Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 33, Issue 21, July 2012, Pages 5287-5296
Biomaterials

Characterization of natural, decellularized and reseeded porcine tooth bud matrices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Dental tissue engineering efforts have yet to identify scaffolds that instruct the formation of bioengineered teeth of predetermined size and shape. Here we investigated whether extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules present in natural tooth scaffolds can provide insight on how to achieve this goal. We describe methods to effectively decellularize and demineralize porcine molar tooth buds, while preserving natural ECM protein gradients. Natural tooth ECM composition was assessed using histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of fibrillar and basement membrane proteins. Our results showed that Collagen I, Fibronectin, Collagen IV, and Laminin gradients were detected in natural tooth tissues, and retained in decellularized samples. Second harmonic generation (SHG) image analysis and 3D reconstructions were used to show that natural tooth tissue exhibited higher collagen fiber density, and less oriented and less organized collagen fibers, as compared to decellularized tooth tissue. We also found that reseeded decellularized tooth scaffolds exhibited distinctive collagen content and organization as compared to decelluarized scaffolds. Our results show that SHG allows for quantitative assessment of ECM features that are not easily characterized using traditional histological analyses. In summary, our results demonstrate the potential for natural decellularized molar tooth ECM to instruct dental cell matrix synthesis, and lay the foundation for future use of biomimetic scaffolds for dental tissue engineering applications.

Introduction

Current efforts in whole tooth tissue engineering focus on identifying methods to accurately control bioengineered tooth size and shape, create functional tooth roots, and eliminate ectopic mineralized tissue formation in in vivo implanted bioengineered tooth and bone constructs. To date, strategies for tooth tissue engineering have utilized a variety of scaffold materials, growth factors, and cell sources, achieving some level of success [1], [2], [3], [4]. We hypothesized that detailed characterizations of extracellular matrix (ECM) composition and organization in natural tooth development could facilitate human tooth tissue engineering efforts. Evidence in support of this includes the fact that amelogenin and its associated natural cleavage products have been shown to direct the proper self-assembly of enamel crystals into microribbons [5], and that biglycan decorated nanofiber scaffolds can induce amelogenin expression and subsequent enamel formation and maturation [6], [7], [8]. These and other reports indicate that functional characterizations of tooth expressed ECM molecules, including their respective developmental and spatial organization, may facilitate the design of effective scaffolds for tooth regeneration.

Based on the fact that the ECM provides morphogenetic cues that guide proper cellular interactions during natural and bioengineered organogenesis, recent reports have focused on elucidating roles for natural ECM molecules and gradients in craniofacial tissues and organs [9], [10], [11]. In the tooth bud, dental epithelial and dental mesenchymal cell layers develop into enamel and pulp organs, respectively. As the tooth matures, dental mesenchymal cells differentiate into odontoblasts and secrete a matrix that eventually mineralizes to form dentin, and dental epithelial cells differentiate into ameloblasts, which secrete an enamel matrix. To date, the fabrication of biomimetic scaffolds that support robust dentin and enamel formation in a predictable manner remains an elusive goal. Recently, tissue decellularization methods have been used to preserve natural tissue-specific ECM composition and spatial organization, creating acellular scaffolds for a variety of tissue and organ engineering applications [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. In this study, we first devised non-destructive decellularization and demineralization methods to process natural porcine tooth buds, and then compared ECM protein expression patterns present in natural and processed tooth buds using histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) approaches.

In addition, we employed second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging to obtain quantitative information about collagen content, organization, and remodeling in natural and processed tooth scaffolds. SHG is a non-linear scattering process that monitors the interaction of two photons with molecules that lack centrosymmetry, resulting in the scattering of a single photon at half the wavelength [18]. This process requires a high density photon beam that is typically available only at the focal point emanating from a microscope objective [18]. Thus, it offers intrinsic optical sectioning capabilities in three dimensions, and enables micron-level resolution imaging of tissues extending over a few hundred microns in depth. Based on the fact that fibrillar collagens are non-centrosymmetric structures that provide intrinsic SHG contrast, avoiding the need to stain or process specimens prior to imaging, numerous studies have used SHG imaging to assess collagen organization and structure in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro [19], [20], [21], [22]. SHG microscopy is often performed simultaneously with two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) imaging [21], [22], [23], another non-linear imaging process involving the simultaneous absorption of two low energy photons, resulting in the excitation and emission of a single higher energy fluorescent photon upon decay to the ground state [24]. Certain chromophores within cells such as NADH and FAD, and proteins including collagen and elastin, are natural fluorophores. The combined use of SHG and TPEF allows for non-invasive evaluation of cellular and ECM components of tissues, and can be used to assess their interactions during normal or diseased tissue development [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26].

Here we report the characterization of natural ECM molecules and fibrillar proteins present in natural and processed tooth bud tissues. IHC, SHG, and TPEF were used to define ECM molecule gradients, collagen fiber content, and 3D organization in natural tooth tissues, processed decellularized and demineralized samples, and in processed tooth scaffolds reseeded and cultured with dental mesenchymal cells. Our long term goal is to apply knowledge gained from these studies to fabricate instructive biomimetic tooth scaffolds that promote the formation of engineered tooth and bone constructs of specified size and shape, for future applications in craniofacial tissue engineering [27], [28], [29].

Section snippets

Decellularization and decalcification of porcine molar tooth buds

All reagents were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise specified. Recently discarded 5 ½ month old pig jaws were obtained following USDA guidelines. Second and third molar tooth buds (M2 and M3, respectively) were harvested from hemi-split jaws, rinsed thoroughly in PBS, and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) overnight, and decellularized based on published formulations [30], [31]. Briefly, harvested M2 and M3 tooth buds were rinsed in Hank's Balanced

Morphology and gross anatomy of natural and decellularized M2 tooth buds

Decellularization efficiency was evaluated in dental pulp tissues of decellularized and control samples (Fig. 1A, boxed region). Reduced numbers of nuclei were apparent in H&E stained specimens after 1, 2, and 5 cycles of detergent treatment (Fig. 1B–D) as compared to untreated natural control tissue (Fig. 1E). After two cycles, nuclei were still detected in Method I and II treated samples (Fig. 1B–C), while no nuclei were detected in Method III treated samples. Five detergent cycles removed

Discussion

Recent efforts in tooth tissue engineering have focused on creating bioengineered teeth and supporting structures, using post natal cells harvested from dental pulp and periodontal tissues [2], [29]. We have previously demonstrated the successful generation of bioengineered tooth and bone tissues, generated from porcine and rat tooth bud cells seeded onto PGA/PLGA [27], [28], [29], [39], and silk fibroin scaffolds [40]. Our currently used bioengineered tooth scaffolds lack ECM molecule

Conclusions

Here, we have described reliable methods to decellularize and demineralize composite hard and soft dental tissues, and to characterize these tissues using both traditional histological, immunohistochemical and state-of-the-art non-linear microscopic methods. These studies describe, for the first time, distinct extracellular matrix molecular gradients in early stage tooth structures We also demonstrate the use of SHG imaging to analyze heterogeneous tooth organ tissues, and describe a systematic

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Leah Bellas for lyophilizing the samples prior to PicoGreen analysis and Weibo Zhang for expert histological training and advice. We also thank Stephen Badylak and Steven Tottey for expert advice on DNA isolation and quantification. This work was funded by NIH R01DE016132 (PCY), NSF BES0547292 (IG, NF), NIH RO1EB007542 (IG, NF), and NIH P41 EB002520 (Tissue Engineering Resource Center).

References (53)

  • R.M. Williams et al.

    Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen i fibrils

    Biophys J

    (2005)
  • Z. Wu et al.

    The use of phospholipase a(2) to prepare acellular porcine corneal stroma as a tissue engineering scaffold

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • M.J. Honda et al.

    Tooth-forming potential in embryonic and postnatal tooth bud cells

    Med Mol Morphol

    (2008)
  • Y.C. Li et al.

    Cementum and periodontal ligament-like tissue formation induced using bioengineered dentin

    Tissue Eng Part A

    (2008)
  • K. Nakao et al.

    The development of a bioengineered organ germ method

    Nat Methods

    (2007)
  • E.L. Scheller et al.

    Tissue engineering: state of the art in oral rehabilitation

    J Oral Rehabil

    (2009)
  • C. Du et al.

    Immunogold labeling of amelogenin in developing porcine enamel revealed by field emission scanning electron microscopy

  • Z. Huang et al.

    Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2008)
  • D.M.H. Tenorio et al.

    Distribution of biglycan and decorin in rat dental tissue

  • X. Wen et al.

    Biglycan overexpression on tooth enamel formation in transgenic mice

    Anat Rec

    (2008)
  • M. Larsen et al.

    Cell and fibronectin dynamics during branching morphogenesis

    J Cell Sci

    (2006)
  • R.I. Manabe et al.

    Transcriptome-based systematic identification of extracellular matrix proteins

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • H.C. Ott et al.

    Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung

    Nat Med

    (2010)
  • W.L. Grayson et al.

    Effects of initial seeding density and fluid perfusion rate on formation of tissue-engineered bone

    Tissue Eng Part A

    (2008)
  • H.C. Ott et al.

    Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart

    Nat Med

    (2008)
  • T.H. Petersen et al.

    Tissue-engineered lungs for in vivo implantation

    Science

    (2010)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Tooth Repair and Regeneration: Potential of Dental Stem Cells

      2021, Trends in Molecular Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      One possible solution was to use natural tooth bud extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds created from decellularized postnatal tooth buds (dTBs) to guide bioengineered tooth formation of specified size and shape [71]. This approach was based on previous studies showing that gentle decellularization processes could safely be used to remove immunogenic components from whole organs and tissues while maintaining the natural ECM and its signaling components [72]. Based on the successful use of decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) scaffolds for applications in regenerative medicine, dTB-ECM scaffolds were created from postnatal porcine tooth buds, and then reseeded with porcine DE cells and human DPSCs, as well as with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to facilitate revascularization.

    • Fabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering

      2020, Applied Materials Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      dECM obtained from tissue or organ after removing of all cellular components by using various methods. Various organs dECMs includes dECM dermis [187], pancreas [188], ovaries [189], bone/bone marrow [190], tracheas [191], tooth buds [192], kidney [193], heart valves [194], pancreas [195], liver [37], brain [196] cartilage [197], lungs [198], hearts [199], vascular grafts [200], esophagus [201], bladder and intestine [202]. dECM is widely used in tissue engineering however, several challenges associated with dECM including sterilization, immunogenicity/biodegradation, metabolic demand, bioreactors, cell number and placement, and cell infiltration [37].

    • Scaffolds for engineering tooth-ligament interfaces

      2019, Handbook of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Volume One
    • Dental Tissue Engineering

      2018, Principles of Regenerative Medicine
    • Tooth tissue engineering

      2017, Biomaterials for Oral and Dental Tissue Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text