ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2008, Pages 220-230
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (271 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.

A Typology of Librarian Status at Land Grant Universities

Mary K. Bolina, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Professor and Chair

aTechnical Services, University Libraries, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-4100, USA

Available online 10 April 2008.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Data were gathered on librarian status at fifty land grant universities. The findings reveal four status types: Professorial, Other ranks with tenure, Other ranks without tenure, and Academic or Professional Staff. Eighty percent of institutions have librarians who are faculty and 85 percent of those are tenure-track.

Article Outline

Introduction
Purpose of the Study
Literature Review
Methodology
Research Design
Procedures for Data Analysis
Results
Librarian Status Typology
Frequencies
Administrator Title
Rank System
Tenure Eligibility
Faculty Senate Representation
Cross Tabulations
Employee Group—Administrator Title
Employee Group—Rank System
Employee Group—Tenure Eligibility
Employee Group—Faculty Senate Representation
Administrator Title—Rank System
Administrator Title—Tenure Eligibility
Administrator Title—Faculty Senate Representation
Rank System—Tenure Eligibility
Rank System—Faculty Senate Representation
Tenure Eligibility—Faculty Senate Representation
Conclusions, Recommendations, and Suggestions for Future Research
Appendix A. Typology Data
References


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.