Research reportBasal activity level in mice predicts the initial and sensitized locomotor response to nicotine only in high responders
Introduction
In humans, not all drug users progress from drug-taking to addiction, with only a small percentage reaching the clinical criterion for a diagnosis of drug dependence [1]. Thus it is critical to determine the factors that lead some individuals to compulsive drug-taking behaviors. In recent years much preclinical research has been devoted to identifying risk factors to predict subsequent drug responding, many of which have been based on measures of locomotor activity. Alterations in locomotor activity in response to drugs of abuse in animals, such as the development of behavioral sensitization, have long been suggested to model the neurobiological adaptations that induce drug craving following drug use in humans [2], [3], [4], especially changes in mesocorticolimbic dopamine circuits that underlie both sensitization and the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse and drug-associated cues [5], [6].
Previous studies have examined differences in a variety of measurements based on the initial locomotor responsiveness to psychostimulants such as cocaine. For example, Allen et al. [7] demonstrated that only rats classified as low responders (LCRs) based on their acute locomotor response to cocaine developed locomotor sensitization in response to repeated injections, while high responders (HCRs) failed to sensitize to the locomotor activating effects of cocaine. Furthermore, LCRs and HCRs have been shown to differ in both intravenous cocaine CPP [7] and cocaine self-administration [8], with only LCRs exhibiting CPP, and LCRs demonstrating increased responding under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Thus, LCRs demonstrated an increased sensitivity to the stimulant effects of cocaine, consistent with an increase in sensitivity to cocaine as measured using CPP and self-administration.
Another locomotor activity-based model used to identify susceptibility to subsequent increased drug responding is that of novelty-induced locomotion. An enhanced exploration in novel environments has been suggested to predict vulnerability to drugs of abuse. For example, rats classified as high responders based on their performance in a novel environment demonstrated an increased acute response to amphetamine as compared to low responders [9]. Furthermore, adult mice classified as high and low novelty seekers based on their performance in a novel environment task demonstrated differences in the ability of a sub-threshold dose of cocaine (1 mg/kg) to elicit a CPP, with high novelty seekers demonstrating a preference for a cocaine-paired environment following conditioning, but no preference in the low novelty seekers [10]. Rats classified as high responders to novelty have also been demonstrated to learn to self-administer cocaine faster, and self-administer more cocaine, than their low responder counterparts [11]. Thus, novelty-seeking can be an effective predictor of subsequent drug responses.
Although susceptibility to the abuse of psychostimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine has been examined, few studies have sought to characterize behavioral predictors of nicotine dependence, despite tobacco use being a substantial health problem and the leading risk factor in preventable deaths worldwide. For example, Pastor et al. [12] examined whether the acute locomotor response to nicotine would affect the subsequent establishment of a nicotine CPP in rats classified as either low or high nicotine responders. The authors demonstrated that in low responders, pre-exposure to nicotine failed to induce a CPP following a conditioning regimen that normally results in a conditioned preference (four nicotine exposures), and only showed CPP after extensive conditioning sessions (seven nicotine exposures). In contrast, high nicotine responders failed to show a preference at any conditioning regimen. Thus, pre-exposure to nicotine resulted in an impairment in reinforcement that was greater in high responders. In contrast, rats classified as high responders based on novelty-induced locomotion demonstrated more reliable nicotine self-administration and a higher break point than their low responder counterparts [13]. Thus, the ability to predict subsequent nicotine responding based on differences in the acute locomotor response to the drug or novelty-induced locomotion remains unclear.
The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of basal locomotor activity to predict the acute and sensitized locomotor response to nicotine in animals classified as having low and high basal activity. We also employed a sub-threshold conditioning procedure to assess the effects of nicotine pre-exposure on nicotine CPP in animals separated based on their initial basal locomotor activity level.
Section snippets
Subjects
Male C57Bl/6N mice (Charles River, Germany) aged 10–14 weeks old at the start of experiments served as subjects. Mice were single-housed in a temperature-controlled (21 °C) environment maintained on a 12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 6 a.m.). Food and water was available ad libitum. All experiments were performed in accordance with EU guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the local animal care committee (Regierungspräsidium, Karlsruhe, Germany). All
Locomotor activity
Acute nicotine (0.5 mg/kg) induced a locomotor depression when administered a day following measurement of basal locomotor activity. Fig. 1A shows the mean (±SEM) distance traveled (cm) during the 60-min sessions measuring basal locomotion and the acute response to nicotine. A paired t-test revealed a significant decrease in locomotor activity following nicotine administration, as compared to basal locomotor activity measured during the previous day [t(19) = 9.2, p < .001].
In a subsequent analysis,
Discussion
Here we demonstrate that basal locomotor activity in mice predicts both the acute and sensitized locomotor response to nicotine, but only in mice classified as having high basal locomotor activity. This is the first demonstration of basal locomotor activity as a predictor of nicotine responding, and one of few to demonstrate differences in responding based on separation into subpopulations in mice. We also used a sub-threshold nicotine conditioning paradigm to determine, based on previous
Conflict of interest statement
We report no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
RB was supported by a grant from the ‘Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft’ (DFG, SPP1226, SP 383/4-1).
References (23)
- et al.
From first drug use to drug dependence: developmental periods of risk for dependence upon marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol
Neuropsychopharmacology
(2002) - et al.
The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Brain Res Brain Res Rev
(1993) - et al.
Cocaine-induced alterations in dopamine receptor signaling: implications for reinforcement and reinstatement
Pharmacol Ther
(2005) - et al.
Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague–Dawley rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(2007) - et al.
High novelty-seeking predicts greater sensitivity to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(2012) - et al.
The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred high-responder and low-responder rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(2008) - et al.
The ClockDelta19 mutation in mice fails to alter the primary and secondary reinforcing properties of nicotine
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2013) - et al.
Individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior but not in anxiety response to a new environment can predict nicotine consumption in adolescent C57BL/6 mice
Behav Brain Res
(2006) - et al.
Anxiety-like behavior during nicotine withdrawal predict subsequent nicotine consumption in adolescent C57BL/6 mice
Behav Brain Res
(2008) - et al.
Early smoking initiation and nicotine dependence in a cohort of young adults
Drug Alcohol Depend
(1993)
Post-conditioning propranolol disrupts cocaine sensitization
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
Cited by (16)
Drug-free and context-dependent locomotor hyperactivity in DBA/2 J mice previously treated with repeated cocaine: Relationship with behavioral sensitization and role of noradrenergic receptors
2019, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Additional factors not evaluated in our study, such as baseline locomotion, can also influence sensitization and/or conditioned effects of drugs. Bernardi and Spanagel (2014), for example, found that C57BL/6 N mice with high basal locomotor activity scores were particularly sensitive to the psychomotor-sensitizing effects of nicotine. Future experiments will need investigate whether basal locomotion levels are associated with drug-free conditioned hyperlocomotion in cocaine-sensitized animals.
Sex differences in the acute locomotor response to methamphetamine in BALB/c mice
2017, Behavioural Brain ResearchIndividual differences in the behavioral effects of nicotine: A review of the preclinical animal literature
2015, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :As detailed earlier, the evidence is mixed as to whether reactivity to an inescapable novel environment predicts the subsequent behavioral effects of nicotine. While some studies have found that reactivity to an inescapable novel environment predicts the later effects of nicotine (Aydin et al., 2011; Aydin et al., 2012; Bernardi and Spanagel, 2014; Bhatti et al., 2009; Pehrson et al., 2008; Philpot et al., 2012; Suto et al., 2001), others have found no relation (Besheer and Bevins, 2000; Bevins and Besheer, 2001; Coolon and Cain, 2009; Guillem et al., 2005; Pastor et al., 2013; Prus et al., 2008). Who knows how many other studies were never published because of null effects.
Sex differences in dopamine binding and modafinil conditioned place preference in mice
2015, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Sessions are monitored via a video-tracking system (Ethovision 2.0, Noldus, the Netherlands) that determines spatial placement within sessions and distance traveled (cm). CPP was assessed using a biased design, as previously described (Bernardi and Spanagel, 2013, 2014a). Briefly, animals were conditioned to modafinil in their non-preferred environment, in three phases: pre-test, conditioning, and post-test.
Effect of chronic vapor nicotine exposure on affective and cognitive behavior in male mice
2024, Scientific Reports