Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.035Get rights and content

Section snippets

Disclosures

Dr. Meier has served on the Speakers Bureau for Abbott, has received speaker fees from Abbott, and has served as a co-primary investigator of the PC trial. All other investigators report no relations relevant to the contents of this letter to disclose.

Acknowledgment

None.

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (4)

  • Leaving (almost) nothing behind

    2023, Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
  • Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: Randomized Trial Update

    2019, Interventional Cardiology Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is highly reassuring that most of these new atrial arrhythmia events were consisted of a single isolated episode, occurred during or early (<30 days) after the procedure, and rarely led to a recurrent cerebrovascular event or required long-term anticoagulation. Only 5 out of 1889 (∼0.1%) patients in all 6 trials developed recurrent stroke attributed to device-associated atrial fibrillation, and 3 of these cases were with the STARFlex device that is no longer commercially available.17,64–66 Therefore, the stroke risk that this type of atrial fibrillation conveys seems to be minimal, and most of the patients do not require long-term anticoagulation (eg, 70% of the patients in CLOSE who developed device-associated atrial fibrillation eventually had their anticoagulation discontinued).35–37,46–48

  • The full spectrum of PFO: Are we seeing just the tip of the iceberg?

    2019, Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, Peripheral Embolism, Migraine, and Hypoxemia

See page XXX for disclosure information.

View full text