Elsevier

Agricultural Water Management

Volume 194, December 2017, Pages 100-112
Agricultural Water Management

Review
Food and water security: Analysis of integrated modeling platforms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Interdisciplinary research is required to achieve global food and water security while ensuring environmental sustainability.

  • Ten models that assess food and water security from an interdisciplinary perspective are critically analyzed.

  • Various hydrologic, environmental and socio-economic drivers are identified that greatly influence food and water security.

  • Model uncertainties including data scarcity, spatial resolution, and climate parameters reduce confidence in model results.

  • Food and water security models need to consider all anthropogenic disturbances and attempt to reduce model uncertainties.

Abstract

Food and water security are directly linked through the agricultural sector and food production and processing. Increasing stresses on food and water resources, influenced by factors such as population growth and climate change, threaten global food and water security. Previous studies have attempted to address this issue with the development of various modeling frameworks, often combining food security and water security models to address the inter-relationship between the two concepts. This study first introduces some of the background and foundational principles behind food and water security models, then critically reviews models that jointly analyze the two concepts. Initially, the dynamic definitions and historic development of water and food security concepts are reviewed. Current global hydrological models and food production/consumption models are then discussed to provide requisite background on available modeling platforms that separately assess water and food security. This study then focuses on an evaluation of ten models that assess food and water security from an interdisciplinary perspective, providing in-depth analysis regarding input parameters, model processes, advantages and limitations. Results suggest that there is a need to further develop input datasets as well as spatial and temporal resolution in existing food and water security models. This will provide the foundation for the development of effective policies and strategies to mitigate future food and water security issues, while considering the protection of the natural environment.

Introduction

Globally, both food and water resources are under significant pressure to meet the needs of a growing population. Millions of people worldwide face considerable threats to their food and water security, and the impacts of these issues will only be intensified with future effects of global climate change and changes to land-use. It has thus become apparent in recent years that the connections between food and water supply must be explored in order to work toward a state of global food and water security.

Water supply and availability directly affect food production through agricultural practices. Sufficient water supply is vital to ensure crop growth and livestock survival, and agriculture accounts for approximately 70% of global freshwater use (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2014). Conversely, improper management practices in the agricultural sector can result in runoff and contamination by excess nutrients or chemicals entering into the water supply. As a consequence, neither food or water security can realistically be achieved on a global scale without the other. It is therefore important to consider food and water security from an interdisciplinary perspective in the pursuit of global security. In order to work toward global food and water security, it is first necessary to have an understanding of how global food and water systems operate, how they are affected by various drivers, and how they will be expected to change in the future. Modeling platforms allow researchers to simulate and understand current systems, identify key drivers and their potential impact, and make specific parameter alterations to predict future scenarios. They also provide the basis for critical thought necessary to design and simulate solutions for system improvement.

Previous research has led to the development of a number of modeling platforms to jointly analyze food and water security (Alcamo et al., 2001, Amarasinghe, 2005, Blanco et al., 2012, Bondeau et al., 2007, de Fraiture, 2007, Grafton et al., 2015, Liu et al., 2007, Rosegrant et al., 2008, Siebert and Döll, 2008, Wei et al., 2009). These models have been developed for a variety of circumstances and conditions, and have vast differences in their operation and overall purpose. This review and analysis is intended to provide a basis for research studies concerned with the application or adaptation of interdisciplinary food and water security models. A fundamental understanding of the depth of potential modeling platforms, and their various capabilities and uses, is required prior to selecting the appropriate tool for a particular application. This manuscript attempts to identify key drivers of food and water security models, and offers a basis for comparison of several of the models according to these key drivers, input requirements, model limitations and advantages.

This manuscript initially discusses the fundamental concepts of food and water security to provide the broader context and requisite background on these topics. In doing so, the manuscript summarizes current hydrological and food production and consumption modeling structures that have been applied independently for either water or food security analyses. This information serves as a foundation for research and provides insight into more detailed and complex interdisciplinary models. The paper then focuses on ten food and water security models to critically review and analyze their application, processes, input data and information, advantages and limitations. Results from this analysis will provide guidance for model selection and development to improve understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of food and water security.

Section snippets

Overview of water security

Globally, fresh water may be our most precious resource; however, threats to global water security continue to impact the health of our fresh water resources. The global water cycle is being significantly altered by land development and the resulting effects to runoff, evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge processes. In urban and other developing areas, population growth decreases the availability of fresh water while urbanization decreases recharge to groundwater and increases stormwater

Overview of food security

Food insecurity represents one of the most significant challenges for the global population. Each year, more people die from malnutrition than from AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined (World Food Programme, 2016). Food insecurity can also lead to civil unrest and violence, justifying the need for government assistance and investment in agriculture in order to reduce conflict and build social capital (Notaras, 2011). Population growth, urbanization, and climate change are just a few of the

Food and water security models

The interdependence between water and food security emphasizes the importance of studying these variables in an inter-connected manner. Recently, there have been substantial advances in the creation of modeling frameworks that address food and water collectively. A comprehensive review of the literature reveals ten existing models that jointly analyze food and water security, in order to characterize and evaluate the interactions between the two concepts. A brief review of the primary focus of

Discussion

The ten food and water security models reviewed in the past section were all created under different circumstances in order to serve a variety of purposes. While some of the platforms are suitable for global analyses of food and water security, others require more detailed input data and have been validated at regional or river basin scaled analyses (see Table 1). Several models place more focus on either food or water security indicators in terms of their model output.

Before using one of these

Concluding remarks

As global food and water security persist and intensify, the study of their connection and relationship to one another is becoming increasingly imperative. There remains considerable uncertainty with regard to the ability of predictive tools to assess the state of future global food and water situations. Modeling platforms to jointly analyze food and water systems exist; however, further developments and adaptations are still required in order to improve modeling capabilities and provide

References (78)

  • R.L. McCown et al.

    APSIM: an agricultural production system simulation model for operational research

    Math. Comput. Simul.

    (1995)
  • R.L. McCown et al.

    APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research

    Agric. Syst.

    (1996)
  • S. Siebert et al.

    Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation

    J. Hydrol.

    (2010)
  • M. Van Dijk et al.

    A review of global food security scenario and assessment studies: results: gaps and research priorities

    Glob. Food Sec.

    (2014)
  • X. Wei et al.

    Future cereal production in China: the interaction of climate change, water availability and socio-economic scenarios

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2009)
  • J. Alcamo et al.

    Global Change and Global Scenarios of Water Use and Availability: An Application of WaterGAP 1.0, Center for Environmental Systems Research

    (1997)
  • J. Alcamo et al.

    Global modelling of environmental change: an overview of IMAGE 2.1. Glob. Chang. Scenar. 21 st century

    Resul. IMAGE

    (1998)
  • R.G. Allen et al.
    (1998)
  • U. Amarasinghe

    PODIUMSIM: CPSP Report 10 Country Policy Support Programme New Delhi

    (2005)
  • J.G. Arnold et al.

    SWAT: Soil and Water Assessment Tool

    (1994)
  • W. Baier et al.

    Estimation of latent evaporation from simple weather observations

    Can. J. plant Sci.

    (1965)
  • M.F.P. Bierkens

    Global hydrology 2015 State, trends, and directions

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2015)
  • M. Blanco et al.
  • A. Bondeau et al.

    Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance

    Glob. Chang. Biol.

    (2007)
  • P. Döll et al.
  • C. De Fraiture et al.

    Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy

    Water Policy

    (2008)
  • FAO

    Report on the Agro-ecological Zones Project, FAO World Soil Resources Report, 48/1, 4

    (1978)
  • D. Gerten et al.

    Global water availability and requirements for future food production

    J. Hydrometeorol.

    (2011)
  • I. Giuntoli et al.

    Future hydrological extremes: the uncertainty from multiple global climate and global hydrological models

    Earth Syst. Dyn.

    (2015)
  • R.Q. Grafton et al.

    Food and water gaps to 2050: preliminary results from the global food and water system (GFWS) platform

    Food Secur.

    (2015)
  • G.H. Hargreaves et al.

    Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature

    Appl. Eng. Agric.

    (1985)
  • L. Jansky et al.

    International Water Security: Domestic Threats and Opportunities

    (2008)
  • R.G. Jones et al.

    Generating High Resolution Climate Change Scenarios Using PRECIS

    (2004)
  • V. Krysanova et al.

    SWIM (soil and Water Integrated Model): User Manual

    (2000)
  • V. Krysanova et al.

    Development of the ecohydrological model SWIM for regional impact studies and vulnerability assessment

    Hydrol. Process.

    (2005)
  • H. Li et al.

    Evolution of property rights in groundwater irrigation system and food-water security in Haihe basin, China

    IAHS Publ. Proc. Reports

    (2007)
  • J. Liu et al.

    A global and spatially explicit assessment of climate change impacts on crop production and consumptive water use

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • J. Lundqvist et al.
  • D.C. McKinney et al.

    Modeling Water Resources Management at the Basin Level: Review and Future Directions

    (1999)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Development and validation of management assessment tools considering water, food, and energy security nexus at the farm level

      2022, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
      Citation Excerpt :

      The highest frequency of each section focuses the number of researchers who have used these components. The accessibility component in water security measurement has been mentioned the most, and these results are consistent with those of Purwanto and Suryadi (2019) and McNeill et al. (2017). The highest frequency in measuring food safety is related to food availability, consistent with Broeck et al. (2018) and Levy et al. (2017).

    • Advancing the application of a model-independent open-source geospatial tool for national-scale spatiotemporal simulations

      2019, Environmental Modelling and Software
      Citation Excerpt :

      To date, no study has demonstrated GeoSim for broader spatial scales, although it can potentially be applied as such. There is a growing demand for large-scale and high-resolution modelling of crop yields and water consumption, as the concerns for food and water security continue to increase under global change (McNeill et al., 2017). To demonstrate GeoSim's applicability to satisfy such demand, this study used GeoSim to implement the widely-applied FAO AquaCrop model for simulating wheat yield and irrigation water requirements across China from 2000 to 2009.

    • Simulating the influence of integrated crop-livestock systems on water yield at watershed scale

      2019, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      To feed this population, research has suggested that agriculture must double yields (Tilman et al., 2002, 2011; Tilman and Clark, 2015). The increased agricultural yields may be an achievable task through the intensification and expansion of farming accompanied by sufficient water supply to ensure improved crop growth and livestock survival (McNeill et al., 2017). This inextricable link between food production and water resources is vital to the subsistence of humankind.

    • Integrated modeling framework for evaluating and predicting the water resources carrying capacity in a continental river basin of Northwest China

      2018, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      SWAT is a physically based, computationally efficient, and a continuous time model that presents accurate runoff simulations, uses readily available inputs and enables users to study long-term impacts (Neitsch et al., 2011). However, few studies have focused on the dynamic combination of the SWAT model and the water resources carrying capacity model in the evaluation and prediction of water resource evolution (Mcneill et al., 2017). Moreover, the evaluation and prediction of water resources carrying capacity have seldom been coupled with the Principal Component Analysis and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (Hong et al., 2016; Ren et al., 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text