Elsevier

Annals of Nuclear Energy

Volume 92, June 2016, Pages 136-149
Annals of Nuclear Energy

Evaluation of thermal hydraulic safety of a nuclear fuel assembly in a mast assembly of nuclear power plant

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.033Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Thermal–hydraulic safety of spent fuel bundles in a mast assembly was studied.

  • Benchmark CFD calculations were compared with two sets of experimental data.

  • CFD flow analysis for natural convection was performed in the mast assembly.

  • Safety evaluation of a fuel bundle was done using a 1-D safety analysis code.

Abstract

We investigated the thermal–hydraulic safety of spent fuel bundles installed in a mast assembly, assuming a lock-up accident of a fuel transfer system. For this, flow analysis with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for the natural convection and subsequent safety evaluation with 1-D Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) safety analysis code were carried out. Prior to the natural convection analysis for the mast assembly using CFD code, we performed benchmark calculations against two experimental data sets obtained by Betts and Bokhari (2000) and PNL (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, 1980). This was done to select the proper physical models for a natural convection flow analysis and to ensure the reliability of prediction of natural convection flow in the fuel bundle geometry. Finally, we performed a main natural convection analysis for the fuel assembly inside the mast assembly. From this calculation, we observed a stable natural circulation flow between the mast assembly and pool side, and obtained coolant velocity at the inlet of the spent fuel bundle. This flow condition is given as a boundary condition for the 1-D NPP safety analysis code, which is used to predict the Critical Heat Flux and then departure from the nucleate boiling ratio.

Introduction

In typical Korean Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), a third of the nuclear fuel is replaced roughly every 18 months, depending on the burning of the fuel. Refueling is completed by removing the old nuclear fuel and then installing the new fuel in the reactor by a fuel-handling system, after a cold shutdown of the NPP. The fuel replacement system consists of a refueling machine, a fuel-transfer system, a fuel elevator installed in the containment, a new fuel elevator, and a spent-fuel handling system in an independent fuel storage building. The mast assembly is composed of a hoist box and mast (see Fig. 1) and is the major equipment used to protect fuel assemblies from damage and to transfer them during the refueling process. In this study, we studied the thermal hydraulic safety of fuel bundles installed in the mast assembly.

Under nominal conditions, the mast assembly containing the spent fuel bundle is moved in a pool in which decay heat is transferred from the spent fuel to the coolant by natural convection. If the amount of decay heat removed is insufficient, the spent fuel can melt down as the fuel rods of the core did in the Fukushima Daiichi accident. The thermal–hydraulic safety of the mast assembly therefore should be evaluated under the conditions existing in a postulated failure of the fuel transfer system.

Safety evaluation and flow analyses for the nuclear spent fuel bundle in the pool were performed by previous investigators with one dimensional (1-D) best estimated safety analysis codes and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes.

Kaliatka et al. (2010) used a best-estimate system thermal hydraulic code, RELAP5, to evaluate the evaporation of coolant, uncovering, and heat-up processes of spent fuel assemblies, in a scenario assuming a ‘loss of heat removal’ accident in the spent fuel pool of the Lithuania Ignalina NPP (Nuclear Power Plant). Wang et al. (2012) also performed a thermal hydraulics analysis of the spent fuel pool for Chinshan NPP (China) by employing both the system analysis code TRACE and CFD code. In et al. (2013), performed benchmark calculations of Multichannel Analyzer for steady states and Transients in Rod Arrays (MATRA), MARS (Multi-dimensional Analysis of Reactor Safety), and CFX-10 codes against the 8-by-8 fuel bundle tests by Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation (NUPEC) of Japan. They reported that MATRA and MARS showed reasonable capability for calculation of the void fraction in the subchannel. In contrast, CFX-10 showed lower void fraction prediction results than found in the experimental data. M. E. Conner et al. (2012) validated their single-phase CFD methodology with STAR-CD in the 5-by-5 subchannel which simulates a PWR fuel bundle under operating conditions. Moon et al. (2005) benchmarked MARS code for the prediction of Critical Heat Flux (CHF) and reported that the maximum uncertainty of the predicted CHF with Look-Up Table (LUT) method is 25% in the 3 × 3 bundle under the low mass flux condition. In addition to these, efforts were also made to apply CFD code to multi-dimensional two-phase flow analyses for the fuel bundle. Tentner et al., 2005, Tentner et al., 2007 proposed advanced two-phase flow models using CFD code, for the analysis of the Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) fuel assembly. Lo and Osman (2012) applied 3-D CFD methodology to predict the boiling two-phase flow in one of the PSBT 5 × 5 rod bundle tests.

For safety issues regarding spent fuel in the storage system, requirements (Ryu, 2009) are suggested by KINS (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety), the regulatory body in South Korea. The requirements are as follows: (1) Spent fuels must be cooled in water under all conditions. (2) The top of the fuel must be located at least 3 m below from the surface in the case of failure of the inlet, outlet, or piping equipment. (3) The coolant must be maintained at temperature of less than 60 °C.

In this study, we tried to evaluate the safety of spent nuclear fuel inside a MAST assembly for Korean Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400) in a postulated accident. For this, we assumed that the mast assembly stopped in the pool for a given reason (e.g., mechanical failure or loss of electricity) during transfer of the spent fuel, and then appraised the safety of the spent fuel. To evaluate the thermal–hydraulic safety under the conditions of the assumed accident, we first tried to investigate whether the natural convection flow was sufficient to transfer decay heat from the spent fuel to the coolant. This was done using CFD code and then by quantifying the thermal margin by calculation of the CHF using the best-estimate NPP safety-analysis code. The overall strategy for these evaluations is summarized in Fig. 2. As shown in the figure, the STAR-CCM+ Ver. 9.02., a commercial CFD code was at first benchmarked against two sets of experimental data. This was done for selection of the proper physical models, development of an optimized calculation mesh, and validation of the prediction capability for the subchannel under natural convection flow. Then, this was applied to the natural convection flow analysis of the spent fuel in the pool. Through the analysis, we confirmed stable natural convection flow in the pool and then calculated the inlet velocity of coolant in the accident condition. Subsequently, the CHF was predicted by the (Jeong et al., 1999) code developed by KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) using the inlet velocity of coolant as a boundary condition. Finally, the thermal–hydraulic safety was quantified by calculating the departure from the nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) under these flow conditions.

Section snippets

Benchmark calculations of CFD code for natural convection flow

In the present study, the commercially available CFD code, STAR-CCM+, was chosen for analysis of the natural convection flow of the mast assembly located in the containment pool. In the CFD analysis, applying a proper turbulent model is requisite for successful flow analysis. In the conventional CFD codes, a turbulence model such as Detached Eddy Simulation, kε, kω, or the Reynolds Stress Model based on Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes is available. The main shortcoming of flow analysis is

Modeling

As mentioned earlier, the main application of the CFD is for the mast assembly, which includes a 16 × 16 spent fuel assembly for APR1400, as shown in Fig. 1. The geometry of the fuel assembly is complicated because it is composed of 16 × 16 rod bundles, spacer grids, a mixing vane, control rod guide tubes, and other structures. If all components were simulated in detail, a large number of fine mesh cells would be required. Also, the fine mesh can degrade the numerical stability of 3-D calculations,

Input model for 1-D safety analysis code

The input deck was prepared to calculate the CHF at a given inlet velocity by MARS, which is a safety analysis code for nuclear power plants.

Conclusions

In the present study, a numerical investigation was conducted to quantitatively evaluate the thermal–hydraulic safety of a spent fuel assembly during a postulated accident involving the mast assembly using a commercial CFD code and a 1-D safety analysis code (MARS). Before conducting CFD analysis for the mast assembly, calculations for two benchmark problems were performed to select the proper physical models (such as a turbulence model) for analysis of natural convection flow and to ensure the

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Nuclear Research & Development Program of the NRF (National Research Foundation of Korea) grant funded by the MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) and the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS), granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (Grant code: NRF-2015M2B2A9029358, No.1305011).

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

  • Modeling and validation of RELAP5 for natural circulation flow in a single PWR fuel assembly

    2021, Annals of Nuclear Energy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to its large size, the structural features of fuel assemblies are often ignored due to their relatively small size, and the method of emerging multiple fuel assemblies as a whole domain is adopted (Kaliatka et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017). In contrast, the transport or storage containers used for dry storage are much smaller in size, with only one (Kim et al., 2016) or dozens of assemblies (Greene et al., 2013) per unit. Therefore, it is feasible and necessary to model the geometric structure more precisely.

  • Semi-analytical model of the vertical impact of a 316 stainless steel rod

    2020, International Journal of Impact Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    For instance, in references [9,10], the rod had a length of 304 mm with a diameter of 17.6 mm. However, the aspect ratio (i.e., length/diameter ratio) of a long rod under various conditions cannot be ignored, and a typical rod used for a nuclear assembly has an aspect ratio of approximately 40, as discussed in references [30,31], and the vibration response during impact cannot be ignored. In the present study, a theoretical model was developed to assess the vertical impact of 316 stainless steel (SS316) rods with a large aspect ratio.

  • INVESTIGATION ON A COMPLETE PASSIVE COOLING SYSTEM USING LARGE-SCALE SEPARATE HEAT PIPES IN SPENT FUEL POOL

    2022, International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, ICONE
1

Current address: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Department of Reactor System Evaluation, 62 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-338, South Korea.

View full text