Major article
Nosocomial transmission of Ebola virus disease on pediatric and maternity wards: Bombali and Tonkolili, Sierra Leone, 2014

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We detail two cases where transmission of EVD occurred in health care settings.

  • We describe admission and care of two EVD cases–one pediatric and one maternity.

  • Delayed EVD recognition and inadequate PPE contributed to nosocomial spread.

  • Limiting non-health care worker contact to patients may limit infection spread.

  • Routine EVD screening of admitted patients may help decrease EVD transmission.

Background

In the largest Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in history, nosocomial transmission of EVD increased spread of the disease. We report on 2 instances in Sierra Leone where patients unknowingly infected with EVD were admitted to a general hospital ward (1 pediatric ward and 1 maternity ward), exposing health care workers, caregivers, and other patients to EVD. Both patients died on the general wards, and were later confirmed as being infected with EVD. We initiated contact tracing and assessed risk factors for secondary infections to guide containment recommendations.

Methods

We reviewed medical records to establish the index patients' symptom onset. Health care workers, patients, and caregivers were interviewed to determine exposures and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. Contacts were monitored daily for EVD symptoms. Those who experienced EVD symptoms were isolated and tested.

Results

Eighty-two contacts were identified: 64 health care workers, 7 caregivers, 4 patients, 4 newborns, and 3 children of patients. Seven contacts became symptomatic and tested positive for EVD: 2 health care workers (1 nurse and 1 hospital cleaner), 2 caregivers, 2 newborns, and 1 patient. The infected nurse placed an intravenous catheter in the pediatric index patient with only short gloves PPE and the hospital cleaner cleaned the operating room of the maternity ward index patient wearing short gloves PPE. The maternity ward index patient's caregiver and newborn were exposed to her body fluids. The infected patient and her newborn shared the ward and latrine with the maternity ward index patient. Hospital staff members did not use adequate PPE. Caregivers were not offered PPE.

Conclusions

Delayed recognition of EVD and inadequate PPE likely led to exposures and secondary infections. Earlier recognition of EVD and adequate PPE might have reduced direct contact with body fluids. Limiting nonhealth-care worker contact, improving access to PPE, and enhancing screening methods for pregnant women, children, and inpatients may help decrease EVD transmission in general health care settings.

Section snippets

Bombali district

On October 8, 2014, a 29-month-old child presented with vomiting and fatigue to the pediatric outpatient center of the district's government hospital. The patient did not meet the EVD screening case definition and therefore was admitted to the general pediatric ward, where he was treated for malaria. The patient developed diarrhea later that day. On October 10, he developed fever, rash, red eyes, and melena. The patient died October 13 on the pediatric ward. Given the patient's symptoms, the

Tonkolili district

A 25-year-old full term pregnant woman presented with labor pains to her community maternity clinic on October 7, 2014. On October 9, she was transferred to the maternity ward of a general hospital due to prolonged labor where she was observed for 5 days. On October 14, the patient gave birth to a live newborn via an uncomplicated cesarean section for prolonged labor. Two days later, on October 16, she reported feeling febrile and had 1 episode of vomiting. The following day, October 17, the

Discussion

Unidentified EVD patients in non-EVD health care facilities present a significant health risk to health care workers, caregivers, and other patients.6 Effective infection prevention and control measures to reduce the risk of nosocomial transmission to health care workers and patients include improved disease screening, isolation of suspect case patients, facility engineering controls, and adherence to recommended PPE.4 In the outbreaks we describe, screening at the time of admission did not

References (11)

  • P. Kilmarx et al.

    Ebola virus disease in health care workers – Sierra Leone, 2014

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2014)
  • Laboratory Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Disease

    (September 2014)
  • Infection Control and Screening and Isolation of Suspected Ebola Patients at the Peripheral Health Units. Infection Control Guidelines and Training Manual

    (2014)
  • Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Care of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Filovirus Hemorrhagic Fever in Health-Care Settings, with Focus on Ebola

    (December 2014)
  • Sierra Leone Emergency Management Program Standard Operating Procedure for Safe, Dignified Medical Burials.

    (October 2014)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (34)

  • Ebola: A review and focus on neurologic manifestations

    2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding in the context of Ebola: a systematic review

    2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
    Citation Excerpt :

    The third surviving neonate was reportedly alive at 2 months of age, but this report has not been confirmed.17 Screening for Ebola virus disease by the use of case definitions38 was described in eight studies.4,5,15,17,18,29,30,39 The specificity of standard case definitions for Ebola virus disease in pregnant women was 16–29%,15,39 compared with 50% in the general population with Ebola virus disease.40

View all citing articles on Scopus

ACD and TAW contributed equally to this work.

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.

Conflicts of interest: None.

View full text