Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 505, 25 September 2015, Pages 77-85
Applied Catalysis A: General

Promotion effect of rare-earth elements on the catalytic decomposition of ammonia over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.07.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The Ni/Al2O3 catalysts modified by rare-earth elements were investigated.

  • The addition of rare-earth elements promoted ammonia decomposition reaction.

  • La-modified Ni/Al2O3 was most active in this study.

  • The hydrogen inhibition phenomenon was alleviated by the modification.

Abstract

Ammonia decomposition has attracted much attention as an efficient method for the on-site generation of hydrogen. In this study, alumina-supported nickel catalysts (Ni/Al2O3) modified by rare-earth elements were prepared by the impregnation method and their catalytic activity for the ammonia decomposition was investigated. The addition of rare-earth elements promoted the decomposition reaction over catalysts and the La-modified catalyst achieved the highest ammonia conversion in this work. For the modified catalysts, the adsorbed hydrogen, which is known to be an inhibitive species for the ammonia decomposition, desorbed at lower temperature compared to the unmodified one. Therefore, the effective alleviation of hydrogen inhibition would be responsible for the activity enhancement for the modified catalysts. The reaction kinetics study also supported this proposed mechanism. For the La-modified catalyst, the optimal pretreatment condition was investigated to enhance the catalytic activity. The catalyst calcined at 400 °C followed by reduction at 600 °C exhibited the highest ammonia conversion of 94% at 550 °C.

Introduction

In recent years, fuel cells have attracted much attention as promising power generation devices because of high energy conversion efficiency and low emission. Hydrogen is a primary fuel source for fuel cells especially operated at low temperatures. However, the storage and transportation of hydrogen are major obstacles for the spread of fuel cell systems due to its low volumetric density and boiling point. For this reason, on-site generation of hydrogen has been accomplished by the reforming of hydrocarbons. However, CO is produced as a by-product upon the reforming process and degrades the performance of Pt electrode in polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs). Thus, the CO concentration in the fuel gas is reduced less than 10 ppm via water gas shift reaction and preferential oxidation reaction in the residential PEFC cogeneration system [1], [2]. This makes the system complicated.

Ammonia is regarded as a prospective hydrogen carrier because of its favorable properties for on-site hydrogen generation. Ammonia can be liquefied under mild conditions (–33.4 °C at atmospheric pressure or 8.46 atm at 20 °C) and possesses high hydrogen storage capacity (17.6 wt.%) compared to other hydrogen carriers. In addition, the hydrogen production via the ammonia decomposition does not emit CO. This decomposition process corresponds to a reverse reaction of ammonia synthesis. Ammonia decomposes endothermically into nitrogen and hydrogen as follows;2NH3  N2 + 3H2 ΔH° = +46 kJ mol−1

Many studies have been reported for the development of ammonia decomposition catalysts such as metals, alloys, carbides, and nitrides, and it was revealed that Ru, Ir, Ni, Rh, Pt, Pd, and Fe metals, MoNx, and VCx catalysts promoted this reaction [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Since Ru catalysts are the most active among them, much effort has been devoted for the catalyst development [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. In previous reports, Ru catalysts supported on carbon nanotube (CNT) showed very high activity for ammonia decomposition because the high surface area of CNT enabled high dispersion of Ru species [2], [8], [9]. Moreover, the addition of basic components such as alkali metals to the catalysts promoted the decomposition reaction. These species could facilitate the combinative desorption of nitrogen atoms, which is generally accepted as the rate-determining step in the ammonia decomposition, via the electron transfer from the additives to active species. Especially, the prominent effect of basic additives was confirmed for the CNT-supported catalysts due to high electron conductivity of CNT as compared with other metal oxide supports [8]. Recently, it was reported that the Ru catalyst supported on inorganic electride, [Ca24Al28O64]4+(e)4, showed higher activity than K-modified Ru/graphite carbon and Cs-modified Ru/MgO catalysts. The electron injection from the electride to the antibonding orbital of Ru–N bond reduced the activation energy of decomposition reaction [14]. However, the limited availability of noble metals makes it necessary to develop catalysts with low cost. Thus, Ni catalysts have attracted much interest as alternative materials for ammonia decomposition because they attained the highest activity among non-noble metal catalysts [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. In previous works, La and Ce species were known as effective promoters for Ni catalysts [20], [21], [22]. However, the promotion effect of other rare-earth elements has not been investigated sufficiently for Ni catalysts. In this study, therefore, we investigated the activity of Ni/Al2O3 catalysts modified by various rare-earth elements for ammonia decomposition. To clarify the additive effects on the reaction behavior of reactant and products during ammonia decomposition, their desorption processes were also examined. Besides, the kinetics analysis was carried out to elucidate the influence of hydrogen, which is known to be an inhibitive species for the ammonia decomposition [2], [14], [26], [27], on the catalytic performance. Furthermore, the optimization of heat treatment condition for the synthesis of La-modified catalyst was conducted because the La element significantly enhanced the catalytic activity of Ni/Al2O3.

Section snippets

Sample preparation

Ni/Al2O3 catalysts modified by rare-earth elements were prepared by the impregnation method. Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) and Al2O3 (JRC-ALO8, The Catalytic Society of Japan) were used as a nickel source and a support material, respectively. The following nitrates were applied as additive sources: Y(NO3)3·6H2O (Sigma–Aldrich, Co.), La(NO3)3·6H2O (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.), Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.), Pr(NO3)3·6H2O (Sigma–Aldrich, Co.),

Textural properties of modified Ni/Al2O3 catalysts

The crystal structure of the catalysts after calcination at 500 °C was examined by XRD analysis, and the results are shown in Fig. 1. The diffraction patterns mainly consisted of the peaks attributable to NiO and Al2O3 phases for the as-calcined catalysts other than the Ce-modified one. No characteristic diffraction lines of rare-earth elements were observed in their patterns, implying that rare-earth compounds were in the amorphous state or too small in size to be detected by XRD analysis. In

Conclusions

The ammonia decomposition over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts modified by rare-earth elements was investigated to elucidate the effect of additives on the catalytic activity. The addition of rare-earth elements promoted the decomposition reaction. Among the modified catalysts prepared, the La-modified catalyst exhibited the highest activity. For the La-modified catalyst, the optimal calcination and reduction temperatures were 400 °C and 600 °C, respectively.

The Ni dispersion was not improved by the addition

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI), Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “Energy Carrier” (Funding agency: JST).

References (31)

  • T.V. Choudhary et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2002)
  • S.F. Yin et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2004)
  • Z. Zhao et al.

    J. Rare Earths

    (2013)
  • B. Lorenzut et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2012)
  • S.F. Yin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2004)
  • S.J. Wang et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2004)
  • D. Szmigiel et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2004)
  • S.F. Yin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • L. Yao et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2011)
  • L.H. Yao et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • X.K. Li et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • Q.F. Deng et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2012)
  • H. Muroyama et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2012)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2005)
  • W. Zheng et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (100)

    • Ammonia emission control using membranes

      2024, Progresses in Ammonia: Science, Technology and Membranes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text