ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Behavioural Brain Research
Volume 164, Issue 1, 14 October 2005, Pages 29-35
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (150 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.05.006    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Research report

Seahorse wins all races: Hippocampus participates in both linear and non-linear visual discrimination learning

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Ira Driscolla, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Sarah R. Howarda, Glen T. Pruskya, Jerry W. Rudyb and Robert J. Sutherlanda, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aCanadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alta., Canada T1K 3M4

bDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado, Muenzinger D244, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, USA


Received 24 February 2005; 
revised 11 May 2005; 
accepted 11 May 2005. 
Available online 15 July 2005.

Abstract

Consistent with configural/conjunctive theories of the hippocampus, we report that rats trained on the non-linear transverse patterning discrimination problem (A+ versus B−, B+ versus C−, and C+ versus A) displayed retrograde amnesia when the hippocampus was later damaged. They also failed to relearn the solution to this problem. Damage to the hippocampus following training also produced retrograde amnesia in rats trained on a set of elemental discrimination problems (A+ versus B−, C+ versus D−, and E+ versus F−) that could be solved based on the associative strengths of the individual choice cues. However, in contrast to transverse patterning, rats easily relearned and retained these elemental problems and learned a new set of elemental problems after the damage. These results support two theoretical conclusions: (a) elemental discriminations can be learned by both a system that depends on the hippocampus and a system that does not require the hippocampus, and (b) in the intact animal these two systems competitively interact with the hippocampal-dependent system inhibiting memory formation by the extra-hippocampal system.

Keywords: Transverse patterning; Hippocampus; Amnesia; Discrimination learning

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animals
2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Visual water task
2.3. Design and procedure
2.3.1. Surgery
2.3.2. Histology
2.4. Discrimination training procedures
2.4.1. Overview
2.4.2. Elemental discriminations
2.4.3. Transverse patterning
3. Results
3.1. Histology
3.2. Elemental discriminations
3.3. Transverse patterning
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References





Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 403 394 3981; fax: +1 403 329 2775.

Behavioural Brain Research
Volume 164, Issue 1, 14 October 2005, Pages 29-35
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.