Elsevier

Applied Geochemistry

Volume 46, July 2014, Pages 72-84
Applied Geochemistry

Contaminants from cretaceous black shale: II. Effect of geology, weathering, climate, and land use on salinity and selenium cycling, Mancos Shale landscapes, southwestern United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.12.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mancos Shale landscapes accumulate and store salt and Se.

  • Salt and Se reservoirs: dependent on geology, weathering, climate and land use.

  • Saturation paste-extract data accurately predict salt and Se fluxes from soil.

  • Irrigated soil is 16% of watershed area; produces 38% salt and 77% Se river loads.

  • Irrigation of Mancos Shale releases seven times more Se than all of pedogenesis.

Abstract

The Cretaceous Mancos Shale (MS) is a known nonpoint source for a significant portion of the salinity and selenium (Se) loads in the Colorado River in the southwestern United States and northwestern corner of Mexico. These two contaminants pose a serious threat to rivers in these arid regions where water supplies are especially critical. Tuttle et al. (companion paper) investigates the cycling of contaminants in a Colorado River tributary watershed (Uncompahgre River, southwestern Colorado) where the MS weathers under natural conditions. This paper builds on those results and uses regional soil data in the same watershed to investigate the impact of MS geology, weathering intensity, land use, and climate on salt and Se storage in and flux from soils on the natural landscape, irrigated agriculture fields, areas undergoing urban development, and wetlands. The size of salinity and Se reservoirs in the MS soils is quantified. Flux calculations show that during modern weathering, natural landscapes cycle salt and Se; however, little of it is released for transport to the Uncompahgre River (10% of the annual salinity and 6% of the annual Se river loads). When irrigated, salinity and Se loads from the MS soil increase (26% and 57% of the river load, respectively), causing the river to be out of compliance with Federal and State Se standards. During 100 years of irrigation, seven times more Se has been removed from agricultural soil than what was lost from natural landscapes during the entire period of pedogenesis. Under more arid conditions, even less salt and Se are expected to be transported from the natural landscape. However, if wetter climates prevail, transport could increase dramatically due to storage of soluble phases in the non-irrigated soil. These results are critical input for water-resource and land-use managers who must decide whether or not the salinity and Se in a watershed can be managed, what sustainable mitigation strategies are possible, and what landscapes should be targeted. The broader implications include providing a reliable approach for quantifying nonpoint-source contamination from MS and other rock units elsewhere that weather under similar conditions and, together with results from our companion paper, address the complex interplay of geology, weathering, climate, and land use on contaminant cycling in the arid Southwest.

Introduction

Nearly 36 million people and 4.5 million acres of farmland in the United States and Mexico depend on the Colorado River (U.S. Department of Interior, 2005). Serageldin (2000) considers this river one of the most stressed in the world because of increasing salinization, with damages estimated at $380 million per year in the United States alone (U.S. Department of Interior, 2005). In addition to salinization, selenium (Se) loading is of concern because Se concentrations exceed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s freshwater aquatic life chronic criteria (5 μg L−1) in some reaches of the river inhabited by threatened and endangered species of fish (Hamilton, 1998), and Se impacts the habitat of other wildlife in the area such as waterfowl (Presser et al., 1994, Butler et al., 1996). Much of the salinity and most of the Se loads in the Colorado River are sourced from rocks in the upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB). Tuttle and Grauch (2009) estimated that a third of the 2005 solute load in the river at Cisco, Utah (equivalent to dissolution of 1,400,000 t a−1 gypsum), and nearly all the Se (22 t a−1) were derived from the Mancos Shale (MS) in western Colorado.

In 1974, the U.S. Congress passed the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act. The purpose of the act is to control the salinity of water delivered to users in the United States and Mexico by constructing, operating, and maintaining projects in the Colorado River Basin. As of 2011, these efforts have reduced salinity loading in the river by 1,200,000 tons per year; however, it is estimated that an additional 660,000 tons per year of salinity are needed to meet the 2030 goal of 1,900,000 tons per year (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 2011). To target this additional salinity reduction, a more in-depth understanding of salinity sources and transport in the basin is required. This includes determining the role of natural weathering, climate, and land use on salinity. Because salinity and Se weathering cycles overlap (Tuttle et al., companion paper), reducing salinity will help reduce Se.

A number of studies have described salinity and Se derived from the MS in the UCRB and its tributary watersheds (e.g., Butler et al., 1991, Butler et al., 1996, Clark, 1995, Engberg, 1999, Brummer et al., 2002, Butler and Leib, 2002, Fisher, 2005, Kenney et al., 2009). None of these studies have quantified the geochemical cycles on different MS landscapes that control the distribution of salinity and Se between soil and mobile aqueous phases in the watershed, the goal of this study. This paper builds on results from Tuttle et al. (companion paper), which describe the geochemical processes that control salinity and Se during pedogenesis and erosion of the MS weathering naturally in the Uncompahgre River watershed (Fig. 1). Geochemical surveys provide regional data for salinity and Se on two MS landscapes in the watershed. The first landscape is located upland from the floodplain on the Gunnison Gorge National Conservation Area (GGNCA) and has not been disturbed by development or irrigation (Fig. 1, Fig. 2; referred to as natural landscape). The effects of geology and weathering intensity on reservoirs and fluxes for this landscape are quantified. Comparison with results from the regional survey on the second landscape (floodplain) shows the effect of climate and land use on reservoir size and contaminant fluxes. Salinity and Se cycling on the Uncompahgre River floodplain are further constrained with data from detailed studies of soil irrigated for variable lengths of time and laboratory leaching experiments. These results provide understanding of processes that control water quality in the watershed now and in the future. Together with the companion paper, this study provides resource managers with a quantitative approach for managing landscapes in semiarid to arid climates elsewhere where black shale weathers under similar conditions.

Section snippets

Study area

The Uncompahgre River in southwestern Colorado is a tributary to the Gunnison River that flows into the Upper Colorado River (Fig. 1). The climate in our study area is semiarid with less than 25 cm of precipitation per year. Beginning in 1908, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation created the Uncompahgre (irrigation) Project (UP), which provides an average of 412 km3 a−1 (334,400 acre-feet a−1; U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1982) of diverted Gunnison River water for irrigating 334 km2 of farmland in the lower

Sample collection

The samples collected for this study (Fig. 2) include soils across the GGNCA and UP; sediment from Sweitzer Lake; and water from drain tiles, shallow groundwater wells, Sweitzer Lake, and the Uncompahgre River. In 2005, a regional soil survey collected three depths of soil (0–5, 5–25, and 25–45 cm) from sites located on a 2.6-km2 (1-mi2) grid covering the GGNCA. Soil samples were collected with an auger, dried, and ground to less than 75 μm for bulk chemistry, and sieved to less than 2 mm for

Natural Mancos Shale landscapes

Tuttle et al. (companion paper) described the processes that occur during natural weathering and pedogenesis of the MS. Results showed that salt and Se reservoirs vary in size across the natural MS landscape and appear to be sensitive to a variety of factors. To capture the effect of two important variables (geology and extent of weathering), the regional GGNCA soil data (0–45 cm depth interval) are divided with respect to subsurface geology (Juana Lopez and Niobrara Members) and relative extent

Cycling of salinity and Se in the Uncompahgre River watershed

Cycling of salinity and Se for the lower portion of the Uncompahgre River watershed is reflected in three budgets calculated from: (1) data for surface water in the watershed (water budget); (2) the GGNCA regional data scaled to include all natural MS landscapes in the watershed outside of the UP (natural landscape budget); and (3) regional data for irrigated, non-irrigated, and wetland soil (UP landscape budget). Details on the construction of these budgets are in the online supplement.

Implication of results

Fig. 8 summarizes the contribution of each Mancos Shale (MS) landscape to the salinity and Se loads in the Uncompahgre River as calculated in the scaled GGNCA and UP budgets. The MS landscapes account for 25% of the area in the Uncompahgre River watershed and supplies 38% of the Uncompahgre River’s salinity load. Of the 38%, irrigated soil supplies 66% (26% in tailwater and 40% in tile drainage), 10% is from non-irrigated land in the UP, and 24% from the natural landscape. We assume that none

Acknowledgements

We thank Karen Tucker, Jim Ferguson, Amanda Clements, and Dennis Murphy of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management for managing logistics and providing access to the Gunnison Gorge National Conservation Area. We also thank Jean Morrison, Joshua Linard, and Janet Slate of the U.S. Geological Survey and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments that have greatly improved this paper. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by

References (29)

  • C.A. Rice et al.

    The analysis of forms of sulfur in ancient sediments and sedimentary rock: comments and cautions

    Chem. Geol.

    (1993)
  • M.L. Tuttle et al.

    An analytical scheme for determining forms of sulphur in oil shales and associated rocks

    Talanta

    (1986)
  • D.W. Anning et al.

    Dissolved Solids in Basin-fill Aquifers and Major River Systems in the Southwestern United States

    U.S. Geol. Surv. Sci. Invest. Rep. 2006-5313

    (2007)
  • Barnhart, R.A., 1957. Chemical Factors Affecting the Survival of Game Fish in a Western Colorado Reservoir. Master of...
  • Brummer, J., Fahy, J., Schaefer, S., 2002. Relationship of selenium in drainage water to the selenium content of...
  • Butler, D.L., Leib, K.J., 2002. Characterization of Selenium in the Lower Gunnison River Basin, Colorado, 1988–2000....
  • Butler, D.L., Krueger, R.P., Osmundson, B.C., Thompson, A.L., McCall, S.K., 1991. Reconnaissance Investigation of Water...
  • Butler, D.L., Wright, W.G., Steward, K.G., Campbell Osmundson, B., Krueger, R.P., Crabtree, D.W., 1996. Detailed Study...
  • Clark, S.L., 1995. The Distribution of Selenium in the Upper Colorado River. Dissertation, Arizona State University,...
  • Elliott, J.E., Herring, J.R., Ingersoll, G.P., Kosovick, J.J., Fahy, J., 2007. Rainfall–Runoff and Erosion Data from...
  • R.A. Engberg

    Selenium budgets for Lake Powell and the Upper Colorado River

    J. Am. Water Res. Assoc.

    (1999)
  • Fisher, F.S., 2005. Uncompahgre River Basin Selenium Phytoremediation: Final Report for EPA Grant #WQC 01-00057....
  • S.J. Hamilton

    Selenium effects on endangered fish in the Colorado River Basin

  • Hansen, W.R., 1971. Geologic Map of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison River and Vicinity, Western Colorado. U.S. Geol....
  • Cited by (35)

    • Parent material modulates land use effects on soil selenium bioavailability in a selenium-enriched region of southwest China

      2020, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      Land use has been well recognized to be a major factor causing far-reaching consequences for element biogeochemical cycles (Xiao et al., 2009). To date, however, most studies examining the influence of land use focus on macroelements such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus (Herpin et al., 2002; Potthast et al., 2012; Cherubin et al., 2016), not the trace elements (Anguelov and Anguelova, 2009; Tu et al., 2013; Islam et al., 2015), especially Se (Tuttle et al., 2014; Yanai et al., 2015; Plak and Bartminski, 2017). The direction and magnitude of land use effect on soil Se dynamics is not well known at present.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text