Elsevier

Annals of Physics

Volume 323, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages 49-60
Annals of Physics

A remark on quantum gravity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2007.06.005Get rights and content

Abstract

We discuss the structure of Dyson–Schwinger equations in quantum gravity and conclude in particular that all relevant skeletons are of first order in the loop number. There is an accompanying sub-Hopf algebra on gravity amplitudes equivalent to identities between n-graviton scattering amplitudes which generalize the Slavnov–Taylor identities. These identities map the infinite number of charges and finite numbers of skeletons in gravity to an infinite number of skeletons and a finite number of charges needing renormalization. Our analysis suggests that gravity, regarded as a probability conserving but perturbatively non-renormalizable theory, is renormalizable after all, thanks to the structure of its Dyson–Schwinger equations.

Introduction

A renormalizable theory poses a computational problem for a theoretical physicist: even if only a finite number of amplitudes need renormalization, the quantum equations of motion—the Dyson–Schwinger equations (DSE)—ensure that these amplitudes must be calculated as iterated integrals based on a skeleton expansion for the Green functions. There is an infinite series of skeletons, of growing computational complexity, and thus a formidable challenge at hand. Order is brought to this situation by the fact that the skeletons can be organized in terms of the underlying Hochschild cohomology of the Hopf algebra of a renormalizable theory, the computational challenge remains though in the analytic determination of the skeletons and their Mellin transforms [1], [2], [3]. This approach, combining the analysis of the renormalization group provided in [4] with the analysis of the mathematical structure of DSE provided in [5], [6], [1], has led to new methods in solving DSE beyond perturbation theory [5], [2], [3].

A nice fact is that internal symmetries can be systematically understood in terms of this Hochschild cohomology: Slavnov–Taylor identities are equivalent to the demand that multiplicative renormalization is compatible with the cohomology structure [7], leading to the identification of Hopf ideals generated by these very Ward and Slavnov–Taylor identities [8].

For a non-renormalizable theory the situation is worse: the computational challenge for the theorist is repeated infinitely as there is now an infinite number of amplitudes demanding renormalization, each of them still based on an infinite number of possible skeleton iterations.

But the interplay with Hochschild cohomology leads to surprising new insights into this situation, which in this first paper we discuss at an elementary level for the situation of pure gravity.

Section snippets

The structure of Dyson–Schwinger equations

To compare the situation for a renormalizable QFT with the situation for an unrenormalizable one, we consider QED in four and six dimensions of spacetime.

Gravity

We consider pure gravity understood as a theory based on a graviton propagator and n-graviton couplings as vertices. A fuller discussion incorporating ghosts and matter fields is referred to future work.

An immediate observation concerns powercounting in such a theory. If we work with Feynman rules as given in [11], we see that each n-graviton vertex is a quadric in momenta attached to the vertex. This has an immediate consequence.

Corollary 2

LetΓ = k. Then ω(Γ) = 2(Γ + 1).

Proof

A 1PI one-loop graph has as many

Remarks and conclusions

We finish this short paper with a few remarks concerning the structure of theories with a powercounting as above such that propagators and vertices cancel in their contributions to the superficial degree of divergence. We call theories with such a powercounting leg-renormalizable, to contrast them from the ordinary (loop)-renormalizable theories.

Acknowledgments

It is a pleasure to thank David Broadhurst, John Gracey and Karen Yeats for discussions.

References (14)

  • D. Kreimer et al.

    Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.

    (2006)
  • D.J. Broadhurst et al.

    Nucl. Phys. B

    (2001)
  • D. Kreimer

    Ann. Phys.

    (2006)
  • D.J. Broadhurst et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1996)
  • D. Kreimer, in: I. Binder, D. Kreimer (Eds.), Universality and Renormalization, Fields Inst. Comm., AMS, vol. 50, 2007,...
  • D. Kreimer, K. Yeats, Available from:...
  • A. Connes et al.

    Commun. Math. Phys.

    (2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (44)

  • Algebraic Structures in the Coupling of Gravity to Gauge Theories

    2021, Annals of Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    We stress that by QGR we mean a quantization of GR using QFT methods, whereas by QG we mean any theory of quantized gravitation, such as e.g. Loop Quantum Gravity, String Theory or Supergravity. In this article we continue the work on perturbative QGR as started by D. Kreimer in the 2000s [10,11]. D. Kreimer used the modern techniques of Hopf algebraic renormalization developed by A. Connes and himself in the 1990s and 2000s [12–16].

  • On quantum gravity, asymptotic safety and paramagnetic dominance

    2013, International Journal of Modern Physics D
  • Gauge Symmetries and Renormalization

    2022, Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry
View all citing articles on Scopus

Talk given at “NCG-Conference in honor of Alain Connes”, Paris, 29/03/07–06/04/07, dedicated to Alain in friendship and gratitude. Work supported in parts by Grant NSF-DMS/0603781. Author supported by CNRS.

View full text