Brief report
Incidence of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids and measures taken by health care workers before and after exposure in regional hospitals of a developing country: A multicenter study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The study has been done in the domain of occupational exposure in regional hospitals of Northern Khorasan province in Iran showed that:

  • The incidence of exposure to sharp objects was 44% and the incidence of contact with blood or other secretions of patients was 31%.

  • Among healthcare workers (HCWs) who had needle stick injuries, 82 had a positive hepatitis B surface antibody titer measured after injury.

  • 35.9 % HCWs washed their hands before and after examining patients, and 41.5 % used gloves while working in hospitals.

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 371 health care workers working in government hospitals in the Northern Khorasan province of Iran. Exposure to sharp objects was 44% and 31% of participants had a history of being in contact with blood or body fluids of patients. Among health care workers who had needlestick injuries, 82 had a positive hepatitis B surface antibody titer measured after injury.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2013 among 371 HCWs, and included physicians, paramedics, and cleaning personnel. Personnel with <1 year of experience were not considered as a statistical population. The sampling method was stratified so that each public hospital in North Khorasan was considered as a group (6 hospitals from 4 cities in the Northern Khorasan province). Then, based on the personnel population ratio in each group, samples of personnel were selected

Results

Three hundred seventy-one HCWs participated in this study, and all answered the survey questions. The incidence of exposure to sharp objects was 44%, and the incidence of contact with blood or other secretions of patients was 31%. Responses indicated that 91% of HCWs always used a safety box to deposit used needles, 35.9% washed their hands before and after examining patients, and 41.5% used gloves while working in hospitals.

Fifty-eight percent reported attending training classes on handling

Discussion

There are no precise statistics on incidence of the occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in Iran. However, several studies have reported different figures in different regions of Iran. Incidence of NSI among HCWs within other regions of Iran (eg, Tehran) was reported at 53%, which is higher than the rate found in our study.5 HCWs with <1 year of working experience and students were not included in our study. This may have influenced the incidence rate.

The incidence of NSI in countries

Conclusions

Due to the high incidence of NSI, measures taken to prevent injury were not at an acceptable level and there were no consistent quality measures after NSI.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (14)

  • Multicenter cross-sectional study on the reporting status and influencing factors of needlestick injuries caused by insulin injection devices among nurses in Peking, China

    2020, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    There was less study to identify the reporting incidence of NSIs caused by insulin injection syringes, insulin pen needles, and other devices and its associated factors, including nurse characteristics and questions about reporting NSIs, as well as the reasons for reporting or not reporting these injuries. The results of our study demonstrated that 19.33% of the total participants were exposed to NSIs at work, which was much lower than in other studies,12,18-21 but was slightly higher than in a study performed in the Awi Zone.9 Prior studies showed that insulin syringe needle was the second most frequent cause of NSIs.12

  • Seroconversion rates among health care workers exposed to hepatitis C virus–contaminated body fluids: The University of Pittsburgh 13-year experience

    2017, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    The seroconversion rate reported by the CDC is 1.8% (range, 0%-7%),3 but relies on an average rate calculated from only a few studies conducted in the 1990s, which are small, do not consider mucocutaneous exposures, and two-thirds of which are not based in the United States. More studies have been published since, and the seroconversion rate ranges from 0% to 5.4%.12,14-18,20-22 Our study found an overall seroconversion rate of 0.1% (n = 2) after occupational exposure to the blood of HCV-positive source patients.

  • Effect of modifying the information and training structure on the occupational safety of health care workers in exposure to blood and body fluids: A quasi-experimental study

    2017, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    It seems that the training should be done outside of these times, which can indicate the necessity to revise the manner of holding and teaching in-person training classes. Therefore, lack of sufficient attention to its nature and participation in class just to meet the task and get administrative privileges can be the main cause of noneffectiveness of these classes, which is confirmed by the study of Sabermoghaddam et al.10 Therefore, in this study, the necessary information on standard precautions along with its main principles was made available using a Web-based information system. One of the limitations of the present study was the time limitation for investigating before and after the intervention, this was because of the impossibility of controlling other programs related to infection prevention and control in both the intervention and control hospitals for a longer time period.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflicts of interest: None to report.

View full text