Evidence of Fenton-like reaction with active chlorine during the electrocatalytic oxidation of Acid Yellow 36 azo dye with Ir-Sn-Sb oxide anode in the presence of iron ion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Synthesis of dimensionally stable Ir-Sn-Sb oxide anode: low [radical dotOH], high [HClO].

  • Quick decolorization in Cl/SO42− as electrolyte but accumulation of chloroderivatives.

  • Fenton-like reaction between electrogenerated HClO and added Fe2+: radical dotOH in the bulk.

  • Mineralization: PEF-like process > EF-like process > EO.

  • Acid Yellow 36 yields maleic and acetic acids along with SO42− and NO3 ions.

Abstract

The degradation of 2.5 L of Acid Yellow 36 solutions at pH 3.0 by electro-oxidation (EO) has been studied in a flow plant with a reactor containing an Ir-Sn-Sb oxide anode and a stainless steel cathode. The anode was prepared onto Ti by the Pechini method and characterized by SEM-EDX and XRD. It showed a certain ability to electrocatalyze both, the generation of adsorbed radical dotOH from water oxidation in sulfate medium and, more largely, the production of active chlorine in a mixed electrolyte containing Cl ion. The EO treatment of the dye solution in the latter medium led to a rapid decolorization because active chorine destroyed the colored by-products formed, but color removal was much slower in pure NaClO4 or Na2SO4 due to the limited formation of radical dotOH. In contrast, greater mineralization was obtained in both pure electrolytes since the by-products formed in the presence of Cl became largely persistent. The effect of liquid flow rate, current density and dye content on the EO performance in the mixed electrolyte was examined. The drop of absorbance and dye concentration obeyed a pseudo-first-order kinetics. Interestingly, the decolorization rate, dye concentration decay and TOC removal were enhanced upon catalysis with 1.0 mM Fe2+. Such better performance can be accounted for by the formation of radical dotOH in the bulk from the electro-Fenton-like process between electrogenerated HClO and added Fe2+. Even larger mineralization was achieved by the photoelectro-Fenton-like process upon irradiation of the solution with UVA light due to photolysis of some refractory intermediates. Maleic and acetic acids were detected as final short-chain linear carboxylic acids. The loss of Cl and the formation of ClO3, ClO4, SO42−, NO3 and NH4+ were evaluated as well.

Introduction

About 70% of the world dye production corresponds to azo compounds [1], which have a complex chemical structure containing one or various azo groups (single bondNdouble bondNsingle bond) as chromophore, linked to aromatic systems with lateral groups including single bondOH, single bondCH3 and −SO3, among others [2], [3], [4]. These dyes are extensively employed in textile industries, which are highly polluting in terms of the color, volume and complexity of their discharged effluents [5], [6]. Dye wastewater contains dye concentrations up to 250 mg L−1, along with other toxic components, thus causing aesthetic problems, scarce light penetration and health problems to aquatic organisms owing to their carcinogenic, toxic and mutagenic properties [7], [8]. The resistance to biodegradation and poor destruction of these pollutants by conventional treatments in wastewater treatment plants explain their large persistence in the aquatic environment [4], [9], [10]. Research is thus focusing on the development of more powerful treatments to remove azo dyes from wastewater in order to avoid their hazardous effects on living beings.

Several electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs), including electro-oxidation (EO, also called electrochemical oxidation or anodic oxidation) and processes based on Fenton’s reaction like electro-Fenton (EF), have been recently utilized to efficiently destroy azo dyes [4], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. EAOPs are easy to handle and very versatile, also presenting high energy efficiency, great effectiveness to oxidize organic pollutants and environmental compatibility. They show great ability for the in situ production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), like hydroxyl radical (radical dotOH) with such a high oxidation power (E° = 2.80 V/SHE) that it can non-selectively attack most organic pollutants until their mineralization [4], [21], [23], [30].

EO is the simplest EAOP applied to wastewater treatment. The most basic setup consists in an electrolytic cell containing the polluted wastewater in contact with a cathode and a large O2-overvoltage anode (M) that catalyzes the generation of adsorbed M(radical dotOH) radical from water oxidation at high applied current density (j) as follows [31], [32]:M + H2O  M(radical dotOH) + H+ + e

The production of M(radical dotOH) radical depends on the kind of anode. At so-called active anodes such as Pt, IrO2 and RuO2, M(radical dotOH) is transformed into a less powerful oxidant like chemisorbed “superoxide” MO [19], [33]. Such conversion can be minimized when using non-active anodes like PbO2, SnO2 and boron-doped diamond (BDD), which promote high contents of physisorbed M(radical dotOH) leading to the mediated electrochemical incineration of organic pollutants on the anode [11], [12], [18], [34], [35]. It has been found that several active mixed metal oxide (MMO) anodes yield larger degradation than pure metal oxides, as reported for phenol and Reactive Orange 4 using Ti/SnO2-Sb2O3 and Ti/SnO2-Sb-Pt, respectively [36].

This general description is valid when the EO treatment is performed in the presence of anions like ClO4, NO3 and SO42−, which remain stable during the electrolysis or become a source of weak oxidants, e.g., S2O82− at the BDD surface [31], [32]. In contrast, the EO process becomes much more complex in the presence of Cl because it can be oxidized to active chlorine (Cl2, HClO and/or ClO) via Reactions (2)–(4), which competes with M(radical dotOH) to attack the organic molecules [1], [4], [21], [22], [23], [26], [37], [38].2 Cl  Cl2(aq) + 2 eCl2(aq) + H2O  HClO + Cl  + H+HClO  ClO + H+

The predominant active chlorine species is Cl2(aq) (E° = 1.36 V/SHE) up to pH 3.0, HClO (E° = 1.49 V/SHE) within the pH range 3–8 and ClO (E° = 0.89 V vs. SHE) at pH > 8.0. The mediated electrochemical oxidation of organics with these species is then expected to be more successful in acidic medium. On the other hand, Kishimoto et al. [39] recently suggested the enhanced decontamination of acidic wastewater containing Cl through the generation of radical dotOH in the bulk using Fe2+ and HClO via Fenton-like Reaction (5) [40]. Note that, actually, this corresponds to an EF-like process in which Reaction (5) replaces the classical Fenton’s reaction between H2O2 and Fe2+ catalyst to form Fe3+ and radical dotOH [4], [23]. Reaction (5) can thus be sustained from Fe2+ regeneration upon cathodic reduction of Fe3+ via Reaction (6). Additionally, one could envisage the production of larger amounts of radical dotOH from the photolytic reduction of Fe(OH)2+, the pre-eminent Fe3+ species at pH 3.0, by Reaction (7) upon use of UVA radiation [30], [41]. The latter photoelectrocatalytic treatment, which is reported for the first time, can be so-called PEF-like process.HClO + Fe2+  Fe3+ + radical dotOH + ClFe3+ + e  Fe2+Fe(OH)2+ + hν  Fe2+ + radical dotOH

To give evidence of the upgrading of azo dye removal under EF-like and PEF-like conditions, we have undertaken a study on the degradation of Acid Yellow 36 in acidic chlorinated solutions using a purpose-made Ir-Sn-Sb oxide anode with ability to produce M(radical dotOH) radicals and active chlorine [38], [42]. Acid Yellow 36 (also known as Metanil Yellow, see physicochemical properties in Table 1) has been chosen as model azo dye because it is present in wastewater from textile, tannery, paper and cosmetic industries, among others. This refractory dye is a toxic and carcinogenic pollutant that causes mortality and adverse health effects in fishes [43]. Its consumption by humans causes toxic methaemoglobinaemia and cyanosis, whereas its contact with skin produces allergic dermatitis [44]. Effective decolorization and/or mineralization of synthetic Acid Yellow 36 solutions upon the action of radical dotOH has been described by several AOPs including photocatalysis with TiO2 [45], [46] and ZnO [47], Fenton [48] and photo-Fenton [49]. EAOPs such as EO [50], EF [14], [51] and PEF [15] with BDD anode, as well as PEF combined with TiO2 photocatalysis [46], have also been employed but only in sulfate medium.

This article presents the results obtained for the degradation of a 0.46 mM Acid Yellow 36 solution (100 mg L−1 of total organic carbon (TOC)) in a 35 mM NaCl + 25 mM Na2SO4 mixture at pH 3.0 by EO. The experiments were performed in a 2.5 L flow plant with a filter-press cell equipped with an Ir-Sn-Sb oxide anode and a stainless steel cathode. The anode was composed of an MMO film onto Ti plate prepared by the Pechini method [52]. It was characterized by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) and X-ray-diffraction (XRD), whereas its electrocatalytic ability to generate radical dotOH and active chlorine was analyzed by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and UV/vis spectroscopy, respectively. The effect of liquid flow rate, j and dye concentration on decolorization rate and mineralization degree was examined. Comparative trials using pure NaClO4 or Na2SO4 as electrolyte were made to better assess the role of active chlorine in the mixed electrolyte. The influence of Fe2+ addition to the latter medium, either in the dark or under UVA irradiation, was studied to give strong evidence of the occurrence of a Fenton-like reaction. Intermediates and inorganic ions lost or released during the dye degradation were identified.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Commercial Acid Yellow 36 (70% of dye content, the rest corresponding to inorganic products) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. The products for the MMO synthesis were H2IrCl6·xH2O, SnCl4 and SbCl3 of analytical grade supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. The electrolytic solutions were prepared with deionized water and contained FeSO4·7H2O, Na2SO4, NaOH, NaCl and/or HClO4 of analytical grade purchased from Fluka, Merck and Panreac. Analytical grade 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide

Characterization of the Ir-Sn-Sb oxide electrode

Fig. S1a of Supplementary material depicts representative SEM images at magnifications of 1000× and 20,000× for the Ir-Sn-Sb oxide coating onto the Ti substrate, as obtained by the Pechini method. A good coverage and high adherence was revealed to the naked eye. A compact and uniformly distributed oxide layer can be observed at 1000×, evidencing a certain roughness at 20,000×. The surface morphology presented some small cracks, as expected from thermal treatments that cause a rapid evolution of

Conclusions

The Ir-Sn-Sb oxide anode prepared by the Pechini method showed a low production of adsorbed M(radical dotOH), but a large ability to generate active chlorine (as HClO) in a Cl-containing electrolyte. A quick decolorization of Acid Yellow 36 solutions was found in this medium by EO due to action of HClO over the colored by-products, although the accumulation of chloroderivatives impeded the complete mineralization. In contrast, the color was poorly removed in NaClO4 or Na2SO4 media because of the small

Acknowledgements

Financial support from project CTQ2016-78616-R (MINECO, Feder, EU) is acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank financial support under project 240522 (CONACYT, Mexico) and project 869/2016 (University of Guanajuato, Mexico). Z. Aguilar is grateful to CONACYT for the PhD scholarship No. 421053 granted.

References (56)

  • D. Rajkumar et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater. B

    (2006)
  • T. Robinson et al.

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2001)
  • E. Forgacs et al.

    Environ. Int.

    (2004)
  • E. Brillas et al.

    Appl. Catal B: Environ.

    (2015)
  • A.B. dos Santos et al.

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2007)
  • S.M.A.G. Ulson de Souza et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2007)
  • K.P. Sharma et al.

    Chemosphere

    (2007)
  • V.J.P. Vilar et al.

    Sol. Energy

    (2011)
  • V. Khandegar et al.

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2013)
  • M. Villanueva-Rodríguez et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • A. Özcan et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • K. Cruz-González et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • E.J. Ruiz et al.

    Chemosphere

    (2011)
  • S. Garcia-Segura et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2011)
  • A.J. Méndez-Martínez et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2012)
  • A. El-Ghenymy et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2014)
  • A. Thiam et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2015)
  • A. Thiam et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2015)
  • T.X.H. Le et al.

    Carbon

    (2015)
  • A. Thiam et al.

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2015)
  • A. Bedolla-Guzman et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2016)
  • V.M. Vasconcelos et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2016)
  • F.C. Moreira et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2017)
  • G. Coria et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • E. Butrón et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2007)
  • J.L. Nava et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2007)
  • W. Wu et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2014)
  • D.Z. Mijin et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (109)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text