ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Addictive Behaviors
Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2006, Pages 264-277
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (141 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.002    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior

Scott T. Waltersa, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Jo Anne Wrightb and Ross Shegogc

aUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, V8.112, Dallas, TX 75390-9128, United States bUniversity of Michigan, United States cCenter for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Texas Medical Center, Houston, United States

Available online 13 June 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This article reviews studies of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior, published between 1995 and August 2004. Following electronic and manual searches of the literature, 19 studies were identified that used automated systems for smoking prevention or cessation, and measured outcomes related to smoking behavior. Studies varied widely in methodology, intervention delivery, participant characteristics, follow-up period, and measurement of cessation. Of eligible studies, nine (47%) reported statistically significant or improved outcomes at the longest follow-up, relative to a comparison group. Few patterns emerged in terms of subject, design or intervention characteristics that led to positive outcomes. The “first generation” format, where participants were mailed computer-generated feedback reports, was the modal intervention format and the one most consistently associated with improved outcomes. Future studies will need to identify whether certain patients are more likely to benefit from such interventions, and which pharmacological and behavioral adjuncts can best promote cessation.

Keywords: Smoking; Cessation; Computer; Internet; Intervention

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Rationale for the present review
3. Methods
3.1. Search strategy
3.2. Inclusion criteria
3.3. Data synthesis
4. Results
4.1. Adolescent studies
4.2. Adult studies
5. Discussion
References

Addictive Behaviors
Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2006, Pages 264-277
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.