ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Animal Behaviour
Volume 71, Issue 3, March 2006, Pages 685-693
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (225 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Regulation of space use in a solitary felid: population density or prey availability?

John F. Benson*, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Michael J. Chamberlain*, 1 and Bruce D. Leopold, 2

*School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, U.S.A. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, U.S.A.

Received 5 May 2005; 
revised 1 August 2005; 
accepted 24 August 2005. 
MS. number: A10150R. 
Available online 13 February 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Home range size in birds and mammals appears to be influenced by a number of factors including food availability, body mass and population density. However, few studies have convincingly shown population density to influence the extent of space use in a population of free-ranging carnivores without a corresponding increase in food availability. We investigated the relative effects of food availability, body weight and increased density on the size of adult bobcat, Lynx rufus, home ranges and core areas in Mississippi, U.S.A. during 1989–1997. We observed an increase in population density and a decrease in annual mean home range and core area sizes for males and females during this 9-year study. Population density explained 64% and 56% of the variation in home range size for males and females, respectively, whereas food availability and body weight failed to explain the observed reduction in bobcat home range size. Population density was also the most important variable explaining variation in core areas for both sexes, although food availability also appeared to contribute to variation, especially for females. We suggest that population density should be considered along with energy acquisition and metabolic factors such as food availability and body size when investigating variability in home range and core area sizes of mammals.

Article Outline

Methods
Study Area
Bobcat Captures
Telemetry
Home Range and Core Area Estimation
Space Use Overlap
Bobcat Density Estimation
Prey Availability
Habitat Use and Availability
Statistical Analyses
Results
Variation in Annual Space Use Estimates
Relationships between Density and Prey Abundance, Habitat Availability and Use
Relationship between Density and Space Use Overlap
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References



Animal Behaviour
Volume 71, Issue 3, March 2006, Pages 685-693
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.