Review articleJob rotation: Effects on muscular activity variability
Introduction
Job rotation is a common administrative control (i.e., redesign of work/rest schedules or job/career changes) that is thought to be beneficial to workers’ musculoskeletal health. In general, job rotation consists of implementing planned changes in the tasks assigned to workers (Tharmmaphornphilas and Norman, 2007). Job rotation can appeal to industry because it is focused on work organization, which is an intervention that may be less costly to implement (Cunningham and Eberle, 1990). Specific strategies that may be considered in job rotation include alternating tasks, job enlargement, the use of active and passive pauses, changes in the work pace, shift scheduling, and changes in the overall organization of the development work (Luttmann et al., 2010, Rissen et al., 2002, Sundelin, 1993, Tharmmaphornphilas and Norman, 2007).
The main purpose of implementing job rotation is to reduce the exposure to risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders. Evidence of the benefits of this administrative control, however, appears to be still elusive (Luger et al., 2014). It has been reported that job rotation does not necessarily benefit all workers subjected to this type of control and that the use of job rotation does not necessarily result in an improvement of health outcomes or disability. Another reason to advocate for the implementation of job rotation is to introduce biomechanical exposure variability to a job, which is believed to have a beneficial effect for the worker (Madeleine and Farina, 2008, Madeleine et al., 2008).
Biomechanical exposure variability is thought to benefit workers by increasing their chances to recover from muscular demands (Mathiassen, 2006). Exposure variability is a general term that is associated with any estimator describing the dispersion of an exposure metric (e.g., Exposure Variation Analysis, standard deviation of the overall exposure distribution) (Loomis and Kromhout, 2004, Mathiassen, 2006). In the context of the present work, we are interested in changes in dispersion metrics along time or space of muscular activity that occur as a result of job rotation strategies. Changes in muscular activity variability are indicative of changes in muscular recruitment patterns (Srinivasan and Mathiassen, 2012), which have been hypothesized to occur when muscles go to rest or when muscular demands are changed (Hägg, 1991). However, there is little evidence indicating that job rotation indeed results in changes in muscular activity variability.
One previous review aimed to analyze the effects of task variation on physiological responses, including muscle activation, endurance time and subjective responses. The authors classified work variation as temporal variation (within task variation) and activity variation (between-task variation) and included studies focusing on non-computer repetitive tasks that involved the shoulder and lasted for more than 30 min. The authors concluded that there is some evidence for a positive effect of within task variation in some physiological metrics, such as blood pressure and endurance time, but not in metrics related to fatigue measured with electromyography (EMG). They also found that there are ‘ambiguous’ effects of between-task variation on muscle fatigue, as evidenced by the observed lower amplitude and higher frequency of EMG signals (Luger et al., 2014). This review, however, provided no evidence that work variation has a specific effect on muscular activity variability.
In the present study, we systematically analyze the literature to answer the following question: can job rotation strategies result in changes in muscular activity variability? We specifically aim to search for evidence of this impact on upper limb muscles such as trapezius, bicep and forearm muscles. An auxiliary question is whether a specific job rotation strategy is more likely to achieve changes in muscular activity variability. Finally, when the studies assessed more than one muscle group, we attempted to examine whether job rotation strategies differentially affect the assessed muscle groups. This is important because it could be argued that even if a job rotation increases muscular activation variability in one muscular group, it can perhaps reduce muscular activation variability in another muscular group, which would jeopardize the overall expected benefits of job rotation.
Section snippets
Methods
The literature search was designed to find articles published between 1975 and February 2016. We sought articles that included in the title, abstract or keywords 4 types of terms: terms that imply that there was job rotation; terms that imply occupational settings; terms that imply the assessment of an ergonomic demand; and terms that imply the use of muscle activity assessment (Table 1). The search was performed in 5 databases: OVID, EBSCOhost, PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Psychnet. All
Identified studies
The search strategy yielded a total of 13,801 articles identified, of which only 26 were considered to provide relevant information to the objective of the review (Fig. 1).
Quality assessment of studies
The quality assessment of the studies is presented in Table 2. Of the 26 studies identified in this review, 12 were found to be of high quality and 14 studies were considered of medium quality. The main aspects that affected the quality of the studies were short study duration or lack of follow-up research and the absence of
Discussion
This review aimed to find evidence about the effectiveness of job rotation as a strategy for increasing muscular activity variability, particularly the upper extremity. The fundamental assumption justifying our interest is that muscular activity variability is thought to provide opportunities for muscular rest, which would translate into a lower risk of occurrence of work-related MSDs (Mathiassen, 2006). Overall, the evidence suggests that job rotation can increase the variability of muscle
References (47)
- et al.
The importance of work organization on workload and musculoskeletal health - grocery store work as a model
Appl. Ergon.
(2016) - et al.
The influence of cycle time on shoulder fatigue responses for a fixed total overhead workload
J. Biomech.
(2015) - et al.
The effects of cycle time on the physical demands of a repetitive pick-and-place task
Appl. Ergon.
(2007) - et al.
Task rotation effects on upper extremity and back muscle activity
Appl. Ergon.
(2011) - et al.
Is rotating between static and dynamic work beneficial for our fatigue state?
J. Electromy. Kines.
(2016) - et al.
Working conditions, muscular activity and complaints of office workers
Intern. J. Ind. Ergon.
(2010) Diversity and variation in biomechanical exposure: what is it, and why would we like to know?
Appl. Ergon.
(2006)- et al.
Active pauses induce more variable electromyographic pattern of the trapezius muscle activity during computer work
J. Electromy. Kinesio.
(2009) - et al.
Effects of eccentric exercise on trapezius electromyography during computer work with active and passive pauses
Clin. Biomech.
(2009) - et al.
Measurement of trunk muscle fatigue during dynamic lifting and lowering as recovery time changes
Intern. J. Ind. Ergon.
(2007)