Evaluation of the water cost effect on water resource management:: Application to typical crops in a semiarid region

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2003.10.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The greatest water consumption takes place during irrigation of arid and semiarid areas, therefore, water resource management is fundamental for sustainability. For correct management, several tools and decision-making systems are necessary while paying close attention to aspects such as profitability, water cost, etc. Water resources are scarce and some of them are of low quality. This extremely delicate situation occurs in some regions of the world and it explains increasing water cost. In Europe, the policies relating to water use (2000/60/EC) pay particular attention to the need of its protection and conservation. To ensure this, a large number of measures, including the establishment of prices which really correspond to their usage costs, have been set forth. Water subsidies are relatively important in all European countries. In this study, a specific methodology is applied to a Spanish semi-arid region. It is useful and easy to apply, not only by farmers, but also by water managers and politicians in charge of policy. The methodology also helps in the decision-making process about water cost in agriculture. In this area (Hydrogeological System 08.29, Spain), the resources are mainly underground water with a high variable cost and without any direct subsidies. This model allows us to analyse the effect of different water costs and to find the optimum strategy giving the maximum gross margin in line with water cost and its main determining factors (irrigation system, climatic variability, etc.).

The methodology is based on the effect of irrigation on crop yield with its production function, integrating the effect of application efficiency. In this way, a relationship between gross margin and gross irrigation depth is obtained. Working with permanent irrigation systems and four crops (barley, garlic, maize and onion), the main conclusion is that the optimum gross irrigation depths are always fewer than those necessary for maximum crop yield and when irrigation depths are fewer water cost increases. Irrigation depths, which maximise the economic efficiency in the use of water (€ m−3), are fewer than those which maximise the gross margin; therefore, this aspect must be considered in irrigation scheduling. The results also show important differences among crops, depending on their water requirements and their economic profitability.

Introduction

The area under irrigation in the world is very large and is continuously growing. From 1975 to 1995, it has increased 72%. In Europe, irrigated land has doubled in this period and in Spain, the European country with the largest irrigated area, irrigation already exceeds 3,500,000 ha (FAO, 2002). Irrigation is a decisive factor in vast areas of our planet, among which, a large part of the European Mediterranean basin is included.

As Framework Directive 2000/60/EC states, water is not a product, property, or goods of any kind, it is a heritage that must be protected and defended. The use of this scarce and essential resource is of great importance from many points of view: environmental, social, economic and political.

The debate over the price of water is complex, considering that it is a natural environmental resource. It is generally accepted that a great many factors (environmental, landscape, social, cultural, etc.) influence the economic valuation of water so the concept of application cost emerges in the case of irrigation water use (Haruvy and Sadan, 1994, Ortega, 2000, Garrido, 2001, Barraquee, 2001).

Charging a rate has become one form of action due to the agricultural demand of water (Directive 2000/60/EC). It is getting more usual to use progressive tariffs, in which the pricing is based on several prices (COM, 2000). There is an initial price, relatively low, which corresponds to a consumption considered rational; other prices, much higher, correspond to consumptions over and above the limits, which represent an unsuitable use of water.

Corominas (1996) points out that the current cost of water in irrigated public Spanish lands is about 0.12  m−3, including regulation, transport and distribution to the farmer’s plot, with public subsidies of approximately 90%. The cost of water for city use is more than twice the former, with a 25% subsidy. This situation is representative of most irrigated European farms. This concept must take into account the idea of balancing the cost of water to the price of water, which should be analysed with special attention when using water for irrigation (Garrido, 1998). We must not forget either, that currently, in most cases, government subsidies for irrigation water are not related to crop productivity, employment created, farm size, farmer’s income and water management (Varela et al., 1998, Calatrava and Garrido, 2001).

In general, the actual costs of water available for use varies within the following ranges (Castillo, 1997):

  • ground water: 0.12–0.18  m−3,

  • diverted water: 0.15–0.24  m−3,

  • desalted water: sea 0.84–1.14  m−3; brackish water 0.09–0.18  m−3,

  • reused water: 0.15–0.18  m−3.

The efficient use of water resources will be a fundamental target for farmers and water management. There is an urgent need of methodologies that allow us to analyse, as precisely as possible, the effect of the price of water on the agricultural production process. The analysis must focus, mainly, on irrigation strategies to maximise gross margins and profits, taking into account the limits and restrictions imposed by the sustainability of the production system. The price of water is obviously not the only factor taken into account in this process. There are other factors to be considered, e.g. distribution uniformity, application efficiency, and irrigation scheduling.

The aim of the study is to provide simple methodology for analysing the effect of the cost of water on the crops in semiarid regions. This is done by economically evaluating the best strategies and their implications. Moreover, the results of their application to a specific territory in a semiarid region with scarce water resources (Castilla-La Mancha) are examined and discussed for four important crops, as well as the implications for Europe in general. These crops are: barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), maize (Zea mays L.) and onion (Allium cepa L.).

Section snippets

Methodology

The main aspects are considered: (1) analysis model, including application efficiency (Ea) due to irrigation uniformity, drift and evaporation losses (ASAE, 2001), and crop yield response to irrigation; (2) the process to estimate the cost of irrigation water application in the case of groundwater as well as the required production costs; and (3) a brief description of the territory where the model will be applied.

Results and discussion

The main results can be grouped into three blocks: (1) net seasonal requirements, (2) optimum gross irrigation depth and their evolution throughout the year, and (3) irrigation depths that allow us to obtain the maximum economic efficiency (EE).

Conclusions

The main conclusions focus on the following:

  • Strategies for the use of the available irrigation water, which will lead to optimisation, directly contributing to its sustainability and considering the following gross irrigation depths:

    • Depth for maximum agricultural yield (ETa=ETm), according to classical irrigation scheduling.

    • Maximum gross margin depth, defined in this study as the economically optimum depth. This depth takes into account deficit irrigation strategies and it is much lower than

References (30)

  • H. Castillo

    La importancia de las disponibilidades de agua para regadı́o en diferentes áreas de cultivo

    Riegos y Drenajes XXI

    (1997)
  • COM (Commission of the European Communities), 2000. Pricing policies for enhancing the sustainability of water...
  • J. Corominas

    El regadı́o en el umbral del siglo XXI: Plan Nacional de Regadı́os

    Riegos y Drenajes XXI

    (1996)
  • De Juan, J.A., Ortega, J.F., Tarjuelo, J.M., 2003. Sistemas de cultivo. Evaluación de itinerarios técnicos....
  • Doorenbos, J., Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. FAO, Rome,...
  • Cited by (39)

    • Utilization of chemical wastewater for CO<inf>2</inf> emission reduction: Purified terephthalic acid (PTA) wastewater-mediated culture of microalgae for CO<inf>2</inf> bio-capture

      2020, Applied Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, we have provided a trinity model (three objectives in one system) to achieve water saving, CO2 emission reduction and energy regeneration in an integrated strategy. Advantage analysis in cost decreasing and profit marking of our approach is present in Table 3 [25–28,59,60]. First, microalgae have been considered as one of promising species for CO2 sequestration.

    • Combining GIS and FAO's crop water productivity model for the estimation of water footprinting in a temporary river catchment

      2019, Sustainable Production and Consumption
      Citation Excerpt :

      As Brown and Matlock (2011) reported, cereal imports could compensate for these shortcomings. In the arid and semi-arid areas such as those in southern Europe, the correct management of water is of fundamental importance as well as the evaluation of water consumption associated mainly with agricultural activity (Sabziparvar and Tabari, 2010; Lopez and Vurro, 2008; Ortega et al., 2004). The estimation of global, national and local (at river basin or municipality scale) water consumption can be performed using the Water Footprint (WF) (Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2003).

    • A fuzzy inexact two-phase programming approach to solving optimal allocation problems in water resources management

      2014, Applied Mathematical Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previously, a number of regional models were proposed for integrated management of water resources. For example, Ortega et al. [5] provided a simple methodology for analyzing the effect of water-utilization cost on the crops in a Spanish semi-arid region. Fassio et al. [6] developed a decision support system for assessing alternative measures for the reduction of nitrogen pressure from agriculture on water resources at a European level.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text