Brief paperSignal shaper with a distributed delay: Spectral analysis and design☆
Introduction
Input shaping is a control technique for reducing vibrations in computer controlled flexible machines by smoothing the reference command. Significant filtering features of simple time-delay shapers were first reported by Smith, 1957, Smith, 1958 and applications for effective manipulation and control of flexible systems were immediately proposed. In the 1990s, Singer, Seering and Singhose revisited the concept of delay-based signal shapers, see e.g. Singer and Seering (1990), and Singhose, Seering, and Singer (1994). They developed alternative methodology and time-domain formulas for the Smith’s posicast (Smith, 1957) resulting in the concept of zero-vibration (ZV) shaper. These results were followed by modifications with improved robustness, particularly the zero-vibration-derivative (ZVD) shaper and extra insensitive (EI) shaper (Singhose, Crain, & Seering, 1997). Particular simple shapers are the starting point for multi-modes shapers tuned to two or more selected flexible modes (Cole, 2011, Hyde and Seering, 1991, Singhose and Sung, 2009, Tuttle and Seering, 1994). Next to the shaper design and analysis in continuous time domain, an extensive research has been devoted to discrete signal shapers, see e.g. Hyde and Seering (1991), Tuttle and Seering (1994), Magee and Book (1993), Baumgart and Pao (2007), Cole (2011) and Cole and Wongratanaphisan (2011). Robustness analysis of classical shapers is discussed, e.g. in Singer and Seering (1990), Gurleyuk and Cinal (2007), Vaughan, Yano, and Singhose (2008) and Hurák, Hromčík, and Spiller (2007). Input shapers have proved most useful in many projects related to controls for flexible devices like reference tracking for flexible manipulators and cranes (Kim & Singhose, 2010), vibration suppression of industrial robots (Park et al., 2006, Pereira et al., 2009), orientation and pointing of solar panels of satellites (Singhose, Derezinski, & Singer, 1996), to name a few. Next to the signal shaping, various command profiles, such as trapezoidal, S-curve, and even more complex functions can be used to smooth the rapid changes in the reference or input signals of flexible systems, see e.g. Meckl, Arestides, and Woods (1998). However, as shown in Singhose, Eloundou, and Lawrence (2010) by applying the theory of signal shapers, the input shaping is considerably faster and more efficient technique in reducing the vibrations compared to the command smoothing.
In this paper, the novel zero-vibration shaper with a distributed delay is introduced as the main result. After the preliminary Section 2, the novel shaper is proposed in Section 3. Next, its spectral features are analyzed, resulting in the parameter design procedure. Consequently, comparison of the classical ZV shaper and the novel shaper is performed. In Section 4, the discretization issues of the shaper are addressed. Residual vibration characteristics are given in Section 5 and the results summary can be found in Section 6. Let us remark that the preliminary results have been presented in the brief conference paper (Vyhlídal, Kučera, & Hromčík, 2012).
Section snippets
Zero vibration shaper
Consider the objective to compensate a single oscillatory mode of a system where are system input and output, respectively. Let the undesirable oscillatory mode be represented by the natural frequency and the damping ratio , determining the complex conjugate couple of system poles . An example of a system under consideration is as follows For the oscillatory mode compensation purpose, we can use the classical ZV
Main result—zero vibration shaper with an equally distributed delay
Substituting the lumped delay in the ZV shaper (2) by the delay (7), the distributed zero-vibration (DZV) shaper can be defined as Consequently, its transfer function is given by Let us remark that various types of delay distribution can be considered instead of (7). However, the use of more complex distribution functions may result in difficulties regarding their implementation, as shown e.g. in Verriest (1999).
Discrete implementation of the DZV shaper
For the purpose of the DZV shaper implementation, we propose its discretization scheme. As the preliminary step, consider the state space implementation of the DZV shaper transfer function (9) as follows where is the state.
With the objective to keep the discretized algorithm as simple as possible, we apply the Euler explicit discretization scheme to (19), which results in where is discrete time and is the
Residual vibration characteristics
Robustness of the connection of a shaper and a system with respect to the ratio between the nominal (design) natural frequency and the true natural frequency can be visualized by the sensitivity curves (Singer and Seering, 1990, Singhose and Sung, 2009). Based on the comparison of step responses of the system (1) given by , and the shaper–system connection given by , the residual vibration sensitivity function can be defined as
Conclusions
As the main contribution, the novel DZV signal shaper with an equally distributed delay and its spectrum based design have been introduced. Besides, various features of the shaper have been analyzed and compared with the classical ZV shaper. On the one hand, the DZV shaper provides slower performance in vibration suppression compared to the ZV shaper. On the other hand, it provides smoother command and better robustness at the higher frequency range. Analogously to DZV, more advanced shaper
Acknowledgments
The research benefited from discussions with professors Pavel Zítek, Nejat Olgac and Erik Verriest. We also thank to the anonymous reviewers for many valuable comments and suggestions.
Tomáš Vyhlídal was born in Dačice, Czech Republic, in 1974. He graduated in Automatic Control and Engineering Informatics in 1998 and received Ph.D. in Control and Systems Engineering in 2003, both from the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (FME), Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU). Since 2000, he has been with the Dept. of Instrumentation and Control Eng., FME-CTU, and with the Centre for Applied Cybernetics. Since 2012, he has been Professor of Systems and Control Engineering at
References (28)
- et al.
Discrete time-optimal command shaping
Automatica
(2007) A discrete-time approach to impulse-based adaptive input shaping for motion control without residual vibration
Automatica
(2011)- et al.
Performance studies of human operators driving double-pendulum bridge cranes
Control Engineering Practice
(2010) - et al.
Adaptive input shaping for manoeuvring flexible structures using an algebraic identification technique
Automatica
(2009) - et al.
Comparison of robust input shapers
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(2008) - et al.
Optimal FIR input shaper designs for motion control with zero residual vibration
Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control
(2011) - et al.
Robust three-impulse sequence input shaper design
Journal of Vibration and Control
(2007) - et al.
Trends in the stability properties of CLSS controllers: a root-locus analysis
IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology
(2010) - et al.
Minimization of l2 norm of the error signal in posicast input command shaping: a polynomial approach
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
(2007) - Hyde, J.M., & Seering, W.P. (1991). Using input command pre-shaping to suppress multiple mode vibration. In IEEE int....
Design of learning input shaping technique for residual vibration suppression in an industrial robot
IEEE/ASME Transaction on Mechatronics
Preshaping command input to reduce system vibration
ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control
Cited by (49)
A distributed delay based controller for simultaneous periodic disturbance rejection and input-delay compensation
2023, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingMinimum time control of a gantry crane system with rate constraints
2023, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingModeling and control of overhead cranes: A tutorial overview and perspectives
2023, Annual Reviews in ControlControl of a nonlinear flexure-jointed X-Y positioning stage using LTV-FIR command prefiltering for finite-time error cancellation
2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingDesign and experimental validation of a robust input shaper for eliminating vibration in dielectric elastomer actuators under varying applied voltage
2020, Sensors and Actuators, A: PhysicalCitation Excerpt :Moreover, the ZV shaper constraints at the certain frequency of single-mode system. Similar methods have been employed in DZV [26,30]. To expand the frequency control range, the DZV shaper designed with the equally distributed density function delays.
Tomáš Vyhlídal was born in Dačice, Czech Republic, in 1974. He graduated in Automatic Control and Engineering Informatics in 1998 and received Ph.D. in Control and Systems Engineering in 2003, both from the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (FME), Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU). Since 2000, he has been with the Dept. of Instrumentation and Control Eng., FME-CTU, and with the Centre for Applied Cybernetics. Since 2012, he has been Professor of Systems and Control Engineering at FME-CTU. His research interests include spectral analysis and control design of time-delay systems, algebraic control design, mathematical modeling and applied control theory. He is a member of editorial board of Kybernetika Journal.
Vladimír Kučera was born in Prague, Czech Republic, in 1985. He graduated in Cybernetics and Measurements at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU), in 2011. His master thesis focused on vibration control of large blended wing body aircraft. He is currently Ph.D. student of Control and Systems Engineering at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, CTU. He focuses on applications of delay based controllers and compensators in vibration control of mechanical systems.
Martin Hromčík was born in Ledeč nad Sázavou, Czech Republic, in 1975. He graduated in Cybernetics and Measurements in 1999 and received Ph.D. in Control Engineering and Robotics in 2005, both from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering (FEE), Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU). Since 2000, he has been with the Dept. of Control Eng., FEE-CTU. He became Assistant Professor of Control Engineering at FEE-CTU in 2009. His research interests cover flexible systems and controls, robust control, and flight control systems. He has been a member of the IFAC Technical Committee for Control Design since 2005, and of the Technical Committee for Aerospace since 2012.
- ☆
The presented research has been supported by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic under the project KONTAKT II - LH12066. The material in this paper was partially presented at the 10th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, June 22–24, 2012, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Fen Wu under the direction of Editor Roberto Tempo.
- 1
Tel.: +420 224352877.