Influence of iron leaching and oxidizing agent employed on solar photodegradation of phenol over nanostructured iron-doped titania catalysts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Structure/activity relationships over nanostructured iron-doped titania photocatalysts for solar degradation of phenol.

  • Iron leaching shown to be most relevant for the photoactivity.

  • Results compared in terms of the oxidizing agent, either H2O2 or oxygen from air.

Abstract

Iron-doped TiO2 catalysts with two different iron contents (0.7 and 3.5 wt.%) as well as the corresponding undoped system, prepared by a combined sol–gel/microemulsion method and calcined at 600 °C, have been examined with respect to their behaviour for photocatalytic degradation of aqueous phenol with H2O2 under solar light. The activity results are complemented with structural/morphological and electronic characterization analysis achieved by XRD, TEM, Raman, SBET, UV–vis DRS and XPS techniques. A detrimental effect of the presence of iron on the photoactivity is detected for the sample with 0.7 wt.% iron. In contrast, some activity enhancement is produced for the sample with highest iron loading. Such irregular catalytic behaviour with respect to iron loading is analyzed on the basis of the presence of additional catalytic contributions from new photoactive species. These are created as a consequence of surface modifications produced under reaction conditions related to the existence of phenomena of iron leaching from the catalysts. Differences in the specific nanostructure present in each case can also play a role on explaining the differences observed in the photoactivity. Finally, an analysis of the photoactivity as a function of the oxidizing agent employed, either H2O2 or oxygen from air, is also performed.

Introduction

Polycrystalline titanium dioxide presents unique properties as heterogeneous photocatalyst considering its good stability in aqueous environment under ambient pressure and temperature condition [1], [2]. However, its photocatalytic efficiency can be limited by stabilization of the charge photocarriers in the bulk of the material, by fast electron–hole recombination either at the bulk or at the surface of the oxide or by its relatively large band gap which limits light absorption in the visible region [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Among strategies aimed to enhance such properties, in particular extending light absorption to the visible region, it is common to employ methods based on doping the titania catalyst with transition metal cations [7], [8], [9], [10]. Fe3+ is considered among most interesting dopants in this sense since it originates a localized narrow band above the valence band of titania which makes the catalyst sensitive to visible absorption [11], [12]. However, the catalytic role of the Fe3+ dopant during photooxidation processes remains controversial [8], [9], [10], [13], [14], [15]. Thus, discrepancies appear with respect to its role in enhancing electron/hole recombination properties since the presence of iron in the catalyst formulation has been reported to be detrimental to the photoactivity in a great number of cases [10], [13]. In turn, the photoactivity of iron-doped titania under visible light can be limited because the oxidizing power and mobility of holes in the Fe3+-derived localized narrow band can be lower than that of holes in the valence band of TiO2 [11].

In any case, optimum photocatalytic properties have been apparently achieved in an important number of cases upon homogeneous doping at a relatively low level around 0.5–1 at.%, at which the distance between dopant cations in the titania lattice could optimize dynamical characteristics of the recombination process [1], [3], [10]. However, doping above such optimum level typically results detrimental to the photoactivity [10], [15], [16], [17]. In turn, the specific reaction conditions (solution pH or type of oxidant employed) can strongly affect the photocatalytic properties of titania-based materials [10], [18], [19]. In this sense, it is generally concluded that the use of H2O2 as oxidizing agent can significantly enhance, as compared with dissolved oxygen, the UV- or visible-photoassisted contaminants oxidation rate [18], [20], [21], [22], in spite of its possible hydroxyl radical scavenger role [18], [23], [24]. Other interrelated aspects that could affect the photoactivity concern modifications of the surface properties induced by doping as well as the possibility that species originated from iron lixiviates can participate in the reaction mechanism [11], [12], [17], [25], [26], [27], [28].

With respect to this latter, we have proposed in a recent work the involvement of iron species leached under reaction conditions from iron-doped titania in the mechanism of solar contaminants photodegradation employing oxygen as oxidant under semi-pilot plant conditions [27]. A similar study has been performed when H2O2 is employed as oxidant over nanostructured anatase TiO2 (crystal size between about 10 and 12 nm, as obtained when using calcination at 450 °C as final preparation step) systems of this kind, also indicating an important role of such leached iron species [17]. The present work aims to extend the latter analysis, employing H2O2 as oxidant, to more crystalline catalysts (obtained by calcination at 600 °C) in order to explore whether the mechanism involving iron leached species could still prevail in the presence of more crystallized and likely more stable iron oxide and titania entities, and considering also the effects of crystallinity on phenol photooxidation activity [22], [27], [28], [29], [30]. In this respect, it must be noted that our previous results comparing samples calcined at 450 °C (anatase) and 600 °C (mixed anatase–rutile) when using O2 (from air) as oxidant showed a generally higher photoactivity for the latter despite their appreciably lower specific surface area [27]. Within this context, pure titania and iron-doped titania catalysts prepared by sol–gel/microemulsion method and (as final preparation step) calcined at 600 °C have been tested for phenol photodegradation with H2O2 under solar light irradiation in a pilot plant system. Information achieved by employing different structural and electronic characterization techniques (XRD, TEM, Raman, SBET, as well as UV–vis and XPS spectroscopies) has been employed to complement the discussion of the catalytic activity results.

Section snippets

Experimental

Iron-doped photocatalysts were prepared using a combined sol–gel/microemulsion preparation method. Titanium-tetraisopropoxide was added to a reverse microemulsion in which the aqueous phase contains a solution of iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate; this was dispersed in n-heptane, using Triton X-100 (Aldrich) as surfactant and 1-hexanol as cosurfactant [3], [15], [27]. The resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h, centrifuged and decanted, and the obtained solid was rinsed with methanol and dried at

Catalysts characterization

Characterization results for some of the catalysts here examined were in part reported in previous contributions [3], [27]. Nevertheless, for the sake of self-consistency and completeness, full characterization results are compiled here. X-ray diffractograms and Raman spectra of the catalysts are displayed in Fig. 1. Table 1 summarizes main structural parameters derived from analysis of such results. In brief, the catalysts are basically constituted by the anatase form of titania (XRD peaks

Conclusions

Titania and iron-doped titania photocatalysts prepared by sol–gel/microemulsion and calcined at 600 °C have been tested with respect to their activity for phenol photodegradation employing hydrogen peroxide as oxidizing agent under solar irradiation at pilot plant scale. Opposite to results generally obtained in the literature, in which optimum photocatalytic properties are achieved upon doping at a relatively weak level (around 1 at.%), it is observed that the catalyst with a relatively high

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the MEC (projects CTQ2004-03409/BQU, CTQ2006-15600/BQU and CTM2010-14883) and CSIC (project PIF 200420F0280) and Programa de Acceso de Grandes Instalaciones Científicas Españolas GIC-05-17, for financial support. Support from EU COST Action CM1104 is also acknowledged. We would also like to thank ICP-CSIC Unidad de Apoyo staff for performing a part of the textural analysis and spectroscopic results, as well as Dr. Laura Pascual for performing the TEM experiments and Prof.

References (48)

  • M.A. Henderson

    Surface Science Reports

    (2011)
  • C. Adán et al.

    Catalysis Today

    (2007)
  • M. Pelaez et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2012)
  • M. Litter et al.

    Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A

    (1996)
  • E. Piera et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2003)
  • J. Navío et al.

    Applied Catalysis A

    (1999)
  • C. Adán et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2007)
  • K.T. Ranjit et al.

    Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A

    (1997)
  • C. Adán et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2011)
  • C. Adán et al.

    Catalysis Today

    (2009)
  • T. Velegraki et al.

    Chemical Engineering

    (2008)
  • C.G. Silva et al.

    Journal of Molecular Catalysis A

    (2009)
  • B. Tryba et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2006)
  • J. Carbajo et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2011)
  • J. Araña et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2003)
  • W.Y. Teoh et al.

    Catalysis Today

    (2007)
  • C. Adán et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2009)
  • M. Kositzi et al.

    Solar Energy

    (2004)
  • J. Zhu et al.

    Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A

    (2006)
  • A. Rey et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2009)
  • A. Santos et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2006)
  • J. Bandara et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2001)
  • H. Kim et al.

    Applied Catalysis B

    (2012)
  • M. Hincapie et al.

    Catalysis Today

    (2005)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Assessment of pilot-plant scale solar photocatalytic hydrogen generation with multiple approaches: Valorization, water decontamination and disinfection

      2022, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      As mentioned above, Cu reduction can occur even in the absence of light [43], although the dark deposition mechanism is not well understood. A similar effect was demonstrated in an Fe–TiO2 system in which iron lixiviation/re-adsorption during the photocatalytic reaction was reported [47]. Consequently, high CuO content seems to be detrimental to photocatalytic activity, because both the original black CuO, and the intense brown Cu that later forms on the reactor walls, would hinder photon absorption by TiO2.

    • Role of Fe(III) in aqueous solution or deposited on ZnO surface in the photoassisted degradation of rhodamine B and caffeine

      2020, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our opinion, a great interest has been put in the search of improving the photocatalytic properties of ZnO based materials by doping with iron in order to extending the visible absorption and the photocatalytic activity under visible illumination (Paola et al., 2012) (Ong et al., 2018) (Ani et al., 2018) (Lee et al., 2016). However, although there are several publications related to the role of iron incorporated in TiO2 (Litter and Navío, 1994) (Litter and Navío, 1996) (Navío et al., 1999) (Araña et al., 2002) (Franch et al., 2005) (Adán et al., 2014) little attention has been paid in understanding the role of Fe3+ incorporated in ZnO. Several locations are possible for the Fe3+ incorporation that indeed depend upon the procedure employed: i) the Zn2+-cationic vacancies at the surface level or ii) within the lattice and the interstitial sites of the ZnO in crystal lattice.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text