Novel protein interactors of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.08.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been implicated in tumor growth and metastasis. The crystal structure of uPAR revealed that the external surface is largely free to interact with a number of proteins. Additionally, due to absence of an intracellular cytoplasmic protein domain, many of the biological functions of uPAR necessitate interactions with other proteins. Here, we used yeast two-hybrid screening of breast cancer cDNA library to identify hSpry1 and HAX1 proteins as putative candidate proteins that interact with uPAR bait constructs. Interaction between these two candidates and uPAR was confirmed by GST-pull down, co-immunoprecipitation assays and confocal microscopy. These novel interactions that have been identified may also provide further evidence that uPAR can interact with a number of other proteins which may influence a range of biological functions.

Research highlights

► Screening of breast cancer cDNA library identified novel uPAR candidate proteins. ► hSpry1 interaction with uPAR has been identified and confirmed. ► Novel interaction between uPAR and HAX1 has also been recognized.

Introduction

The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has a well described role in extracellular matrix (ECM) proteolysis, and other important functions in cell growth, adhesion, migration and invasion [1]. These latter additional roles are influenced by the ability of uPAR to engage in multiple protein–protein interactions [2]. In addition to the primary ligand uPA that binds to uPAR, there are two further ligands, which have been found to bind uPAR. These are vitronectin (VN) [3], and kininogen [4]. Furthermore, uPAR is linked to the cell membrane via a GPI anchor, and so has no intracellular domain [5]. Hence, many of the biological functions of uPAR necessitate interactions with other proteins on the cell surface, in particular, transmembrane proteins. The high lateral mobility of uPAR on the cell membrane may provide the mechanism by which it associates with other transmembrane receptors [6]. Indeed, the recent crystal structure of the soluble form of uPAR was solved at 2.7 Å in association with a competitive peptide inhibitor of the uPA–uPAR interaction [7]. The proposed model for the uPA/uPAR interaction revealed uPA bound to uPAR via a central cavity. This model left the external receptor surface free to bind and interact with other proteins [7].

In addition to the primary ligand uPA, a number of uPAR specific interactions have also been identified and are consistent with the varied roles regulated by uPAR including cell adhesion, cell migration, angiogenesis, apoptosis and cancer metastasis. Indeed, there is now evidence that uPAR can bind with the cell surface β1, β2, β3, β5 and β6 integrin subfamilies members [8], [9], [10], [11]. Other associations and physical binding partners include chemotactic receptors [12], the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [13], α2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein [14], GP130 [15], the mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor [16], and Mrj [17]. However, it is believed that there should be other unidentified proteins that interact with uPAR.

The amino acid sequence of uPAR has three repeats, approximately 90 amino acids each, suggesting the existence of three homologous independently folded domains. These have been designated DI, DII and DIII from the N-terminal end [18]. These three domains are homologous to the Ly6/neurotoxin family and have two short linker regions between DI and DII, as well as, DII and DIII. Loop 3 of DI and in particular, the amino acid Arg53, Leu55, Tyr57 and Leu66 are important in the ligand binding of uPA [19], [20]. Chymotrypsin can cleave uPAR in the linker region between DI and DII at residue 87 and uPA similarly cleaves at residue 84 to result in a cleaved form of uPAR [21]. There is also soluble uPAR (suPAR) that may be either the full-length receptor or a truncated form consisting of only DII and DIII [22]. In the present work, we have used yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) to identify novel interacting proteins by utilizing a number of alternate bait constructs based on uPAR. The screening of a breast cancer cDNA library identified hSpry1 and HAX1 proteins as novel candidate proteins that interact with uPAR. These novel protein–protein interactions were confirmed by GST-pull down, co-immunoprecipitation assays and confocal microscopy.

Section snippets

Materials, vectors and yeast strains

The yeast vectors pGBD-B and pACT2-B and yeast strains PJ69-4A and PJ69-4α were kindly provided by Dr. David Markie (Dunedin School of Medicine, New Zealand). Dr. Dafna Bar-Sagi, (State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA), kindly provided the pCGN/hSpry1 vector. The pGEM®-3Zf (+)-HAX1 vector was kindly provided by Dr. Maria Olsson (InsGöteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden). Dr. Ying Wei (University of California, San Francisco, CA,

Yeast two-hybrid screening

In this study, five different uPAR baits, full-length uPAR-DIDIIDIII, uPAR-DIIDIII, uPAR-DIII, uPAR-DII and uPAR-DI were used in the Y2H screening of a breast carcinoma cDNA library of novel candidate proteins that may interact with uPAR (Fig. 1). All prey clones sequences passed two rounds of screening in an attempt to minimize clonal specific false positives. Positive clones were sequenced and identified using BLASTN (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) (Table 1). For uPAR-DIIDIII, a prey

Discussion

The Y2H system has been successfully used here to identify a number of putative proteins that interact with different domain forms of uPAR, in particular for uPAR-DIDIIDIII, uPAR-DIIDIII and uPAR-DI. Of the putative candidates identified, hSpry1 and HAX1 were further investigated. The Sprouty family are negative regulators of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), by influencing their duration and intensity of signaling [26]. The diverse role of the Sprouty family has recently been reviewed [27].

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Ph.D. scholarships to A.H. Mekkawy from the Ministry of Higher Education, Egypt and to C.E. De Bock from the Foundation for Research Science and Technology, New Zealand.

References (42)

  • P. Li et al.

    Role of urokinase plasminogen activator and its receptor in metastasis and invasion of neuroblastoma

    J. Pediatr. Surg.

    (2004)
  • P.A. Andreasen et al.

    Plasminogen activator inhibitor from human fibrosarcoma cells binds urokinase-type plasminogen activator, but not its proenzyme

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1986)
  • A.H. Mekkawy et al.

    Urokinase plasminogen activator system as a potential target for cancer therapy

    Future Oncol.

    (2009)
  • R.W. Colman

    Role of the light chain of high molecular weight kininogen in adhesion, cell-associated proteolysis and angiogenesis

    Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • H.T. Myöhänen et al.

    Distribution and lateral mobility of the urokinase-receptor complex at the cell surface

    J. Histochem. Cytochem.

    (1993)
  • P. Llinas et al.

    Crystal structure of the human urokinase plasminogen activator receptor bound to an antagonist peptide

    EMBO J.

    (2005)
  • M.V. Carriero et al.

    Urokinase receptor interacts with αvβ5 vitronectin receptor, promoting urokinase-dependent cell migration in breast cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (1999)
  • W. Xue et al.

    Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptors associate with beta 1 and beta3 integrins of fibrosarcoma cells: dependence on extracellular matrix components

    Cancer Res.

    (1997)
  • M. Resnati et al.

    Specific immunofluorimetric assay detecting the chemotactic epitope of the urokinase receptor (uPAR)

    PNAS

    (2002)
  • A. Nykjaer et al.

    Recycling of the urokinase receptor upon internalization of the uPA:serpin complexes

    EMBO J.

    (1997)
  • N. Tkachuk et al.

    Urokinase induces survival or pro-apoptotic signals in human mesangial cells depending on the apoptotic stimulus

    Biochem. J.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (15)

    • MAGP2 induces tumor progression by enhancing uPAR-mediated cell proliferation

      2022, Cellular Signalling
      Citation Excerpt :

      P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Previously, we found that MAGP2 may directly interact with uPAR through yeast two-hybrid experiments (data not shown) [16]. To investigate this interaction, we conducted a pull-down experiment in 293 T cells, in which prokaryotically expressed GST-uPAR was used as the bait protein and the empty GST protein was used as a negative control.

    • Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-mediated regulation of WNT/β-catenin signaling is enhanced in irradiated medulloblastoma cells

      2012, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although uPAR has been implicated to exist in the nucleus, the functional role of uPAR in the nucleus is not clear. Furthermore, the role of uPAR in angiogenesis, inflammation, wound repair, and tumor progression/metastasis (42–45) is due to its ability to engage in multiple protein/protein interactions (46–50). Because uPAR is devoid of a transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain, we anticipated that association of uPAR with β-catenin would involve other interlinking molecules.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    2

    Present address: Cancer Research Unit, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.

    3

    Present address: The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.

    View full text