Scenario analysis of CO2 emissions from China’s civil aviation industry through 2030
Introduction
Airplane flights around the world contributed 2–3% of the total anthropogenic CO2 emissions in 2012, and this proportion will increase in the future [1]. In addition, aviation traffic is expected to double within 15 years of 2012, while fuel consumption and CO2 emissions should double in 25 years [2]. China’s civil aviation sector ranks second in the world in terms of total traffic turnover, including both passengers and cargo, behind only the United States [3]. The total turnover of China’s civil aviation reached 67.2 billion ton-kilometers in 2013 and has increased at an average rate of 9.5% per annum over the last 5 years. Unavoidably, the consumption of aviation fuel consumption has also increased rapidly, which has resulted in considerable CO2 emissions. The issue of reducing CO2 emissions in China’s aviation industry is increasingly gaining attention, particularly after the dispute over the inclusion of the air transport sector in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EUETS). Despite the heated debate in the industry, quantitative studies of CO2 emissions in China’s aviation sector are scarce. In particular, the issues of CO2 emissions with the future development of this industry and the impacts of crucial factors on the emissions have not been addressed.
According to our literature survey, many studies have investigated the issues of CO2 emissions from the aviation sector at a worldwide or countrywide level. Some have focused on medium-term or long-term scenario analyses [4], [5], [6], while others have discussed policy instruments and regulations, such as the impact of the inclusion of the aviation industry in the EUETS on air transport [7], [8]. Although China has become the second largest country in terms of the volume of aviation transport, studies of the CO2 emissions from China’s air transport sector are surprisingly rare. Loo and Li estimated CO2 emissions from passenger transport in China between 1949 and 2009 [9]. Their calculations focused on passenger transport and excluded freight transport. They employed both distance-based and fuel-based methods to estimate the general trends of CO2 emissions from four passenger transport modes and found that air transport has been the second largest contributor since 1998 after road transport. He estimated the CO2 emissions from aircraft in China’s civil aviation sector between 1960 and 2009 using a fuel-based top-down method that included both passengers and freight [10]. The results showed that the total CO2 emissions from aircraft in China increased from 0.12 Mt in 1960 to 41.44 Mt in 2009, while the emission intensity decreased from 2.9 kg per revenue ton-kilometer (RTK) to 0.96 kg per RTK over the same period. Fan et al. conducted an emissions inventory of several pollutants, including HC, CO, NOx, CO2 and SO2, during both the landing and take-off (LTO) and cruising stages within China’s aviation industry in 2010 [11]. Their method was also based on fuel consumption but disaggregated the data by airline and further by airplane type. In the 2010 inventory, the CO2 emissions from China’s domestic flights amounted to 38.21 Mt [11]. Cai et al. studied the carbon emissions of China’s transport sector in 2007 at both the national and provincial levels [12]. They also employed an estimation method that was based on fuel consumption and estimated the CO2 emissions of air transport in 2007 to be 22.4 Mt, which accounted for approximately 5% of China’s transport sector. All of these studies employed top-down methods that were based on fuel consumption due to the availability of data. However, their calculation boundaries and data sources were different, so their results varied somewhat.
In this context, this article constructs a series of scenarios to analyze the CO2 emissions from the aviation industry through 2030 while considering key influential factors, including the adoption of different jet fuel types with different emissions characteristics, the improvement of fuel intensity of aircraft due to technological advancements, and the increase of air traffic demand, to provide support for policy-makers within China’s aviation industry.
This article is organized as follows. Section 2 estimates the historical CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2013 to illustrate the increase since the implementation of the “reform and open-up” policy.1 Section 3 explains the details of the method and the data collection, including the consideration of changes in fuel types within the fuel consumption structure, technological improvements of fuel efficient aircraft and the growth in China’s air traffic. Section 4 introduces the scenario settings and analyzes the calculation results. Section 5 provides policy recommendations and concludes.
Section snippets
Calculation method and boundary
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommended three tiers of calculation methods for CO2 emissions from aircraft during the LTO and cruising stages [13]. Correspondingly, this study calculates the emissions from civil passenger and freight traffic from flight departure to arrival (including take-offs and landings for the relevant flight stages). The CO2 emissions that are related to the usual airport operations are not included. The most accurate method that is recommended by
Method and data
This study attempts to assess the CO2 emissions and the corresponding mitigation measures of China’s aviation industry in the medium-term future based on a scenario analysis:where is the total emissions of CO2 at year t in tons, is the emissions intensity at year t in ton/RTK, and is the total turnover of air traffic at year t in RTK. We use the fuel intensity to calculate the average emission intensity as shown in Eq. (3).where is the proportion
Scenario settings
Section 3 explains the key variables that were considered in the analysis: emissions factors, fuel intensity and air traffic volume. These variables also underlie the scenario development.
Table 4 shows the scenario settings for the jet fuel composition through 2030. Scenario A represents the situation in which low-carbon biomass-based HRJ makes up a large share (30%) of the total fuel consumption in 2030. This scenario assumes a stringent CO2 emissions reduction policy that requires the civil
Policy recommendations and conclusions
In 2009, China announced a CO2 mitigation target of a 40–45% reduction in CO2 intensity relative to the 2005 level. Correspondingly, the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) set a goal for China’s civil aviation industry of a 22% CO2 reduction per RTK in 2020 relative to the 2005 level [31]. In 2015, China proposed a new target to reduce the CO2 intensity by 60–65% and reach an emissions peak around 2030 [32]. The rapid expansion of China’s aviation industry has raised concerns about
Acknowledgement
The authors highly appreciate the detailed valuable comments from the three anonymous referees and the editors.
References (37)
- et al.
Aircraft cost index and the future of carbon emissions from air travel
Appl Energy
(2016) - et al.
Sustainable bio kerosene: process routes and industrial demonstration activities in aviation biofuels
Appl Energy
(2014) - et al.
Global carbon dioxide emissions scenarios for aviation derived from IPCC storylines: a meta-analysis
Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ
(2012) - et al.
International aviation emissions to 2025: can emissions be stabilised without restricting demand?
Energy Policy
(2009) - et al.
Incentive-based regulation of CO2 emissions from international aviation ☆
J Air Transp Manage
(2002) Including aviation in the European emissions trading scheme: Impacts on the industry, CO2 emissions and macroeconomic activity in the EU
J Air Transp Manage
(2010)- et al.
Carbon dioxide emissions from passenger transport in China since 1949: implications for developing sustainable transport
Energy Policy
(2012) - et al.
Emissions of HC, CO, NOx, CO2, and SO2 from civil aviation in China in 2010
Atmos Environ
(2012) - et al.
Using LMDI method to analyze transport sector CO2 emissions in China
Fuel Energy Abstracts
(2011) - et al.
Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2016)