doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.253
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AFM study of the SIMS beam induced roughness in monocrystalline silicon in presence of initial surface or bulk defects of nanometric size
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
B. Faresa,
,
, C. Duboisa, B. Gautiera, J.C. Dupuya, F. Cayrelb and G. Gaudinb
aLaboratoire de Physique de la Matière (UMR CNRS 5511), INSA de Lyon, 7 Avenue Capelle, F-69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
bUniversité de Tours, Laboratoire de Micro-Électronique de Puissance, 16 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, F-37071 Tours Cedex 2, France
Received 12 September 2005;
accepted 15 February 2006.
Available online 6 May 2006.
Abstract
In this paper, the SIMS beam induced roughness (BIR) in monocrystalline Si in presence of initial surface or bulk defects of nanometric size is studied. We follow the development of the BIR by monitoring the increase of Si2+ and SiO2+ signals during SIMS sputtering. The topography of the crater bottoms is measured at different steps of the evolution of the roughness using an atomic force microscope (AFM). We show that in presence of nanometric sized defects on the surface or in the bulk, the BIR develops far more rapidly than usual. It appears as soon as the crater reaches the defects and, as reported on Si free from any treatment, the same morphology evidencing waves perpendicular to the sputtering beam develops rapidly. This study of the behaviour of the BIR in presence of voluntarily introduced defects allows us to better understand the basic physical phenomena involved in its apparition.
Keywords: RMS roughness; Cavities; Silicon; SIMS; Topography; AFM
Fig. 1. SIMS matrix signals from the Samples C1, C2, P and Si(1 1 1) (no initial defects) analysed with a 8 keV O2+ beam in UHV. The signals are normalised with respect to the signal levels obtained for the defect-free Si. RMS roughness = 50 nm at 1.4 μm, 2.35 μm and 8.2 μm for P, C1 and Si(1 1 1) (no initial defects), respectively.
Fig. 2. (a–c) Section analysis and AFM image for C1, C2 and P. The z scales were set at a maximum value of 50 nm for the images in the left part of the figure and 300 nm for the images of the right part of the figure.
Fig. 3. Images AFM (2 μm × 2 μm) in the crater bottom as a function of the depth: sample C1. The incident beam is perpendicular to the waves. The z scales from left to right (from black to white): 2 nm, 50 nm, 50 nm, 50 nm and 300 nm.
Fig. 4. Images AFM (2 μm × 2 μm) in the crater bottom as a function of the depth: sample C2. The z scales from left to right (from black to white): 2 nm, 2 nm, 5 nm, 5 nm and 5 nm.
Fig. 5. Images AFM (5 μm × 5 μm) in the crater bottom as a function of the depth: sample P. The z scales from left to right (from black to white): 30 nm, 50 nm, 50 nm, 100 nm and 200 nm.
Fig. 6. Section analysis of the AFM images: (a) for C1 at 0.337 μm and (b) for C2 at 0.329 μm.

Corresponding author.