Large momentum part of a strongly correlated Fermi gas
Section snippets
The theorem
Consider an arbitrary number of fermions with mass m in two spin states and , having an s-wave contact interaction with large scattering length a ([1]) between opposite spin states, and confined by any external potential . To discuss their momentum distribution, it is convenient to use a box with volume and impose a periodic boundary condition. For a large uniform gas, is its actual volume; but for a gas confined in a trap, it is better to use (conceptually) a very large box
The proof
Although the theorem can be proved with conventional means as well, we shall use the formalism developed in [4]. This formalism, as we shall see below, allows us to prove this universal theorem in a universal (and simple) way.
The basis of the formalism developed in [4] is a pair of linearly independent generalized functions and , satisfyingThere is no contradiction at all, because the integrals of
Two-body case: a conventional proof
It is cumbersome to prove the above theorem with conventional means. Here we just demonstrate the two-body case, and then sketch the extension to the N-body cases. This shall help to convince the readers that the adiabatic sweep theorem is indeed correct, even if they are not used to the succinct (and “unconventional”) proof in the last section.
Now consider two fermions in opposite spin states with an external potential . We consider an energy eigenstate described by a wave function
Physical meaning
The meaning of Eq. (1) is intuitively clear. If we tune the inverse scattering length slightly and slowly, quantum mechanical first-order perturbation determines the amount by which the energy level shifts. In the limit of zero effective interaction radius, two fermions (in opposite spin states) do not interact unless they appear at the same position, so the energy shift should be proportional to the probability that this occurs. Meanwhile, characterizes this probability [4]; recall that
Acknowledgments
The author thanks T.L. Ho for a stimulating suggestion, and thanks E. Braaten for comments. He also thanks K. Levin for the introduction to ultracold Fermi gases, and S. Giorgini for communication.
References (50)
Sov. Phys. JETP
(1961)Phys. Rev. A
(2004)- S. Tan,...
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2005)- C.A. Regal, et al.,...
Phys. Lett. A
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rep.
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev.
Sov. Phys. JETP
Phys. Rev. A
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Europhys. Lett.
Cited by (711)
Exploring Short-Range Correlations in symmetric nuclei: Insights into contacts and entanglement entropy
2024, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsFew-body Bose gases in low dimensions—A laboratory for quantum dynamics
2023, Physics ReportsUniversal many-body properties of one-dimensional mass-imbalanced highly polarized Fermi gases
2023, Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State PhysicsThermal-contact capacity of one-dimensional attractive Gaudin-Yang model
2024, Chinese Physics BUniversal dynamic scaling and Contact dynamics in quenched quantum gases
2024, Frontiers of PhysicsThermal fading of the 1/k4 tail of the momentum distribution induced by the hole anomaly
2024, Physical Review A