Elsevier

Applied Ergonomics

Volume 80, October 2019, Pages 209-213
Applied Ergonomics

Editorial
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Sport and Outdoor Recreation: From individuals and their equipment to complex sociotechnical systems and their frailties

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.027Get rights and content

Introduction

The benefits of sport and outdoor recreation are well known. These include positive impacts on our physical and psychological health and wellbeing as well as a range of broader community, societal and economic benefits. On the contrary, when sport and outdoor recreation systems fail, the consequences can be catastrophic and can include multiple fatalities, large-scale financial losses, and significant trauma to individuals and society. Such impacts can be seen in recent events such as the United States gymnastics sexual abuse scandal, the Mangatepopo Gorge Walking tragedy, the Jules Bianchi Formula One crash, and the FIFA corruption scandal.

As a discipline that is concerned with optimising system performance and human well-being, the important role that Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) can play in understanding and optimising sport and outdoor recreation has long been recognised (e.g. Reilly and Lees, 1984; Reilly and Ussher, 1988). As a result, a significant body of HFE work has been undertaken to date, and there are various researchers and practitioners currently working in the sport and outdoor recreation context (see Salmon and Macquet, 2017).

Broadly, the work of HFE practitioners in sport and outdoor recreation focusses on either optimising performance (athlete, worker, team, organisation, or system performance) or on preventing accidents and injuries. As the discipline of HFE has matured and advanced, the role that HFE plays in sport and outdoor recreation systems has grown. In the area of sport, for example, early applications focussed on individual athletes and sports equipment design (Reilly and Lees, 1984), however, theoretical and methodological advances have seen HFE applications expand to incorporate sports teams (Neville et al., 2017), sports organisations, and overall sports systems (Hulme et al., 2017). This has seen the focus of HFE work extend from physical HFE (e.g. anthropometrics, physiology, injury, disabilities) to cognitive HFE (e.g. situation awareness, decision making) and now to systems HFE (e.g. injury causation and prevention).

Alongside this, sport and outdoor recreation systems are becoming more complex, more technology centric, and in the case of sport, more competitive and more financially driven. As a result, the appetite for HFE research and practice is increasing. In addition, there is a growing recognition that the problems faced in sport and outdoor recreation settings are similar to those being tackled in more traditional HFE application areas such as transportation, defence, and process control (Salmon, 2017). Researchers and practitioners are recognising the benefits of applying HFE theory and methods, developed in other areas, in sport and outdoor recreation (e.g. Kermarrec and Bossard, 2014; Macquet and Stanton, 2014; Mclean et al., 2017). In turn, the potential to inform safety critical system design and the development of HFE theory and methods through sport and outdoor recreation applications is being realised (e.g. Goode et al., 2018; Neville et al., 2017).

This special issue on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Sport and Outdoor Recreation was proposed by the authors in response to this exciting new dawn for HFE in sport, as well as the recent emergence of HFE applications in the area of outdoor recreation (Dallat et al., 2018; Goode et al., 2016, 2018; Salmon et al., 2010, 2014; 2017a). The proposal was developed alongside the creation of a Human Factors and Ergonomics in Sport and Outdoor Recreation conference as part of the Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) conference in Las Vegas in 2015 (see Salmon and Macquet, 2017). The aim of both the special issue and the conference was to provide a platform for communicating contemporary sport and outdoor recreation HFE research, to showcase some of the key issues currently being tackled, and to inspire the HFE community to pursue further applications in sport and outdoor recreation. This special issue also provides an opportunity to reflect on our disciplines contribution as well as its potential role in future sports and outdoor recreation research and practice.

The seven articles included in the special issue each describe recent HFE applications within either sport or outdoor recreation systems. Following a brief overview of the history of HFE in sport and outdoor recreation, a summary of each contribution is provided. The main findings from each contribution are then brought together to articulate the key take home messages. In closing, we discuss the implications for future sport and outdoor recreation HFE research and practice.

Section snippets

Human Factors and Ergonomics in sport and outdoor recreation

As mentioned above, there is a significant body of HFE work covering a diverse set of issues in different sporting contexts. This body of work can broadly be decomposed into physical HFE, cognitive HFE, and systems HFE research (Salmon, 2017). Physical HFE research has examined issues ranging from sports equipment and clothing design (e.g., Lake, 2000; McGhee et al., 2013; Reilly and Lees, 1984) to sports injury (e.g., Theberge, 2011), and biomechanics (e.g., Lees et al., 2000). Cognitive HFE

Special issue contributions

Hulme et al. (Applying systems ergonomics methods in sport) open up the special issue with a focus on the burgeoning area of sports systems ergonomics. They present the findings from a systematic review of systems ergonomics applications in sport, the aim of which was to critically evaluate studies that have applied systems ergonomics methods in sports performance analysis and injury management. Hulme et al. reviewed five databases to identify sport studies that employed one of the following

Key take home messages

The contributions presented in this special issue provide evidence that HFE continues to be relevant in understanding and optimising sport and outdoor recreation systems (Salmon, 2017). The articles cover a diverse set of application areas, include the use of systems ergonomics methods in elite sport, volleyball player behaviour and situation assessment, running shirt, sports shoe design and trail running carrying and hydration system design, concussion management, and regulatory system design

References (49)

  • J. Rasmussen

    Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem

    Saf. Sci.

    (1997)
  • T. Reilly et al.

    Exercise and sports equipment: some ergonomics aspects

    Appl. Ergon.

    (1984)
  • P.M. Salmon et al.

    Injury causation in the great outdoors: a systems analysis of led outdoor activity injury incidents

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2014)
  • P.M. Salmon et al.

    Rasmussen's legacy in the great outdoors: a new incident reporting and learning system for led outdoor activities

    Appl. Ergon.

    (2017)
  • N.A. Stanton

    Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions

    Appl. Ergon.

    (2006)
  • X. Sun et al.

    The impact of user- and system-initiated personalization on the user experience at large sports events

    Appl. Ergon.

    (2016)
  • E.P. van der Putten et al.

    Shoe design for prevention of injuries in sport climbing

    Appl. Ergon.

    (2001)
  • Carden, T., Read, G., Goode, N., Salmon, P. M. (in this issue). Sociotechnical systems as a framework for regulatory...
  • A. Clacy et al.

    A knock to the system: a new sociotechnical systems approach to sport-related concussion

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2017)
  • Clacy, A., Goode, N. A., Sharman, R., Lovell, G., Salmon, P. M. (in this issue). A systems approach to understanding...
  • C. Dallat et al.

    Identifying risks and emergent risks across sociotechnical systems: the NETworked hazard analysis and risk management system (NET-HARMS)

    Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci.

    (2018)
  • N. Goode et al.

    Lost in translation: the validity of a systemic accident analysis method embedded in an incident reporting software tool

    Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci.

    (2016)
  • N. Goode et al.

    Bridging the gap between Accident Prevention Theory and Practice. Boca Raton

    (2018)
  • Herbaut, A. et al. (in this issue). Determination of optimal shoe fitting for children tennis players: effects of...
  • Cited by (4)

    • Systems thinking-based risk assessment methods applied to sports performance: A comparison of STPA, EAST-BL, and Net-HARMS in the context of elite women's road cycling

      2021, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      As all three methods align with contemporary accident causation models (Dallat et al., 2018), it is our view that they represent contemporary, state-of-the-art RA approaches. Alongside this evolution of RA methods, there is increasing interest in the application of HFE methods for the purposes of understanding and optimising both recreational and elite sports performance (Hulme et al., 2019b; Salmon and Macquet 2019; Salmon et al., 2020). In the area of systems HFE specifically, in-depth models of overall sports organisations and systems have been developed to identify factors that influence athlete and team performance (Hulme et al., 2019c; Mclean et al., 2019a).

    View full text