Meeting paperCAOG paperDelayed cord clamping with and without cord stripping: a prospective randomized trial of preterm neonates
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
This was an institutional review board–approved, prospective, randomized trial performed at the University of South Alabama Children’s and Women’s Hospital between the dates of August 2012 and November 2013.
When endeavoring a study of neonatal outcomes, it would be ideal to use long-term outcomes of morbidity and mortality as primary variables; however, the sample size required to power these analyses is a difficult task in a prospective randomized control trial; therefore, previous studies
Results
During the 15 month period of the study, 70 patients were randomized. Three patients were randomized but on final review did not meet inclusion criteria and were excluded from analysis. For the 32 patients in the control arm, receiving 30 second delayed cord clamping alone, and the 35 in the test arm, receiving 30-second delayed cord clamping plus cord stripping, birthweights and gestational ages were similar (Table). The mean birthweights were 1087 g and 1111 g, and the mean gestational ages
Comment
Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefit of delayed cord clamping for preterm neonates at less than 32 weeks’ gestation.1, 5, 6, 7 If we could find a way to further utilize the placenta as a reservoir for blood, in addition to delayed cord clamping, we possibly could see an even greater benefit. An additive beneficial effect of combining delayed cord clamping and cord stripping has been speculated, but this study leads us to conclude that an increase in hematocrit over delayed cord
References (12)
- et al.
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on iron status in Mexican infants: a randomized control trial
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Placental Transfusion and hyperbilirubinemia in the premature
Pediatrics
(1972) - et al.
The effect of timing of cord clamping on neonatal venous hematocrit values and clinical outcome at term: a randomized controlled trial
Pediatrics
(2006) - et al.
Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: a randomized controlled trial
BMJ
(2011) - et al.
Effects of delayed cord clamping in very-low-birth-weight infants
J Perinatol
(2011) - et al.
Placental transfusion umbilical cord clamping and preterm infants
J Perinatol
(2000)
Cited by (21)
2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group
2021, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :The SysRev identified 7 trials (1073 infants) for this comparison.196,224–229 For the critical outcome of survival to discharge, moderate-certainty evidence from 5 trials involving 1000 infants could not exclude benefit or harm from later cord clamping.224–226,228,229 For all other outcomes evaluated, results were similarly inconclusive.
A Comparison of Strategies for Managing the Umbilical Cord at Birth in Preterm Infants
2020, Journal of PediatricsImplementation of Delayed Cord Clamping in Vigorous Preterm Neonates
2018, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal NursingCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, the incidence of blood transfusions in preterm neonates was significantly lower as a result of the hemodynamic effects of DCC (Backes et al., 2014; Garofalo & Abenhaim, 2012; Rabe et al., 2012; WHO, 2014). An additional prominent positive outcome reported in the research was improved hematocrit levels during the first few days of life (Jelin et al., 2015; Krueger et al., 2015; Oh et al., 2011). Hence, DCC is essential to ensure hemodynamic stability in preterm neonates.
Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2018, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :About 15 million children are born <37 weeks’ gestation annually, of whom about 1 million die.4 Several publications in this journal have addressed whether enhanced placental transfusion–by delayed clamping of the umbilical cord, milking the cord before or after clamping, or a combination of these measures–can reduce adverse neonatal outcomes, including death.5-10 Delaying umbilical cord clamping may improve outcome in preterm infants by increasing the volume of blood transferred from placenta to infant11 and by allowing time for physiologic transition.12
No. 347-Obstetric Management at Borderline Viability
2017, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaCitation Excerpt :Delayed cord clamping has been adopted as an intervention to help minimize blood transfusion and improve outcomes in preterm births. Several studies and meta-analyses have shown improvement in short-term outcomes, significantly lower rates of blood transfusion, and trends towards decreased rates of IVH and sepsis in infants who underwent delayed cord clamping or cord milking.50,51 Studies reporting benefit with delayed cord clamping report protocols ranging from 20 to 180 seconds of delay.52,53
Focus on placental transfusion for preterm neonates: Delayed cord clamping and/or milking?
2016, Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Cite this article as: Krueger MS, Eyal FG, Peevy KJ, et al. Delayed cord clamping with and without cord stripping: a prospective randomized trial of preterm neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:394.e1-5.