Local radial point interpolation method for the fully developed magnetohydrodynamic flow
Introduction
The MHD flow has been applied in more broad fields than ever such as the cooling system with liquid metals for nuclear fission or fusion reactors, electromagnetic pumps, MHD generators. It is very important to devise effective numerical methods to obtain the approximate solutions of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow problem since the exact solution can be achieved only in some special cases [1].
The methods for solving the MHD problems are mostly based on mesh, such as the finite difference method (FDM) [2], [3] and the finite-element method (FEM) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. The common characteristic for these methods is that the quality of mesh has a great impact on the computed results. However, sometimes the high-quality meshes are hard to be generated for the irregular shape of computed area and the procedure of generating mesh consumes much time and labor. Then the meshless methods, which don’t need any mesh production, become more and more attractive nowadays.
Many meshless methods have been proposed and employed in several fields in recent years, such as reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM) [10], the partition of unity finite-element method (PUFEM) [11], Hp-cloud method [12], natural element method (NEM) [13], Mesh-free radial basis function method [14], [15], the meshless local weak–strong (MLWS) method [16], local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method [17], [18]. Some of them have been applied in MHD problems. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (SPH) was first introduced in 1977 by Lucy [19], Gingold [20] in the context of astrophysical phenomena. SPH has been used in MHD Poiseuille flow by Jiang [21]. Børve applied SPH to analyze multidimensional MHD shock [22]. The meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method was first proposed by Atluri and Zhu [23], and later discussed deeply in Atluri and shen [24], [25]. Dehghan analyzed unsteady MHD flow through a duct with arbitrary wall conductivity with MLPG [26]. Belytschko et al. [27] proposed the element-free Galerkin (EFG) method and applied it to elasticity and heat conduction problems. Verardi applied the element-free Galerkin method [28] to study the fully developed MHD duct flows. Dehghan employed the LBIE method [18] to deal with the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic flow in rectangular and circular pipes.
The local radial point interpolation method (LRPIM) is proposed by Liu [29]. In LRPIM, the point interpolation with the radial basis functions is used to construct shape functions with the delta function property. The LRPIM has been applied for two-dimensional static analyses [29], free vibration analyses of two-dimensional solids [30], numerical simulation of two-dimensional sine–Gordon equation [31] and dissipation process of excess pore water pressure [32]. Very good results have been obtained.
LRPIM for two-dimensional fully developed MHD flow analyses are presented in this paper. Local weak forms are developed using weighted residual method locally for the MHD governing equations. The essential boundary conditions can be easily implemented in MHD analyses because the shape functions possess the delta function property. A number of numerical solutions of MHD analyses are presented and compared with the exact solutions [1] for the flow in an insulated duct. Furthermore, numerical solutions are also obtained for arbitrary wall conductivity and oblique applied magnetic field.
The organization of the rest of this paper is as follows: In Section 2 the basic equations are presented. In Section 3 a brief discussion of point interpolation using radial basis functions is outlined. In Section 4 a local weak form of LRPIM for the fully developed MHD flow is presented. In Section 5 the discretized equations of MHD flow are obtained. The numerical results are reported in Section 6. Finally some concluding remarks are given in Section 7.
Section snippets
Transverse magnetic field
The geometry of the duct is shown in Fig. 1, where the external applied magnetic field B0 is along the x-axis, the y-axis is perpendicular to it and lying in a section, the z-axis is along the axial direction in which the flow is taking place for Newtonian fluid of constant physical properties driven by a constant pressure gradient.
The following non-dimensional variables and parameters are introduced as:where η, σ1 are the
Point interpolation using radial basis functions
Consider a continuous function u(x) defined on a two-dimensional domain Ω with a set of suitably located nodes in it. An interpolation of u(x) in the neighborhood of a point xq using radial basis functions (RBFs) and polynomial basis is written as:where Ri(x) is a radial basis function associated with node i, pj(x) is a monomial in the space coordinates xT = [x, y], n is the number of nodes in the neighborhood of xq, m is the number of monomial basis
Local weak form of LRPIM for the fully developed MHD flow
A local weak form of Eqs. (1), (2) over a local sub-domain Ωq can be obtained using the weighted residual methodwhere wi is the test function of node i.
The support sub-domain of a node xi is a domain in which w(xi) ≠ 0. These local sub-domains do not form a contiguous mesh globally; but these disjointed local sub-domains may overlap each other. An arbitrary shape of support domain can be used. A rectangular support domain is used in this paper for
Discretized equations
Consider N nodal points on the boundary and domain of the problem. Some of them are distributed across the global boundary Γ. The problem domain Ω is represented by properly scattered nodes. The point interpolation approximations (38), (39), (40), (41) are used to approximate the values of a point xq.
Substituting Eqs. (38), (39), (40), (41) into the local weak form (34), (35) for all nodes and imposing natural boundary conditions lead to the following discrete system equations:
Numerical results
We have taken a long duct of square cross-section defined by ∣X∣ ⩽ 1 and ∣Y∣ ⩽ 1 for this problem. Velocity and induced magnetic field across the section have been evaluated and graphed for different values of M, θ and α. In this paper, the linear monomial basis is used as pT(x) = [1, x, y]. The calculations are performed using N = 51 × 51, ac = 4.0, q = 1.03.
Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 present the numerical solutions of velocity and magnetic field, when θ = ∞ for some selected points forM = 5, 30 and 50,
Conclusion
In this paper, a local radial point interpolation method (LRPIM) is applied to the fully developed MHD flow problem in a straight duct. The numerical solutions are compared with the Shercliff’s exact solutions under the condition that the duct walls are insulated for different Hartmann numbers. With different wall conductivities and different orientations of external applied magnetic fields, the velocity and induced magnetic fields are also presented. LRPIM is a truly meshless method, which
References (37)
- et al.
The finite element method for MHD flow at high Hartmann numbers
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
(2005) - et al.
A finite element method for magnetohydrodynamics
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
(2001) - et al.
Generalized multiple scale reproducing kernel particle methods
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
(1996) - et al.
Hp-cloud – a meshless method to solve boundary-value problems
Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.
(1996) - et al.
A numerical method for solution of the two-dimensional sine-Gordon equation using the radial basis functions
Math. Comput. Simulat.
(2008) - et al.
Numerical solution of the nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation using radial basis functions
J. Comput. Appl. Math.
(2009) - et al.
Combination of meshless local weak and strong (MLWS) forms to solve the two-dimensional hyperbolic telegraph equation
Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem.
(2010) - et al.
Meshless local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method for the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow in rectangular and circular pipes
Comput. Phys. Commun.
(2009) - et al.
Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method for the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow through pipe with arbitrary wall conductivity
Appl. Numer. Math.
(2009) A Local Radial point interpolation method (LRPIM) for free vibration analyses of 2D solids
J. Sound Vibr.
(2001)
Numerical simulation of two-dimensional sine–Gordon solitons via a local weak meshless technique based on the radial point interpolation method (RPIM)
Comput. Phys. Commun.
Solution of magnetohydrodynamic flow in a rectangular duct by differential quadrature method
Comput. Fluids
Multiquadrics – A scattered data approximation scheme with application to computational fluid dynamics
Comput. Math. Appl.
Application of the multiquadric method for numerical solution of elliptic partial differential equations
Appl. Math. Comput.
Steady motion of conducting fluids in pipes under transverse magnetic fields
Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.
MHD axial flow in a triangular pipe under transverse magnetic field
Ind. J. Pure Appl. Math.
MHD axial flow in a triangular pipe under transverse magnetic field parallel to a side of the triangle
Ind. J. Tech.
Finite element method in MHD channel flow problems
Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.
Cited by (17)
Numerical investigation of the magnetic properties and behavior of electrically conducting fluids via the local weak form method
2022, Applied Mathematics and ComputationNumerical study of the unsteady 2D coupled magneto-hydrodynamic equations on regular/irregular pipe using direct meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method
2022, Applied Mathematics and ComputationError analysis and numerical simulation of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) equation based on the interpolating element free Galerkin (IEFG) method
2019, Applied Numerical MathematicsCitation Excerpt :The main aim of the paper [1] is to combine the alternative direction implicit (ADI) approach with the interpolation element free Galerkin method for solving two-dimensional distributed order time-fractional diffusion-wave equation The MHD equation has been solved by using different numerical results such as the grid method [50], finite element method [2,45,51,60,66], boundary element method [4,25,46,56,59,57,58], finite difference and finite element methods [41], a new analytic finite element method [20], fundamental solution and boundary element method [5,47], interpolating MLS approximations [61], Meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method [16], local radial point interpolation method [9], localized meshless point collocation method [39], the meshless point collocation method (MPCM) [3], upwinding meshfree point collocation method [10], upwind difference schemes [26], an exponential compact difference scheme [34], the Euler semi-implicit scheme [24], the Galerkin boundary node method [54], meshfree weak-strong (MWS) form [19], meshless local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method [17], the variational multiscale element free Galerkin method [69], the method of variably scaled radial kernels [18] and other research works [42,53,55]. At first, we present some well-known notations in the functional analysis.
The method of variably scaled radial kernels for solving two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations using two discretizations: The Crank-Nicolson scheme and the method of lines (MOL)
2015, Computers and Mathematics with ApplicationsNatural element method analysis for coupled radiative and conductive heat transfer in semitransparent medium with irregular geometries
2014, International Journal of Thermal SciencesCitation Excerpt :Combination of the methods mentioned above can be used to solve the coupled radiation and conduction in multi-dimensional complex geometry. In recent years, meshless methods have emerged and been used successfully in fluid flow [9,10] and related heat transfer problems [11,12]. A common feature of the meshless methods is that the approximation is constructed in terms of discrete nodes and no predefined nodal connectivity is required.
Natural element method for solving radiative transfer with or without conduction in three-dimensional complex geometries
2013, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative TransferCitation Excerpt :Talukdar et al. [12] investigated the coupled heat transfer in several 3D enclosures using FVM. More recently meshless methods have emerged and have been used successfully in fluid flow [13,14] and related heat transfer problems [15,16]. The common meshless methods mainly include the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH), the reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM), the diffuse element method (DEM), the element-free Galerkin method (EFG), the natural element method (NEM) [17] and so on.