Denitrification on internal carbon sources in RAS is limited by fibers in fecal waste of rainbow trout
Introduction
Recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) technology has been successfully adopted for the land-based production of salmon and trout, and the number of farms using RAS keeps on increasing (Martins et al., 2010). However, the use of RAS is often limited by the high energy demand of the systems, and by regulatory limitations on water intake and discharge. To resolve the bottleneck of water intake and discharge, nitrate levels in fish husbandry systems must be controlled. This is usually done by water refreshment, which will eventually determine the minimal water intake and discharge of a husbandry system (Timmons and Ebeling, 2007). Besides controlling nitrate levels in RAS by water refreshment, the accumulation of nitrate can also be counteracted by using denitrification reactors (Balderston and Sieburth, 1976). Denitrification is an anoxic microbial process using organic carbon to convert nitrate into nitrogen gas, generating CO2 and alkalinity (Eq. (1)). Usually, external carbon sources like methanol or acetate are used to fuel a denitrification reactor (van Rijn et al., 2006).
Stoichiometry of denitrification, using methanol as a carbon source (Tchobanoglous et al., 2004):5 CH3OH + 6 NO3− → 3 N2 + 5 CO2 + 7 H2O + 6 OH−
Some systems even use the fecal waste, which is produced within the husbandry system, as the only carbon source for denitrification (Gelfand et al., 2003, Martins et al., 2010). The advantage of using fecal waste as an internal carbon source is the concurrent reduction of the solid waste stream, of which the further treatment and disposal is often a costly process. Thus, denitrification on internal carbon sources looks like an elegant solution to reduce the water demand and waste production in RAS (Martins et al., 2010, Van Rijn et al., 2006). However, the efficiency of denitrification on internal carbon sources is usually limited by the amount of carbon available for the microbial community within a denitrification reactor (Klas et al., 2006a).
Meriac et al. (2014) showed that the carbon bioavailability in fecal waste of fish was significantly reduced by fibers originating from unpurified plant ingredients in the feed. Fibers can only be used as a carbon source by the bacteria within a denitrification reactor after hydrolysis, which is considered the rate limiting step in the degradation of organic material (Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009, Noike et al., 1985). The question arises, to which extend fecal waste with a high fiber content can be utilized within a denitrification reactor. This will become a more important issue, considering the trend for an increased substitution of fish meal with plant-based ingredients (Naylor et al., 2009).
Therefore, we designed an experiment [i] to investigate the nitrogen removal capacity of a denitrification reactor using fecal waste with a high fiber content as the only carbon source, and [ii] to determine to which extend cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in fecal waste can be utilized as a carbon source in denitrification.
Section snippets
Experimental design
Four identical RAS were used in this experiment, of which two served as control systems and two were upgraded with an upflow sludge blanket denitrification reactor. However, those four systems were part of a larger experiment, which was designed to investigate two independent research questions in a total of six RAS. The two remaining RAS were used to test a different hypothesis, and the obtained results are not included in this paper. The experiment was approved by the Ethics Commission for
Water quality, fish performance and system management
NO2–N and NO3–N levels were significantly lower in RAS with denitrification when compared to the control systems (p < 0.05, Table 4). At the end of the experiment, the average NO3–N levels in denitrification systems were 100 mg/L against 160 mg/L in the control systems (Fig. 2). No significant differences in fish performance were observed between treatments (Table 5). Systems with denitrification consumed only 87 g of bicarbonate when compared to 211 g in the controls. Analysis of the fecal waste
Water quality and management
As expected, the denitrification reactors were able to control nitrate levels in the systems. Although literature suggests that incomplete denitrification can result in the additional production of nitrite (Balderston and Sieburth, 1976), we found higher nitrite concentrations in control systems when compared with the denitrification systems. This effect cannot be explained by a net removal of nitrite in the reactors, as the NO2–N concentration in the reactor effluent was on average 0.6 ± 0.3 mg/L
Conclusions
We demonstrated successfully that an upflow-sludge blanket denitrification reactor was able to remove half of the nitrogen waste produced in RAS, by using fecal waste produced in the system as the only carbon source. Although fibers limited the bioavailability of carbon in the fecal waste, approximately half of the COD present in feces as hemicellulose and cellulose was utilized by the reactor. This study shows, that diet composition plays an integral role for the carbon budget for a
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Interreg IV A (IVA-VLANED-1.41) and Agentschap NL (IWA09022) for the funding and all contributors of the EM-MARES and AquaVlan project consortia.
References (24)
- et al.
Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass
Bioresour. Technol.
(2009) - et al.
A comparison between methods used to determine the energy content of feed, fish and faeces samples
Aquaculture
(1986) - et al.
Conceptual, stoichiometry-based model for single-sludge denitrification in recirculating aquaculture systems
Aquaculture
(2006) - et al.
Development of a single-sludge denitrification method for nitrate removal from RAS effluents: lab-scale results vs. model prediction
Aquaculture
(2006) - et al.
New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: a perspective on environmental sustainability
Aquac. Eng.
(2010) - et al.
Dietary carbohydrate composition can change waste production and biofilter load in recirculating aquaculture systems
Aquaculture
(2014) - et al.
End-of-pipe denitrification using RAS effluent waste streams: effect of C/N-ratio and hydraulic retention time
Aquac. Eng.
(2013) - et al.
Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review
Bioresour. Technol.
(2002) - et al.
Comparison of chromic oxide, crude fibre, polyethylene and acid-insoluble ash as dietary markers for the estimation of apparent digestibility coefficients in rainbow trout
Aquaculture
(1984) - et al.
Anaerobic treatment of intensive fish culture effluents: digestion of fish feed and release of volatile fatty acids
Aquaculture
(1995)
Denitrification in recirculating systems: theory and applications
Aquac. Eng.
Pyrolysis of lignin extracted from prairie cordgrass, aspen, and Kraft lignin by Py-GC/MS and TGA/FTIR
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
Cited by (12)
Performance on horizontal flow and folded plate denitrification bioreactor recycling waste sawdust and municipal sludge for continuously treating simulated agricultural surface runoff
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Natural cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin are often used as natural solid carbon sources in denitrification bioreactors because they not only slowly release the carbon source for the survival of microorganisms, but also serve as carriers for the attachment of microorganisms (Feng et al., 2013). In previous studies, discarded newspaper (Boussaid et al., 1996), barley straw (Healy et al., 2011), five kinds of natural cellulose materials (reed leaf, cattail leaf, camphor leaf, pine branch and rice straw) (Li et al., 2013), fecal waste (Meriac et al., 2014), rice straw (Tao et al., 2019), industrial potato residues (Sepideh et al., 2020) and high-tannin oak woodchips (Wickramarathne et al., 2021)were used as solid carbon sources for denitrification bioreactor to remove nitrogen from wastewater. Only wood-particle products (e.g. woodchip and sawdust) is used as carbon source in denitrifying bioreactor, which can continuously produce carbon for 5–15 years to supply the survival of microorganisms (Schipper et al., 2010).
Emerging scope, technological up-scaling, challenges and governance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) production in Himalayan region
2020, AquacultureCitation Excerpt :The production of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum 1792) is practiced in different production systems which are mostly extensive system (ES), however, recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) can be used for intensive trout production (Samuel-Fitwi et al., 2013). Since extensive trout production systems practiced in India is based on limited requirements of resource and hence subsequent output and emissions may not impact the environment (Meriac et al., 2014). Nevertheless, intensifying trout culture may possibly impact the environment besides adequate usage of water and resources as feed.
Dietary ingredient composition alters faecal characteristics and waste production in common carp reared in recirculation system
2019, AquacultureCitation Excerpt :Impact of alternate ingredients on the digestibility of nutrients in fish has been reported by many studies. However, information on the impact of ingredient composition of the diet on the chemical composition of faeces is scarce, except for some specific studies focusing on waste management in relation to diet composition (Meriac et al., 2014a, 2014b; Davidson et al., 2013). This experiment showed that, the composition of the faeces strongly varied in carp fed the different diets.
Treatment of aquaculture effluent with Chlorella vulgaris and Tetradesmus obliquus: The effect of pretreatment on microalgae growth and nutrient removal efficiency
2019, Ecological EngineeringCitation Excerpt :While this has been carried out in aquaculture systems using various external carbon sources (van Rijn et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2015), their use comes with an additional cost. A possible solution is the use of sludge from the RAS itself as a carbon source and, thus, reduce sludge and nitrate concomitantly (Meriac et al., 2014; Suhr et al., 2014), yet this approach achieves no resource recovery and thus no added value is obtained. Microalgae-based technologies are a promising solution for aquaculture wastewater treatment (Egloff et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2016; Posadas et al., 2015; Van Den Hende et al., 2014a) and the microalgae biomass obtained can be valorised (Barnharst et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2013; Milhazes-Cunha and Otero, 2017).
Novel tri-bore PVDF hollow fiber membranes for the control of dissolved oxygen in aquaculture water
2019, Journal of Water Process EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Another method is to convert nitrate through a biological process named as denitrificaiton. Denitrification depends on facultative heterotrophic bacteria which reduces nitrate NO3− to nitrite (NO2−), nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O), before eventually converted to N2 [2,7,9–12]. Though relatively expensive compared with water replacement, biological denitrification attracts more attention recently because it offers high rate of nitrate removal and minimizes the discharge of wastewater and consumption of new water.
Novel tri-bore PVDF hollow fiber membranes for the control of dissolved oxygen in aquaculture water
2019, Journal of Water Process Engineering