Elsevier

Applied Energy

Volume 227, 1 October 2018, Pages 49-63
Applied Energy

The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.114Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Comprehensive fluid-rock interaction models were built for CPG system study.

  • Back and down flow of water complicates fluid-rock interactions near injector.

  • Salt precipitation can affect geochemical reaction during geothermal development.

  • Geochemical reaction and salt precipitation reduce heat mining rate up to 2/5.

  • Low salinity water injection can effectively reduce salt precipitation in CPG.

Abstract

The ubiquitous natural sedimentary reservoirs and their high permeability have made the CO2 plume geothermal system increasingly attractive. However, the complicated fluid-rock interactions during the geothermal exploitation can cause severe reservoir damage, constraining the excellent heat mining performance of the CO2 and decreasing the possible applications of the CO2 plume geothermal system. In order to analyze and solve this energy issue affecting the geothermal exploitation, in this study, a comprehensive numerical simulation model was established, which can consider formation water evaporation, salt precipitation, CO2-water-rock geochemical reactions, and the changes in reservoir porosity and permeability in the CO2 plume geothermal (CPG) system. Using this model, the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation and their effects on the geothermal exploitation were analyzed, and some measures were proposed to reduce the influence of fluid-rock interactions on the heat mining rate. The simulation results show that the gravity and the negative gas-liquid capillary pressure gradient induced by evaporation can cause the formation water to flow toward the injector. The back flow of the formation water results in salt precipitation accumulation in the injection well region, which can cause severe reservoir damage and consequent reductions to the heat mining rate. The CO2-water-rock geochemical reactions could result in the dissolution of certain minerals and precipitation of others, but its minimal influence on the heat mining rate can be ignored. However, salt precipitation can affect the geochemical reactions by influencing the CO2 flow and distribution, which can reduce the heat mining rate up to 2/5 of the original. Sensitivity studies show that the reservoir condition can affect the salt precipitation and heat mining rate, so a sedimentary reservoir with high temperature, high porosity and permeability, and low salinity should be selected for CPG application, with an appropriately high injection-production pressure difference. The injection of low salinity water before CO2 injection and the combined injection of CO2 and water vapor can be applied to reduce the salt precipitation and increase the heat mining rate in the CPG system.

Introduction

Geothermal energy has several advantages, including large reserves, wide distribution, and low carbon emissions and was considered to be one of the promising supplements to fossil energy [1], [2]. The current surveys show that there are more than 14 × 1024 J and 25 × 1024 J of geothermal reserves, respectively, in the U.S. and China [3], [4]. However, the conventional geothermal reservoirs are usually located in the tectonically or volcanologically active regions and have small reservoir volumes, limiting wide developments and the utilization of the geothermal resources [5]. Therefore, some new methods will have to be developed to extract the abundant geothermal energy from the subsurface [6], [7], [8]. Meanwhile, the global warming induced by continuous emissions of greenhouse gases can result in the melting of mountain glaciers and the rise of the sea level [9], [10]. CO2 is the primary greenhouse gas, and some measures must be taken to control and decrease the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere [10], [11], [12].

In recent years, with the development of technology [13], [14], [15], [16], some fluids were proposed as the working fluid to exploit geothermal energy [17], [18] and CO2 was also proposed as a heat transmission fluid this can combine the geothermal exploitation and CO2 greenhouse gas emission reduction effectively [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Compared to water as a conventional heat transmission fluid, CO2 has many advantages for geothermal exploitation. At normal reservoir conditions, CO2 will be in its supercritical state of low viscosity, high density, and high heat capacity, which can increase the injectivity and heat mining rate [19], [22], [25]. Meanwhile, due to the large compressibility of CO2, the temperature difference between injection and production wells can result in a significant thermo-siphon effect, which can be fully utilized to decrease the parasitic power consumption [20], [21], [26].

The concept of using supercritical CO2 as a heat transmission fluid was first proposed in a geothermal exploitation from Hot Dry Rock by Brown (CO2-EGS) [19]. Subsequently, Pruess et al. studied the flow characteristics and heat mining rate in the CO2-EGS in detail [20], [21]. However, the ultra-deep well fracturing used in the CO2-EGS may cause seismicity, which makes the economic benefits and reservoir sealing uncertain. To solve these questions, Randolph et al. proposed a concept of using CO2 to exploit the geothermal from a natural high-permeability reservoir that is overlain by a low-permeability cap rock and this concept is called CO2-plume geothermal (CPG) system [22]. Natural high-temperature reservoirs are ubiquitous throughout the world and have larger pore volumes than the tight hot dry rocks [28], which means more CO2 can be sequestrated [29] and more geothermal can be exploited. Also, the CPG system can reduce or eliminate the need for complex and expensive hydraulic fracturing that is typically required in the EGS system [22], [23], [27]. These advantages make the CPG system attract more and more attention all over the world [30], [31].

However, there are still some issues with using CO2 to exploit geothermal energy. Compared with the CO2-EGS, more formation water is initially stored in the natural high-permeability reservoirs, which means there is a period for water production before CO2 production in the CPG system. Some literature has indicated that the production of formation water can decrease the heat mining rate because of the high viscosity of the water [23], [25]. Moreover, the formation water will react with the injected CO2 and then change the reservoir porosity and permeability [32], [33], which can affect the exploitation of geothermal energy. Usually, three distinct zones can form and develop with the continuous CO2 injection during geothermal exploitation [19], [32]: a single phase of dry CO2, two phases of CO2-water mixture, and a single phase of water with some dissolved CO2. The injected CO2 and the water will chemically react with the rock minerals in the zones of the two-phase CO2-water mixture and the single-phase water with dissolved CO2, which results in mineral changes. Whereas in the zone of the two-phase CO2-water mixture, the formation water, especially the irreducible water, will evaporate into the CO2 phase and then increase the dissolved Na+ and Cl concentration; this can result in salt precipitation and damage the reservoir [32], [34]. Meanwhile, the development of the three zones can affect the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation, which complicates the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation and may intensify their influence on the heat mining rate.

Studies on CO2 storage in conventional aquifers and sedimentary formations have demonstrated that the chemical equilibrium in the formation water can be broken after CO2 injection, which can result in different geochemical reactions involving mineral dissolution and precipitation [10], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Moreover, high reservoir temperature in the CPG system can accelerate the reaction rate and induce simultaneous changes to the reservoir porosity and permeability, which can significantly affect the heat mining rate [32], [39], [40]. Some researchers have performed the CO2-formation water-rock geochemical reactions. Ueda et al. conducted laboratory experiments in a CO2-water-rock system, which indicated that the presence of CO2 could promote the dissolution of plagioclase and anorthite minerals and the precipitation of carbonate substances [40]. Wan et al. proposed a two-dimension reactive transport simulation model to study the geochemical reactions in a CO2-water-rock system and assessed their impact on fluid flow [41]. Xu et al. studied the influence of CO2-water-rock interactions on the heat mining rate through a two-dimension reactive transport simulation model in a CPG system [32]. All of these studies showed that the CO2-water-rock geochemical reactions could change the reservoir porosity and a certain amount of CO2 can be trapped or stored in the products of mineral reactions.

For the salt precipitation, some experiments and simulation research has been conducted. The core flooding experiments indicated that the CO2 injection could result in salt precipitation, which can lead to low permeability and decrease the CO2 injectivity [42], [43], [44], [45]. Further, some CT scans revealed that a locally higher salt precipitation could occur in the area near the injection well [45], [46]. Regarding the simulation aspects, many multi-phase reactive flow simulations suggested that the evaporation of formation water can result in salt precipitation, which would damage the reservoir and reduce the heat mining rate [29], [31]. For example, the Spycher et al. [47] model of geothermal exploitation from Hot Dry Rock showed that significant salt precipitation clogging occurred in the production region for a low-salinity system, while clogging in the injection area occurred for a high-salinity system. Our previous research also indicated that local high salt precipitation could severely damage the reservoir due to a back flow of the formation water under some conditions [25]. All of these research indicated that salt precipitation could change the reservoir porosity and permeability and affect the fluid flow in the geothermal exploitation using CO2.

As the description above, although the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation are just physical and chemical reactions from a geophysical perspective, they will become directly relevant to the energy issues when these fluid-rock interactions occur in the geothermal exploitation in the CPG system. These fluid-rock interactions can damage the reservoir, decreasing the permeability and CO2 flow rate, and resulting in the heat mining rate decreasing eventually during geothermal exploitation. In some cases, these fluid-rock interactions even may totally clog local porosity and interrupt the continuity of geothermal exploitation, which will seriously restrict the development of geothermal energy. More importantly, the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation affect each other in the CPG system, and these reactions can affect the formation and development of seepage zones, which, in turn, can also affect these reactions. Moreover, some studies show that the formation water will flow back to the injection well under the actions of evaporation and capillary pressure, which may intensify the reservoir damage caused by the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation. However, there is a lack of systemic research work on the geochemical reaction and salt precipitation, particularly on their combined effects on the reservoir properties and heat mining rate in the CPG system. Therefore, it is essential and helpful to study their combined effect on the reservoir properties and geothermal energy exploitation in the actual application of the CPG system.

Therefore, the primary objectives of this work are to study the combined phenomenon of geochemical reactions and salt precipitation and their effects on the heat mining rate in the CPG system and thereby propose some measures to solve this energy issue affecting the geothermal exploitation. In this study, a comprehensive model for geothermal exploitation via CO2 recycling from a natural high-permeability reservoir was established that considers various processes, including the dissolution and diffusion of CO2 in formation water, the evaporation of formation water, geochemical reactions, salt precipitation, and the variations of porosity and permeability. The flow behavior of the CO2, geochemical reactions, salt precipitation, and their combined effects on the heat mining rate was analyzed, and the influences of reservoir pressure and temperature, the porosity, the permeability, the salinity of formation water, and the injection-production pressure difference were studied. In the end, techniques for preventing and mitigating the formation damage caused by these fluid-rock interactions are proposed and evaluated to enhance the heat mining rate during the real application of the CPG system.

Section snippets

Evaporation and dissolution of water

The formation water will continuously evaporate into the CO2 phase during CO2 injection, and a high temperature and continuous injection can significantly accelerate the evaporation. It is reasonable to assume the gaseous and aqueous phases are in thermodynamic equilibrium during CO2 injection and the following equation of the equality of fugacity was adopted for modeling the evaporation and dissolution of H2O in the simulation:fH2O,g=fH2O,wwhere fH2O,g is the fugacity of the H2O in the gas

One-dimension simulation results and analysis

During the geothermal exploitation in the CPG system, in order to clearly understand the fluid flow, geochemical reactions, and salt precipitation, it is useful to first analyze these processes with a one-dimension model. In the one-dimension model, the reservoir described in Table 1 is discretized by non-uniform meshes of 80 × 1 × 1 and small grids are used in the area near the injection well, starting with 0.1 m then increasing to 10 m. The injection well is located at the end of the reservoir

Two-dimension simulation results and analysis

Gravity also affects the fluid flow during geothermal exploitation in the CPG system [71]. Under the action of gravity, the injected CO2 will gradually rise because of the density difference between the CO2 and water, which can change the shape of the seepage zones. The changes in these seepage zones will affect the geochemical reactions and salt precipitation, which can have a great effect on the heat mining rate in the CPG system. Therefore, gravity must be considered for accurate modeling of

Sensitivity study on the heat mining rate

The reservoir changes and injection-production pressure difference can affect the fluid flow and induced geochemical reactions and salt precipitation, which can then affect the heat mining rate. In this section, based on Case 5 in the two-dimension, sensitivity studies were performed to analyze the influences of the initial reservoir temperature, pressure, porosity, permeability, salinity, and injection-production pressure difference, which can provide some guidance on screening reservoirs for

Methods for solving this energy issue

It can be seen from the above simulations that the existence of the formation water can seriously affect the heat mining rate in the early stage of geothermal exploitation, especially the salt precipitation caused by the back flow of the formation water can intensify this influence. Therefore, the production time of the water should be shortened through some measures, like improving the injection-production pressure difference in the early stage. For enhancing the heat utilization efficiency,

Conclusions

In geothermal exploitation from natural high-permeability reservoirs via CO2 recycling, the water evaporation, gas-liquid capillary, geochemical reactions, and salt precipitation can significantly affect the fluid flow and development of seepage zones, becoming an energy issue affecting the geothermal energy exploitation. In this paper, a comprehensive simulation model that considers formation water evaporation, CO2-formation water-rock geochemical reactions, salt precipitation, and the changes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51674282), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 17CX06006), the graduate innovation funding project from China University of Petroleum (East China) (YCX2017022) the National Oil and Gas Major Projects (No. 2016ZX05056004-003), and the Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research (IRT 1294 and 1086/14R58).

References (71)

  • H. Chen et al.

    Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2-and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion

    Appl Energy

    (2011)
  • A. Toffolo et al.

    A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in organic rankine cycle systems

    Appl Energy

    (2014)
  • K. Pruess

    Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) using CO2 as working fluid – a novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestration of Carbon

    Geothermics

    (2006)
  • K. Pruess

    On production behavior of enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as working fluid

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2008)
  • J.B. Randolph et al.

    Coupling carbon dioxide sequestration with geothermal energy capture in naturally permeable, porous geologic formations: implications for CO2 sequestration

    Energy Proc

    (2011)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China

    Appl Energy

    (2014)
  • G. Cui et al.

    Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects

    Appl Energy

    (2016)
  • H. Salimi et al.

    Integration of heat-energy recovery and carbon sequestration

    Int J Greenhouse Gas Control

    (2012)
  • J.K. Eccles et al.

    A “carbonshed” assessment of small-vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US

    Appl Energy

    (2014)
  • Q. Meng et al.

    Numerical analyses of the solubility trapping of CO2 storage in geological formations

    Appl Energy

    (2014)
  • F. Quattrocchi et al.

    Synergic and conflicting issues in planning underground use to produce energy in densely populated countries, as Italy: geological storage of CO2, natural gas, geothermics and nuclear waste disposal

    Appl Energy

    (2013)
  • B.M. Adams et al.

    A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions

    Appl Energy

    (2015)
  • T. Xu et al.

    On fluid–rock chemical interaction in CO2-based geothermal systems

    J Geochem Explor

    (2014)
  • A. Borgia et al.

    Numerical simulation of salt precipitation in the fractures of a CO2-enhanced geothermal system

    Geothermics

    (2012)
  • I. Gaus

    Role and impact of CO2–rock interactions during CO2 storage in sedimentary rocks

    Int J Greenhouse Gas Control

    (2010)
  • J.L. Palandri et al.

    Ferric iron-bearing sediments as a mineral trap for CO2 sequestration: iron reduction using sulfur-bearing waste gas

    Chem Geol

    (2005)
  • L. André et al.

    Numerical modeling of fluid–rock chemical interactions at the supercritical CO2–liquid interface during CO2 injection into a carbonate reservoir, the Dogger aquifer (Paris Basin, France)

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2007)
  • H. Ott et al.

    Injection of supercritical CO2 in brine saturated sandstone: pattern formation during salt precipitation

    Energy Proc

    (2011)
  • R.J. Bakker

    Package FLUIDS 1. Computer programs for analysis of fluid inclusion data and for modelling bulk fluid properties

    Chem Geol

    (2003)
  • A. Borgia et al.

    Simulation of CO2-EGS in a fractured reservoir with salt precipitation

    Energy Proc

    (2013)
  • M. Jin et al.

    Geochemical modelling of formation damage risk during CO2 injection in saline aquifers

    J Nat Gas Sci Eng

    (2016)
  • M. Alkattan et al.

    Experimental studies of halite dissolution kinetics, 1. The effect of saturation state and the presence of trace metals

    Chem Geol

    (1997)
  • Z. Rui et al.

    A quantitative oil and gas reservoir evaluation system for development

    J Nat Gas Sci Eng

    (2017)
  • Ali Sayigh. Renewable energy—the way forward. Appl Energy 1999;64(1):15–30....
  • H. Gupta et al.

    Geothermal energy: an alternative resource for the 21st century

    (2007)
  • Cited by (125)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The short version of the paper was presented at ICAE2016 on Oct 8-11, Beijing, China. This paper is a substantial extension of the short version of the conference paper (Original paper title: ‘‘Combined effects of geochemical reactions and salt precipitation on geothermal exploitation in the CPG system” and Paper No.:957).

    View full text