangroves is caused due to high salinity. Presence of salt is a critical factor for the development of mangrove ecosystems. At lower intensities it favors the development of mangroves eliminating more vigorous terrestrial plants which other wise could compete with. On the contrary at increased level it might cause overall degradation of mangroves. Salinity is also a controlling factor for mangrove seedling recruitment and the relation is negatively proportional. Siddiqi [8] noted reduced recruitment of Heritiera fomes (Sundari) and Excoecaria agallocha seedling in the Sundarbans mangrove forest with increased salinity. Ball and Pidsley [9] observed adverse impact of increased salinity on canopy development, leaf initiation, and leaf area expansion in Sonneratia alba (Sada Keora) and Sonneratia lanceolata (Keora).

In the maritime state of West Bengal, situated in the northeast coast of India, the adverse impact of salinity on the growth of mangrove species has been documented [10], [11]. Salinity, therefore, greatly influences the overall growth and productivity of the mangroves [12]. The Indian Sundarbans exhibits two significantly different salinity regimes due to siltation that prevent the flow of Ganga–Bhagirathi–Hooghly water to the central region. This has made the ecosystem a unique test bed to observe the impact of salinity on the biomass and allometric trait of the mangrove species.

Section snippets

The study area

The Sundarban mangrove ecosystem covering about 10,000 km2 in the deltaic complex of the Rivers Ganga, Brahmaputra and Meghna is shared between Bangladesh (62%) and India (38%) and is the world's largest coastal wetland. Enormous load of sediments carried by the rivers contribute to its expansion and dynamics.

A unique spatial variation in terms of hydrological parameters is observed in Indian part of Sundarbans. The western region of the deltaic lobe receives the snowmelt water of Himalayan

Relative abundance

A total of seventeen species of mangroves were recorded in the selected plots of the study area. It is observed that stations 4 (Lothian island), 5 (Prentice island) and 7 (Sajnekhali) exhibited relatively more species diversity compared to other stations. This may be attributed to magnitude of anthropogenic pressure, intense human activities or salinity profile of the area. On the basis of relative abundance the species Sonneratia apetala, E. agallocha and Avicennia alba were found dominant in

Discussion

The development and functioning of mangrove ecosystem is regulated by salinity. Salinity affects plant growth in a variety of ways: 1) by limiting the availability of water against the osmotic gradient, 2) by reducing nutrient availability, 3) by causing accumulation of Na+ and Cl in toxic concentration causing water stress conditions, enhancing closure of stomata and reduced photosynthesis [20].

The impact of salinity in the deltaic Sundarbans is significant since it controls the distribution

Conclusion

Finally we list a few of our core findings:

  • The Indian Sundarbans sustains luxuriant mangrove vegetation and a total of 17 species in association were recorded from the plots of selected stations.

  • Contrasting salinity profile exists in the deltaic complex, which is primarily regulated by barrage discharge and siltation.

  • The waters in the western river (Hooghly) are freshening due to barrage discharge, but the central river (Matla) and its adjacent habitat is hypersaline owing to siltation that has

Acknowledgments

The financial assistance from the Ministry of Earth Science, Govt. of India (Sanction No. MoES/11-MRDF/1/34/P/08, dated 18.03.2009), is gratefully acknowledged.

References (43)

  • M.C. Ball et al.

    Growth responses to salinity in relation to distribution of two mangrove species, Sonneratia alba and Sonneratia lanceolata in Northern Australia

    Funct Ecol

    (1995)
  • A. Mitra et al.
  • S. Das et al.

    The mangroves and mangrove forest of Bangladesh

    (1985)
  • A.B. Chaudhuri et al.

    Mangroves of the Sundarbans–India

    (1994)
  • A. Mitra et al.

    Pulse of climate change in Indian Sundarbans: a myth or reality?

    Natl Acad Sci Lett

    (2009)
  • B. Husch et al.

    Forest mensuration

    (1982)
  • E.N. Chidumaya

    Aboveground woody biomass structure and productivity in a Zambezian woodland

    For Ecol Manage

    (1990)
  • C.S. Bledsoe et al.

    Measurement of static root parameters: biomass, length, and distribution in the soil profile

  • K. Grasshoff et al.

    Methods of seawater analysis

    (1999)
  • Unesco

    The practical salinity Scale 1978 and the international equation of state of seawater 1980

    Techn Pap Mar Sci

    (1981)
  • Jalil A. Md

    Impact of salinity on the growth of Avicennia officinalis and Aegicerus corniculatum

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text