Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Is coherent motion an appropriate test for magnocellular sensitivity?
Accepted 19 December 2005.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
The suggestion that coherent motion may serve as a test of magnocellular sensitivity is problematic. However, the nature of the problems depends on how the “magnocellular system” is defined. If this term is limited to subcortical entities, the problems are that subcortical neurons are not directionally selective, and that their receptive fields are too small to account for the spatial summation of coherent motion. If “magnocellular system” is defined to include cortical entities, such as area MT, one is faced with the fact that this definition itself is problematic as well as the problem that area MT is known to receive parvocellular and koniocellular inputs.
Keywords: Magnocellular; Random dots; Movement; Parvocellular; Koniocellular; Area MT; Motion perception; Vision; Dyslexia
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Direct relationship between the magnocellular system and coherent motion
- 2.1. Direction selectivity
- 2.2. Area of integration
- 2.3. Lesions studies
- 2.4. Effects of flicker and red backgrounds
- 3. Indirect relationship between coherent motion and the magnocellular system
- 3.1. Parvocellular and koniocellular input to area MT
- 3.2. Two (or more?) motion systems
- 3.3. Contrast sensitivity
- 4. Further observations
- 5. Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References






E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (12)






