Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 85, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 305-312
Animal Behaviour

Essay
Eighteen reasons animal behaviourists avoid involvement in conservation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.007Get rights and content

We summarize 18 common misgivings that animal behaviourists raise about becoming involved in conservation. We argue that many of the supposed institutional and interdisciplinary differences break down under scrutiny; that the supposed basic-applied dichotomy is often imaginary or insufficient to prevent interchange of ideas between behaviour and conservation; and that arguments about professional lifestyle, scientific inflexibility and despair are not adequate justifications for remaining on the sidelines. We suggest that many studies of animal behaviour are relevant to solving conservation problems, and we therefore encourage behaviourists to contribute more strongly to finding practical solutions to the contemporary conservation crisis.

Highlights

► We collate 18 common misgivings that animal behaviourists raise about becoming involved in conservation. ► Many misgivings are specious or half-truths; many studies of animal behaviour are relevant to solving conservation problems. ► We encourage animal behaviourists to be bolder in addressing the current conservation crisis.

Section snippets

(1) ‘My university does not reward applied biology’

This comment might have been valid two decades ago, but today most academic institutions (especially land grant colleges) have specific faculty positions in conservation biology or environmental science, as well as in animal behaviour. Many institutions have entire departments of applied biology centred on wildlife and conservation (North America) and natural resources and population management (Europe), and there are a good number of endowed chairs in conservation biology. Moreover, there is

(8) ‘I earned my Ph.D. in animal behaviour; I don't know anything about conservation or wildlife biology’

Anyone who studies behaviours of free-living organisms has valuable knowledge of the ecological and social pressures that act on them. Therefore, behaviourists understand some fundamental issues in wildlife biology. Consider a sexually selected trait shaped by female choice. Its exaggeration may be limited by predation pressure that itself may be affected by anthropogenic change. Or consider territorial establishment, the timing of which may be affected by global warming. Or a cryptic

(13) ‘I'm too busy to devote precious time to conservation activities’

We are all desperately busy. Laypeople with knowledge of how academic biologists work and live sometimes find it difficult to comprehend what drives their dedication. But an academic biologist's days are not spent entirely on research and teaching; there are meetings to attend, students to advise, manuscripts to review and grant applications to write. A portion of this time could be redirected to a conservation activity, such as conducting research on how to extricate one's own study organism

Conclusion

In this essay, we have raised and attempted to address 18 general concerns of animal behaviourists about becoming more involved in conservation. We believe that many of these misgivings are specious or are excuses for not tackling problems associated with saving the natural world. We hope that by addressing these issues head on we will motivate readers of Animal Behaviour to be bolder about applying their intellect, love of nature and knowledge to help address the current conservation crisis.

Acknowledgments

Conversations with Tom Seeley inadvertently provided the impetus to write this essay. For comments on the manuscript we thank him, Dan Blumstein, Janet Sherman, Andy Sih, Tim Wright and an anonymous reviewer.

References (111)

  • J.M. Emlen et al.

    Interaction assessment: a modeling tool for predicting population dynamics from field data

    Ecological Modelling

    (2006)
  • R. Frankham

    Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation

    Biological Conservation

    (2010)
  • W.D. Hamilton

    The genetical theory of social behaviour. II

    Journal of Theoretical Biology

    (1964)
  • H.K. Lotze et al.

    Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (2011)
  • A.P. Møller et al.

    Conservation consequences of Chernobyl and other nuclear accidents

    Biological Conservation

    (2011)
  • K.E. Moseby et al.

    Can predator avoidance training improve reintroduction outcomes for the greater bilby in arid Australia?

    Animal Behaviour

    (2012)
  • R.L. Pressey et al.

    Conservation planning in a changing world

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (2007)
  • D.J. Rankin et al.

    The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (2007)
  • J. Schroeder et al.

    Behavioral ecology is not an endangered discipline

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (2011)
  • M.A. Schlaepfer et al.

    Ecological and evolutionary traps

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (2002)
  • H.B. Shaffer et al.

    The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution

    (1998)
  • M. Barua et al.

    Selecting flagships for invertebrate conservation

    Biodiversity and Conservation

    (2012)
  • M.S. Bass et al.

    Global conservation significance of Ecuador's Yasuni National Park

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • P. Bateson et al.

    Physiological effects of hunting red deer (Cervus elaphus)

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B

    (1997)
  • J. Battin

    When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations

    Conservation Biology

    (2004)
  • S.R. Beissinger et al.

    Population Viability Analysis

    (2002)
  • W.A. Bennett

    Critical assessment of the delta smelt population in the San Francisco estuary, California

    San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science

    (2005)
  • O. Berger-Tal et al.

    Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework

    Behavioral Ecology

    (2011)
  • D. Blumstein et al.

    A Primer on Conservation Behaviour

    (2010)
  • C. Both et al.

    Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird

    Nature

    (2001)
  • C. Brown

    Experience and learning in changing environments

  • R.B. Bury

    Natural history, field ecology, conservation biology, and wildlife management: time to connect the dots

    Herpetological Conservation and Biology

    (2006)
  • U. Candolin et al.

    Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences

    (2012)
  • C. Carey

    How physiological methods and concepts can be useful in conservation biology

    Integrative and Comparative Biology

    (2005)
  • T. Caro

    Conservation by Proxy: Indicator, Umbrella, Keystone, Flagship and Other Surrogate Species

    (2010)
  • T. Caro

    Biodiversity: need for balanced reports of solutions and failures

    Nature

    (2010)
  • T. Caro et al.

    Vanishing behaviors

    Conservation Letters

    (2012)
  • A. Charmantier et al.

    Adaptive phenoptypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population

    Science

    (2008)
  • L.-M. Chevin et al.

    Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory

    PLoS Biology

    (2010)
  • V. Christensen et al.

    Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes

    Fish and Fisheries

    (2003)
  • R.W. Clark et al.

    Roads, interrupted dispersal, and genetic diversity in timber rattlesnakes

    Conservation Biology

    (2010)
  • B. Clucas et al.

    Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines

    Biodiversity and Conservation

    (2008)
  • P.F.M. Coesel

    A method for quantifying conservation value in lentic freshwater habitats using desmids as indicator organisms

    Biodiversity and Conservation

    (2001)
  • D.W. Coltman et al.

    Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting

    Nature

    (2003)
  • A. Coulon et al.

    Effects of habitat fragmentation on effective dispersal of Florida scrubjays

    Conservation Biology

    (2010)
  • M.B. Davis et al.

    Evolutionary responses to changing climate

    Ecology

    (2005)
  • Z. Dolenec et al.

    Warmer springs, laying date and clutch size of tree sparrows Passer montanus in Croatia

    Current Zoology

    (2011)
  • C.A. Donnelly et al.

    Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle

    Nature

    (2006)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Predator-awareness training in terrestrial vertebrates: Progress, problems and possibilities

      2020, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Difficulties in sample size, control groups and experimental design are driven by the problems of conducting experiments with rare and valuable animals. Limitations in resources and time mean that it is not necessarily practical for conservation organizations to run methodologically robust studies themselves, as their attention is necessarily focussed on the preservation of specific threatened populations (Caro and Sherman, 2013; Greggor et al., 2014; Hogg et al., 2017). There may also be differing interests in outcome between managers and researchers, as best practice for preserving a specific cohort or population may not be the best approach for acquiring the most informative data, while methods and outcomes from academic studies may not necessarily be applicable or practical for use in a management setting (Caro and Sherman, 2013; Greggor et al., 2016; Hogg et al., 2017).

    • Trends and perspectives on the use of animal social network analysis in behavioural ecology: a bibliometric approach

      2019, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among behavioural ecologists, understanding conservation implications for species is often cited as an important conclusion of empirical work. Meanwhile, several recent reviews have also highlighted the relative complacency of behavioural ecologists in a conservation context (Caro & Sherman, 2011, 2013), and our findings generally support these views. Despite the paucity of studies quantifying social networks for species of conservation concern, it may not be reasonable to have expected a large number of studies on these species.

    • Applications of Animal Behavior to Conservation

      2019, Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Second Edition: Volume 1-5
    • Connecting animal and human cognition to conservation

      2017, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Scientists studying the cognition and behavior of animals have been slow to engage with today’s pressing need to conserve the very species we find so fascinating. The usual reasons for this reticence, including perceived lack of scientific rigor in applied studies, are easily dismissed [62], and the above examples illustrate many ways in which high caliber research can inform conservation action. We have stressed the utility of research into the learning abilities of animals because these capacities directly affect behavioral flexibility, which is important to a population’s viability in a changing world [63].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    E-mail address: [email protected] (P. W. Sherman).

    View full text