Elsevier

Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Volume 132, February 2018, Pages 67-71
Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Study on a new design of Tehran Research Reactor for radionuclide production based on fast neutrons using MCNPX code

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.11.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Medical isotope production using fast neutron flux is investigated.

  • Tehran Research Reactor is considered for radionuclide production.

  • New flux trap designs are proposed to enhance the fast neutron flux.

  • MCNPX code is employed to investigate the results.

  • The results all indicate a significant enhancement in production yield.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to increase the magnitude of the fast neutron flux inside the flux trap where radionuclides are produced. For this purpose, three new designs of the flux trap are proposed and the obtained fast and thermal neutron fluxes compared with each other.

The first and second proposed designs were a sealed cube contained air and D2O, respectively. The results of calculated production yield all indicated the superiority of the latter by a factor of 55% in comparison to the first proposed design.

The third proposed design was based on changing the surrounding of the sealed cube by locating two fuel plates near that. In this case, the production yield increased up to 70%.

Introduction

Most radionuclides are produced by exposing suitable target materials to the neutron flux in a nuclear reactor for an appropriate time. Thermal neutron capture nuclear reactions are currently used for major radionuclide production. Thermal neutrons are those which are in thermal equilibrium with molecules/atoms of the surrounding medium (Manual for reactor produced radioisotopes, 2003). One of the most important factors for radionuclide production is a neutron flux intensity which should be optimized by considering special places within the reactor core or its surrounding (Mele, 1990).

Tehran research reactor (TRR) is commonly used to produce radionuclides via thermal neutrons (Aboudzadeh et al., 2015, Khalafi and Gharib, 2005, Deilami-nezhad et al., 2016). But it is noteworthy to mention that, production of some radionuclides such as 64Cu and 67Cu requires as large fast neutron flux as possible owing to their energy thresholds (Johnsen et al., 2015). In the case of being thermal reactor, it is not easily accessible to produce medical radionuclide via fast neutrons by considering the traditional design of the flux trap which contains only water that normally increases thermal to fast neutron flux ratio. So, some considerations should be taken and some new design should be introduced to produce efficiently.

In this study, some new design was taken to improve fast neutron flux in the central flux trap to produce medical radionuclides as high as possible in the TRR. Accordingly, MCNPX code (MCNPX User'’s manual, 2002) was employed for both benchmarking and simulating the reactor core and then was used to design the proposed different flux trap for reaching to the best results. For this purpose, this paper is organized in 5 sections: In the second section, descriptions of TRR are presented briefly. In the third section, simulation of the reactor core and benchmarking of the obtained results against experimental measurements are carried out. The new proposed designing of the flux trap along with the calculated results, including thermal and fast neutron fluxes have been presented in the section four. Eventually, the fifth section gives the conclusion.

Section snippets

Description of Tehran Research Reactor

Tehran Research Reactor is the only facility for reactor-based production of radionuclides which is needed for the extensive usage in all hospitals and medical centers in the country. This reactor is a 5 MW pool-type light-water moderated, heterogeneous solid fuel reactor in which the water is also used for cooling and shielding (AEOI, 1989, AEOI, 2001). Its core configuration consists of MTR-type fuel elements which are inserted in the specific grid plate assemblies (Khalafi and Gharib, 2005,

Validation and benchmarking

In this section of the study, validation of simulation has been presented. On this basis, the first operating core of TRR was modelled and the results were compared with experimental measurements (Zaker, 2004). Table 1 reflects the comparison between the obtained results and the experimental measurements.

Regarding Table 1, the calculated Relative Percent Errors (RPE) which can be defined as Eq. (1), are below 9% and consequently the validation of the results can be confirmed (Lashkari et al.,

Procedure of new design

In order to design the flux trap and perform the corresponding calculations and simulations, first it is necessary to consider an operational core. On this basis, the core which is shown in Fig. 1 has been considered (Khalafi and Gharib, 1999).

As shown in the Fig. 1, the core configuration includes 22 SFEs and 4 CFEs and one Regulating Rod (RR). The core simulation was also carried out using MCNPX code regarding Table 2 as the required input data.

Prior to applying the new design of the flux

Conclusion

This paper deals with the development and enhancement of the Tehran Research Reactor for production of radionuclides based on the fast neutron flux using MCNPX code. For this purpose, some new designs were proposed both in terms of reducing the fast neutron moderation and increasing the fast neutron production. The first and second designs were comprised of a sealed cube contained air and D2O instead of ordinary water (H2O) to reduce the moderation of fast neutrons. Consequently, the production

Acknowledgements

This project was performed based on the IAEA coordinated research project (contract 21021) and the authors would like to express their gratitude to Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute which sponsored the project under the scholarship program. The authors also would like to thank the IAEA for suggesting and supporting this research.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (4)

  • Opportunities and challenges of high-pressure ion exchange chromatography for nuclide separation and enrichment

    2022, Chinese Chemical Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    With the continuous development of the nuclear industry, the demand for radionuclides is increasing [1–7]. Major sources of nuclides include nuclear reactors [8–10], accelerators [11–13], and separation and extraction from nuclear fuel reprocessing waste [14–17]. The extraction of nuclides with practical value not only brings great economic benefits but also is conducive to the nuclear fuel closed cycle and the sustainable development of nuclear energy [18–20].

  • Study of the <sup>199</sup>Au nanoparticles production parameters via irradiation of platinum target by using thermal neutrons

    2022, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the present study, MCNPX-2.6 code has been used to simulate the geometry of TRR core and to estimate the activity at the end of neutron bombardment. The reactor core model is accomplished by an accurate simulation of all components with different geometries and materials, such as fuel rods, irradiation boxes, and control rods as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 (Zandi et al., 2018; Vagheian et al., 2016). The TALYS-1.9 (Koning et al., 2019) is an open-source software package for analyzing and predicting nuclear reactions.

  • Production assessment of non-carrier-added <sup>199</sup>Au by (n,γ) reaction

    2019, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
    Citation Excerpt :

    The MCNPX code has been developed based on the Monte-Carlo method and validated against a numerous of different complex problems (MCNPX User’s manual, 2002; Zandi et al., 2018). Accordingly, in this study, MCNPX code has been used to simulation of the TRR core and also estimation of the activity at the end of bombardment (Zandi et al., 2018). Modeling of the reactor core is accomplished by an accurate simulation of all components with different geometries and materials such as fuel rods, irradiation boxes and control rods (AEOI, 1989, 2001; Hosseini et al., 2016; Zandi et al., 2018).

View full text