Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 42, Issue 22, July 2008, Pages 5602-5611
Atmospheric Environment

Modeling hydrogen sulfide emissions across the gas–liquid interface of an anaerobic swine waste treatment storage system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a colorless gas emitted during decomposition of hog manure that produces an offensive “rotten egg” smell and is considered a toxic manure gas. In the southeastern United States, anaerobic waste treatment lagoons are widely used to store and treat hog excreta at commercial hog farms. Hydrogen sulfide is produced as manure decomposes anaerobically, resulting from the mineralization of organic sulfur compounds as well as the reduction of oxidized inorganic sulfur compounds by sulfur-reducing bacteria. The process of H2S emissions from anaerobic waste treatment lagoons are investigated utilizing a two-film model with three different modeling approaches: Coupled Mass Transfer with Chemical Reactions Model with the assumption (1) pH remains constant in the liquid film (MTCR Model I) and (2) pH may change throughout the liquid film due to diffusion processes that occur within the film (MTCR Model II); and (3) a Mass Transfer Model which neglects chemical reactions (MTNCR Model) in the gas and liquid films.

Results of model predictions are consistent with previous works, which show that flux is largely dependent on the physicochemical lagoon properties including sulfide concentration, pH, and lagoon temperature. Air temperature and low wind velocities (e.g., <3.25 m s−1) have negligible impact on flux. Results also indicate that flux values decrease with increased film thickness. The flux was primarily influenced by variations in the liquid film thickness, signifying that the H2S flux is driven by liquid-phase parameters. Model results were compared with H2S flux measurements made at a swine waste treatment storage lagoon in North Carolina using a dynamic emission flux chamber system in order to evaluate model accuracy in calculating lagoon H2S emissions. The MTCR Model II predicted the highest increase in emission rates as aqueous sulfide concentration was increased. The MTNCR Model showed the highest dependence on pH. All three models showed good agreement in diurnal comparison with flux measurements; however, each model significantly over predicted the measured flux rates. The MTNCR Model estimates were closest to experimental values, predicting 3–35 times the actual measured values.

Introduction

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a colorless, potentially harmful gas released from swine manure (US EPA, 2001a). It is produced as manure decomposes anaerobically, resulting from the mineralization of organic sulfur compounds as well as the reduction of oxidized inorganic sulfur compounds such as sulfate by sulfur-reducing bacteria (US EPA, 2001a). With a low odor threshold ranging from 0.0005 to 0.3 ppm (ATSDR, 2004), it is also one of the primary gases released from swine facilities that is associated with odor complaints due to its characteristic “rotten egg” smell.

Over the last few years, changes in livestock production methods in the US have led to the emergence of large-scale commercial livestock operations, substantially increasing the number of animals in geographically concentrated areas (Aneja et al., 2006). As emissions of trace gases (i.e., nitrogen and sulfur species) likely increase in parallel with the growth and consolidation of this industry, it is important to ensure that these operations do not exceed state regulatory levels for gases such as H2S.

To date, few studies have reported H2S emissions from waste storage treatment lagoons (Zahn et al., 2002; Lim et al., 2003; Blunden and Aneja, 2008). Arogo et al. (2000) studied the concentration and production of H2S from stored liquid hog waste in a laboratory experiment. Arogo et al. (1999) have investigated the effects of environmental parameters (wind speed and air temperature) and manure properties (solids content and liquid temperature) in the laboratory and developed an overall mass transfer coefficient for emission of H2S from liquid swine manure. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed a comprehensive model, WATER9, Version 2.0 (US EPA, 2001b) for estimating emissions of individual waste constituents in wastewater collection, storage, treatment, and disposal facilities.

In this study, a two-layer model of gas–liquid interchange for exchange between air and water is used to predict H2S flux across an air–water interface. The interface between the two layers is often considered a two-layer film system (Whitman, 1923; Danckwerts, 1970; Liss and Slater, 1974). The two-film layer consists of well-mixed gas and liquid films adjacent to the interface. The rate of transfer is controlled by molecular diffusion through the stagnant boundary layer.

Similar models have been developed to predict emissions of ammonia (Aneja et al., 2001), dimethyl sulfide (Aneja and Overton, 1990), sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, methane, carbon monoxide (Liss and Slater, 1974), and carbon dioxide (Quinn and Otto, 1971). It is noted that other modeling approaches may be utilized to predict gas exchange at the air–liquid interface (e.g., Danckwerts, 1970).

For comparison, three process-based models have been developed in order to predict the rates of H2S flux from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons based on different conditions in the gas and liquid films. Two coupled Mass Transfer and Chemical Reactions Models based on the concept of simultaneous mass transfer and equilibrium chemical reaction were developed. One model considers flux based on the assumption of constant pH throughout the liquid film (MTCR Model I) and a second model considers a possible pH gradient in the liquid film due to diffusion processes (MTCR Model II). A third mass transfer model considers the hydrogen sulfide concentration in the bulk gas and liquid phases, neglecting chemical reactions in the gas and liquid films (MTNCR Model). Field experiments to measure H2S emissions from an anaerobic waste treatment lagoon were previously conducted at a commercial swine finishing operation in North Carolina over each of the four predominant seasons (Blunden and Aneja, 2008). These experimental results are used to evaluate the model's accuracy in calculating lagoon H2S emissions.

Section snippets

Experimental flux measurements

Hydrogen sulfide flux measurements were made at a commercial swine finishing operation in eastern North Carolina (Blunden and Aneja, 2008). Waste from the eight on-site animal confinement houses were flushed out with recycled lagoon effluent and discharged into the anaerobic lagoon from each house approximately once per week (varying days for each house).

Hydrogen sulfide flux was measured using a dynamic flow through chamber system (Aneja et al., 2000), consisting of a fluorinated ethylene

Sensitivity analysis

The three modeling approaches provide flux dependence for hydrogen sulfide emissions on lagoon temperature, lagoon pH, and aqueous sulfide content in the lagoon as well as atmospheric environmental factors such as ambient air temperature, wind speed, and the concentration of H2S in the ambient air. Practical ranges of these parameters have been considered for the sensitivity analysis. The effect of each parameter was examined by varying the values of the parameter throughout a given range while

Conclusions

A processed-based mass transport model has been developed in an effort to predict hydrogen sulfide flux from anaerobic waste treatment systems. Different conditions were considered, resulting in three variations of the model. The MTNCR Model considers mass transport and neglects chemical reactions. Two models consider mass transport coupled with chemical reaction in the gas and liquid phases (MTCR). The MTCR Model I assumes pH to be constant for mass transport though the liquid film, while the

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research project was provided by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) as a part of the National Research Initiative (NRI) under Contract No. 2003-05360. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

References (39)

  • J. Blunden et al.

    Characterizing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine waste treatment lagoon in North Carolina

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2008)
  • D.L. Wise et al.

    Solubilities and diffusivities of oxygen in hemolyzed human blood solutions

    Biophysical Journal

    (1969)
  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 2004. Public Health Statement for Hydrogen Sulfide, Draft for...
  • A.A. Al-Haddad et al.

    Evaluation of Henry's constant for H2S in water and sewage effluents

    Journal of Environmental Science and Health A

    (1989)
  • P.L. Altman et al.

    Respiration and Circulation

    (1971)
  • V.P. Aneja et al.

    The emission rate of dimethyl sulfide at the atmospheric–oceanic interface

    Chemical Engineering Communications

    (1990)
  • V.P. Aneja et al.

    Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2000)
  • V.P. Aneja et al.

    Measurement and modelling of ammonia emissions at waste treatment lagoon–atmospheric interface

    Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

    (2001)
  • V.P. Aneja et al.

    Emerging national research needs for agricultural air quality

    EOS Transactions

    (2006)
  • J. Arogo et al.

    Mass transfer coefficient for hydrogen sulfide emission from aqueous solutions and liquid swine manure

    Transactions of the ASAE

    (1999)
  • J. Arogo et al.

    Hydrogen sulfide production from stored liquid swine manure: a laboratory study

    Transactions of the ASAE

    (2000)
  • J. Arogo et al.

    Comparing ammonium ion dissociation constant in swine anaerobic lagoon liquid and deionized water

    Transactions of the ASAE

    (2003)
  • Blunden, J., 2006. Measurements, modeling, and analysis of hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine facility in North...
  • Byler, J., Schulte, D.D., Koelsch, R.K., 2004. Odor, H2S and NH3 emisions from phototropic and non-phototropic...
  • E.L. Cussler

    Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems

    (1997)
  • P.V. Danckwerts

    Gas–Liquid Reactions

    (1970)
  • R.H. Dinius et al.

    Diffusivity of Bisulfide Ion in Aqueous Solution

    (1972)
  • W.K. Lewis et al.

    Principles of gas absorption

    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

    (1924)
  • Cited by (40)

    • A critical review on liquid-gas mass transfer models for estimating gaseous emissions from passive liquid surfaces in wastewater treatment plants

      2018, Water Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Each of the approaches above presents particular advantages and limitations. Emission models have been widely applied in the estimation of atmospheric emissions from WWTPs (Atasoy et al., 2004; Blunden et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2008; Ro et al., 2008; Rumburg et al., 2008; Santos et al., 2009; Beghi et al., 2012a; Yang et al., 2012; Glaz et al., 2016) and other types of surface impoundments containing liquid wastes (e.g., Rotz et al., 2014; Karunarathne et al., 2017), and can be used for estimating emission rates for environmental impact assessment before building a specific WWTP (Santos et al., 2009). Nevertheless, this approach still has to be fully consolidated, as clearly indicated, for instance, by Ferro and Pincince (1996a, 1996b), Gostelow et al. (2001), Blunden et al. (2008), Beghi et al. (2012a) and Santos et al. (2012).

    • Large-eddy simulations of turbulent flow structures near a quiescent liquid–gas interface for gaseous compounds emissions studies

      2017, Applied Mathematical Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      The investigation of mass transfer of soluble gases through gas–liquid interface is important for a wide variety of applications, such as the emission of odorous compounds from sewage treatment plants [1–3], the accidental release of liquid into soil [4] and the absorption of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) by the oceans [5–7].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text