Elsevier

Biological Control

Volume 51, Issue 3, December 2009, Pages 475-479
Biological Control

Effect of parasitism on flight behavior of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.08.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Many aphid species possess wingless (apterous) and winged (alate) stages, both of which can harbor parasitoids at various developmental stages. Alates can either be parasitized directly or can bear parasitoids eggs or larvae resulting from prior parasitism of alatoid nymphs. Winged aphids bearing parasitoid eggs or young larvae eventually still engage in long-distance flights, thereby facilitating parasitoid dispersal. This may have a number of important implications for biological control of aphids by parasitoids. In this study, we determined the effect of parasitism by Aphelinus varipes (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) on wing development and flight of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae). We also quantified the influence of aphid flight distance on subsequent A. varipes development. Parasitism by A. varipes was allowed at different A. glycines developmental stages (i.e., alatoid 3rd and 4th-instar nymphs, alates) and subsequent aphid flight was measured using a computer-monitored flight mill. Only 35% of aphids parasitized as L3 alatoid nymphs produced normal winged adults compared to 100% of L4 alatoids. Flight performance of aphids parasitized as 4th-instar alatoid nymphs 24 or 48 h prior to testing was similar to that of un-parasitized alates of identical age, but declined sharply for alates that had been parasitized as 4th-instar alatoid nymphs 72 and 96 h prior to testing. Flight performance of aphids parasitized as alate adults for 24 h was not significantly different from un-parasitized alates of comparable ages. Flight distance did not affect parasitoid larval or pupal development times, or the percent mummification of parasitized aphids. Our results have implications for natural biological control of A. glycines in Asia and classical biological control of the soybean aphid in North America.

Introduction

Insect natural enemies that are transported by host or non-host organisms can contribute to biological control. For example, entomopathogenic nematodes are distributed by non-host organisms, ensuring a broad geographical coverage and associated control of multiple insect pests (Eng et al., 2005, Campos-Herrera et al., 2006). Phoretic egg parasitoids belonging to the families Trichogrammatidae and Scelionidae attach to mobile adult stages of insect pests and consequently enhance geographic distribution of the parasitoid (Arakaki et al., 1996, Buschman and Whitcomb, 1980, Fatouros et al., 2005, Orr, 1988). The dispersal of parasitoids through flight of their host could aid the recovery of natural enemy populations in frequently disturbed or highly-dynamic systems (Rauwald and Ives, 2001), and likely contributes to more effective arthropod biological control, especially in the case of highly mobile insect pests.

One highly mobile pest is the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, a key insect pest of soybeans in North America (Ragsdale et al., 2004, Wu et al., 2004b). Although A. glycines was first reported in the North-Central US in 2000, it has rapidly spread throughout the principal soybean production regions of the US and Canada (Ragsdale et al., 2004, Ragsdale et al., 2007, Venette and Ragsdale, 2004). The spread of A. glycines in North America is facilitated by both passive and active flight (Venette and Ragsdale, 2004, Zhang et al., 2008). While the distance flown by A. glycines is not known, the existence of long-distance flight is indicated by frequent capture of winged A. glycines far from either soybeans or the overwintering host of A. glycines, Rhamnus spp. shrubs (G.E. Heimpel, unpublished). Other migratory aphids can be carried by the wind for up to hundreds of kilometers (Elton, 1925, Kring, 1972, Irwin and Thresh, 1988, Riley et al., 1995, Zhu et al., 2006).

Classical biological control is currently being implemented against A. glycines (Heimpel et al., 2004b) including releases of the exotic parasitoid Binodoxys communis (Hymenoptera: Aphidiinae) in several US states (Wyckhuys et al., 2007). Additionally, other aphid parasitoids including various Aphelinus species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) have either been experimentally released against soybean aphid or are being considered for potential future releases (Heimpel et al., 2004a, Wu et al., 2004a, Heraty et al., 2007, Wyckhuys et al., 2007). For future releases, priority will be given to Aphelinus spp. with narrow host range, high A. glycines control potential and presence of selected behaviors that may aid their subsequent establishment or geographical spread.

Field-caught alate aphids are frequently infested with aphid pathogens or immature parasitoids, with parasitized alates yielding viable parasitoid mummies (Feng et al., 2004, Feng et al., 2007, Chen et al., 2008). Koinobiont parasitoids, including all aphid parasitoids, allow movement and growth of the host upon parasitism, potentially permitting flight of parasitized aphids over considerable distances provided that the alate stage bears parasitoid offspring (Feng et al., 2007, Chen et al., 2008). However, certain aphid parasitoids disrupt the formation of host wings, impeding subsequent host flight (Christiansen-Weniger and Hardie, 1998, Christiansen-Weniger and Hardie, 2000, Rauwald and Ives, 2001, Demmon et al., 2004). Little is known about how A. glycines parasitism affects subsequent aphid wing development and flight performance.

Here, we investigate the effects of parasitism by Aphelinus varipes on flight capacity of alate A. glycines using a laboratory flight mill (Zhang et al., 2008, Zhang et al., 2009). We determine the effect of parasitism on aphid wing development and we compare flight performance of alate A. glycines that were parasitized at different times during their development.

Section snippets

Study insects

A laboratory colony of A. glycines was initiated with individuals collected from a soybean field in Beijing, China in July 2006. The colony was maintained on soybean plants at 25 °C, 75% RH and 16:8-h L:D. Soybeans were planted in potting soil in plastic containers and were transplanted as seedlings into 100 ml glass bottles filled with a nutrient solution (Wu and Liu, 1994). Plants were changed every three days. Alatoid nymphs (i.e., nymphal instars with wing-pads) were collected from aphid

Influence of parasitism on A. glycines wing development

Among aphids that were parasitized as L3 alatoid nymphs, 20% developed into apterous mummies, 45% into mummies with deformed or partly formed wings, and 35% into alate mummies. Among aphids parasitized as L4 alatoid nymphs, 100% turned into alate mummies. Aphids parasitized as L3 alatoids were significantly less likely to fully develop wings than those parasitized as L4 alatoids (χ2 = 24.3; p < 0.05).

Effect of parasitism on A. glycines flight

Flight performance parameters of aphids parasitized in the L4 alatoid stage are shown in Table 1.

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that A. varipes is likely to be transported by A. glycines under certain conditions. Parasitized aphids engaged in long-distance flights when parasitism occurred during the 4th-instar nymphal or alate stages. Also, parasitism by A. varipes only disrupts A. glycines wing development when aphids are parasitized as 3rd-instar nymphs. Lastly, A. glycines flight did not have any effects on development of “passenger” A. varipes.

Parasitoid-induced interference of wing

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Dengfa Cheng (Institute of Plant protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing) for providing the aphid flight-mill. This research was supported by financial assistance from National Natural Science Foundation of China (30625028), Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2006CB102007), and NCSRPC and USDA RAMP funding.

References (45)

  • D. Cheng et al.

    A computer-monitored flight mill system for tiny insects such as aphids

    Acta Entomologica Sinica

    (1997)
  • P. Christansen-Weniger

    Morphological observations on the preimaginal stages of Aphelinus varipes (HYM., Aphelinidae), and the effects of this parasitoid on the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi (HOM., Aphididae)

    Entomophaga

    (1994)
  • P. Christiansen-Weniger et al.

    Wing development in parasitized male and female Sitobion fragariae

    Physiological Entomology

    (1998)
  • A.S. Demmon et al.

    Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) increases its adult size by disrupting host wing development

    Environmental Entomology

    (2004)
  • C.S. Elton

    The dispersal of insects to Spitzbergen

    Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    (1925)
  • W.F. Fagan et al.

    Invasion theory and biological control

    Ecology Letters

    (2002)
  • N.E. Fatouros et al.

    Butterfly anti-aphrodisiac lures parasitic wasps

    Nature

    (2005)
  • M. Feng et al.

    Aphid dispersal flight disseminates fungal pathogens and parasitoids as natural control agents of aphids

    Ecological Entomology

    (2007)
  • M. Feng et al.

    Wide dispersal of aphid-pathogenic Entomophthorales among aphids relies upon migratory alates

    Environmental Microbiology

    (2004)
  • G.E. Heimpel et al.

    Gut sugar analysis in field-caught parasitoids: adapting methods originally developed for biting flies

    International Journal of Pest Management

    (2004)
  • G.E. Heimpel et al.

    Prospects for importation biological control of the soybean aphid: anticipating potential costs and benefits

    Annals of Entomological Society of America

    (2004)
  • K.R. Hopper et al.

    Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions

    Ecological Entomology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text