Production of a broad palette of positron emitting radioisotopes using a low-energy cyclotron: Towards a new success story in cancer imaging?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109860Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The criteria for selection of PET radioisotopes is discussed.

  • Positron emitting radioisotopes are categorized based on their stage of advancement.

  • Production methodologies and the radiochemical separation procedures are discussed.

Abstract

Over the last several years, positron emission tomography (PET) has matured as an indispensable component of cancer diagnostics. Owing to the large variability observed among the cancer patients and the need to personalize individual patient's diagnosis and treatment, the need for new positron emitting radioisotopes has continued to grow. This mini review opens with a brief introduction to the criteria for radioisotope selection for PET imaging. Subsequently, positron emitting radioisotopes are categorized as: established, emerging and futuristic, based on the stages of their advancement. The production methodologies and the radiochemical separation procedures for obtaining the important radioisotopes in a form suitable for preparation of radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging are briefly discussed.

Introduction

Cancer has become a global menace over the years and in today's world it is a major impediment to social and economic advances. Approximately 38 million people worldwide die of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) every year, out of which more than 9 million deaths are only due to cancer (Cancer Statistics, 2021; Lopez-Gomez et al., 2013; Global Cancer Observatory, 2020; Sung et al., 2021). According to the Global Cancer Observatory, it is estimated that there will be 15–17 million new cancer cases every year, of which 60% will be from the developing countries (Global Cancer Observatory, 2020; Sung et al., 2021). However, cancer related mortality can be significantly reduced provided it is detected at a very early stage. With current resources, one-third of newly diagnosed cancer patients could experience significantly increased survival, thanks to early-stage detection. In this endeavor, molecular imaging technology has emerged as one of the main pillars of comprehensive cancer care facilitating early diagnosis by non-invasive visualization and real time monitoring without tissue destruction (Bhanji et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2014; Jokar et al., 2021; Pysz et al., 2010; Wu and Shu, 2018).

Among the various molecular imaging modalities, positron emission tomography (PET) offers picomolar sensitivity and is a fully translational technique (Bhanji et al., 2021; Dagallier et al., 2021; Li and Conti, 2010; Slart et al., 2021; Zanoni et al., 2021). This approach requires specific molecular probes radiolabeled with positron-emitting radioisotopes having suitable radioactive decay parameters. The radioisotope incorporated in the molecular probe decays resulting in the emission of positrons which interact with nearby electrons after travelling a short distance (~ 1 mm) within the body. Each positron-electron annihilation process produces two γ-photons each of 511-keV in opposite directions, which are detected by the detectors surrounding the subject to precisely locate the source of the decay event (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, the ‘coincidence events’ data can be processed by computers to reconstruct the spatial distribution of the radiolabeled molecular probes and the PET images thus generated can reflect the concentration and in vivo distribution of the radiotracer administered (Fig. 1B). This technology provides highly sensitive and quantitative information and is playing an increasingly important role in earlier disease detection and improved therapeutic decision making.

Over the last three decades, PET has matured from a largely obscure and experimental technology to an indispensable constituent of routine nuclear medicine practices. Driving this transition, in part, have been mutually necessary advances in instrumentation and biomedical engineering, radiopharmaceutical chemistry and cancer biology. Somewhat unsung has been the seminal role of radioisotope production technology in fostering the availability of new PET radiotracers for improved cancer imaging and this review is an attempt to rectify this oversight. The positron emitting radioisotopes used for PET, being neutron deficient, are generally produced in cyclotron. Presently, more and more countries around the world are investing heavily on installation and commissioning of new cyclotron facilities, which are mostly low energy cyclotrons exclusively for production of medically important radioisotopes. In this review, we will first discuss the criteria for radioisotope selection for PET imaging. Then, we categorize the positron emitting radioisotopes produced in low energy cyclotrons as: established, emerging and futuristic. Thereafter, we discuss briefly regarding the production methodologies and the radiochemical separation procedures for obtaining the radioisotopes in a form suitable for preparation of radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging.

Section snippets

Radioisotope selection for PET

The choice of the radioisotope for PET imaging is guided by its nuclear decay properties, chemical characteristics, availability and time-scale of the studied biological process (Li and Conti, 2010). Precisely, the choice of radioisotope depends on its physical half-life, which should not only allow sufficient time for the radiolabeling reactions for formulation of radiopharmaceuticals but also match the pharmacokinetics of the corresponding biological tracers in order to obtain decent

Classification of radioisotopes

There are several categories of positron emitting radioisotopes. Few of them, such as 18F and 68Ga have been well established in clinical context and there are approved radiopharmaceuticals available in the commercial market (Coenen et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2013; Surasi et al., 2014). In case of certain radioisotopes such as 64Cu, 89Zr and 124I, there is emerging clinical interest and presently, clinical trials are going on in different parts of the world (Deri et al., 2013; Nagarajah et

Conclusions

In the preceding pages, it was our aim to shed light not only on the critical role that production methodologies of positron emitting radioisotopes has played towards synthesis and development of novel PET imaging agents but also showcase the power and promise of the new radioisotopes for translation to the clinic in future. This mini review clearly illustrates that the diversity in nuclear decay characteristics of the radioisotopes and their viable and cost-effective production routes (using

Authorship contribution statement

Rubel Chakravarty: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft.

Sudipta Chakraborty: Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. P. K. Pujari, Director, Radiochemistry and Isotope Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre for his valuable guidance and support to the Isotope Program.

References (111)

  • H.H. Coenen et al.

    Fluorine-18 radiopharmaceuticals beyond [18F]FDG for use in oncology and neurosciences

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2010)
  • A. Dash et al.

    99Mo/99mTc separation: an assessment of technology options

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2013)
  • L. De Nardo et al.

    Radiation effective dose assessment of [51Mn]- and [52Mn]-chloride

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2019)
  • M.A. Deri et al.

    PET imaging with 89Zr: from radiochemistry to the clinic

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2013)
  • R. El Sayed et al.

    Manganese-52 production cross-section measurements via irradiation of natural chromium targets up to 20 MeV

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2019)
  • J. Fonslet et al.

    Optimized procedures for manganese-52: production, separation and radiolabeling

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2017)
  • S.A. Graves et al.

    Novel preparation methods of 52Mn for ImmunoPET imaging

    Bioconjugate Chem.

    (2015)
  • S.A. Graves et al.

    Evaluation of a chloride-based 89Zr isolation strategy using a tributyl phosphate (TBP)-functionalized extraction resin

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2018)
  • C. Hoehr et al.

    Radiometals from liquid targets: 94mTc production using a standard water target on a 13 MeV cyclotron

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2012)
  • C. Hoehr et al.

    44gSc production using a water target on a 13 MeV cyclotron

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2014)
  • K. Ishiwata et al.

    Potential radiopharmaceuticals labeled with titanium-45

    Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instrum. A

    (1991)
  • D. Lamparter et al.

    Improved small scale production of iodine-124 for radiolabeling and clinical applications

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2018)
  • M. Le Fur et al.

    86Y PET imaging

    Methods Enzymol.

    (2021)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Radiopharmaceutical chemistry for positron emission tomography

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2010)
  • M. Lopez-Gomez et al.

    Cancer in developing countries: the next most preventable pandemic. The global problem of cancer

    Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.

    (2013)
  • D.W. McCarthy et al.

    Efficient production of high specific activity 64Cu using a biomedical cyclotron

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (1997)
  • J.C. Merrill et al.

    Cyclotron isotopes and radiopharmaceuticals—XXIV. Titanium-45

    Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1978)
  • C. Muller et al.

    Scandium and terbium radionuclides for radiotheranostics: current state of development towards clinical application

    Br. J. Radiol.

    (2018)
  • S. Noori et al.

    Excitation functions for the proton irradiation on 45 Sc target

    Int. J. Comput. Exp. Sci. Eng.

    (2019)
  • M.K. Pandey et al.

    Cyclotron production of 68Ga via the 68Zn(p,n)68Ga reaction in aqueous solution

    Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging

    (2014)
  • K.S. Pedersen et al.

    Liquid–liquid extraction in flow of the radioisotope titanium-45 for positron emission tomography applications

    React. Chem. Eng.

    (2018)
  • M.A. Pysz et al.

    Molecular imaging: current status and emerging strategies

    Clin. Radiol.

    (2010)
  • S.M. Qaim

    Production of high purity 94mTc for positron emission tomography studies

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2000)
  • S.M. Qaim

    Theranostic radionuclides: recent advances in production methodologies

    J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.

    (2019)
  • S. Ranjbar Bahadori et al.

    Radiolabeling strategies and pharmacokinetic studies for metal based nanotheranostics

    Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.

    (2021)
  • F. Rösch et al.

    Production of the positron emitting radioisotope 86Y for nuclear medical application

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1993)
  • P. Rowshanfarzad et al.

    An overview of copper radionuclides and production of 61Cu by proton irradiation of natZn at a medical cyclotron

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2006)
  • M. Sadeghi et al.

    Prediction of 94mTc production for positron emission tomography studies using the Monte Carlo code MCNPX-2.6

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2013)
  • J. Schmitz

    The production of [124I]iodine and [86Y]yttrium

    Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag.

    (2011)
  • A. Sun et al.

    Carbon-11 and fluorine-18 labeled amino acid tracers for positron emission tomography imaging of tumors

    Front. Chem.

    (2017)
  • Technical Report Series No 468. Cyclotron Produced Radionuclides: Physical Characteristics and Production Methods....
  • N.P. van der Meulen et al.

    Implementation of a new separation method to produce qualitatively improved 64Cu

    J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm.

    (2019)
  • F. Alves et al.

    Production of copper-64 and gallium-68 with a medical cyclotron using liquid targets

    Mod. Phys. Lett. A

    (2017)
  • Y. Bhanji et al.

    New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance

    World J. Urol.

    (2021)
  • Cancer Statistics, Available online at: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics. Accessed on June...
  • R. Chakravarty et al.

    Intrinsically germanium-69-labeled iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and in-vivo dual-modality PET/MR imaging

    Adv. Mater.

    (2014)
  • R. Chakravarty et al.

    64Cu2+ ions as PET probe: an emerging paradigm in molecular imaging of cancer

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2016)
  • I.F. Chaple et al.

    Production and use of the first-row transition metal PET radionuclides 43,44Sc, 52Mn, and 45Ti

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2018)
  • Z.Y. Chen et al.

    Advance of molecular imaging technology and targeted imaging agent in imaging and therapy

    BioMed Res. Int.

    (2014)
  • M. Chomet et al.

    State of the art in radiolabeling of antibodies with common and uncommon radiometals for preclinical and clinical immuno-PET

    Bioconjugate Chem.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Intermetallic cobalt–gallium targets for production of germanium radioisotopes

      2022, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
      Citation Excerpt :

      So-called “perfect Auger emitters” emit the majority of their decay energy via <50 keV Auger electrons (Filosofov et al., 2021). Few descriptions of germanium radioisotopes' production (69/71Ge) are found in literature, and none that might enable in vitro or in vivo applications (Valdovinos, 2017; Chakravarty and Chakraborty, 2021; Mirzadeh and Lambrecht, 1996). Second, there is high demand for 68Ge (T1/2 = 270.95 d, 100% ε) as the parent radionuclide in 68Ge/68Ga generators.

    • Opportunities and challenges of high-pressure ion exchange chromatography for nuclide separation and enrichment

      2022, Chinese Chemical Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the continuous development of the nuclear industry, the demand for radionuclides is increasing [1–7].

    View full text