Elsevier

Analytical Biochemistry

Volume 532, 1 September 2017, Pages 64-71
Analytical Biochemistry

Electrochemical label-free and sensitive nanobiosensing of DNA hybridization by graphene oxide modified pencil graphite electrode

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2017.06.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Based on the strong interaction between single-stranded DNA (ss-DNA) and graphene material, we have constructed a novel label-free electrochemical biosensor for rapid and facile detection of short sequences ss-DNA molecules related to hepatitis C virus 1a using graphene oxide modified pencil graphite electrode. The sensing mechanism is based on the superior adsorption of single-stranded DNA to GO over double stranded DNA (ds-DNA). The intrinsic guanine oxidation signal measured by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) has been used for duplex DNA formation detection. The probe ss-DNA adsorbs onto the surface of GO via the π– π* stacking interactions leading to a strong background guanine oxidation signal. In the presence of complementary target, formation of helix which has weak binding ability to GO induced ds-DNA to release from the electrode surface and significant variation in differential pulse voltammetric response of guanine bases. The results indicated that the oxidation peak current was proportional to the concentration of complementary strand in the range of 0.1 nM–0.5 μM with a detection limit of 4.3 × 10−11 M. The simple fabricated electrochemical biosensor has high sensitivity, good selectivity, and could be applied as a new platform for a range of target molecules in future.

Introduction

In recent years, sensitive, effective and rapid detection of specific biomolecules have attracted much attention due to their potential roles in medical diagnosis, genetic screening, biological engineering, food quality analysis and environmental protection. DNA sequence detections have various applications such as detection of target genes, discrimination and classification of various organisms and also detection of genetic based disorders. Various DNA biosensors have been developed including fluorescence techniques [1], [2], surface plasma resonance spectroscopy [3], [4], [5], [6], quartz-crystal microbalance [7], [8], electrochemiluminescence [9], electrochemical [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] and so on. Electrochemical detection has attracted a great deal of attention in the development of biosensors because of low background, simplicity operation, fast response time, high sensitivity, miniaturization, cost effectiveness, and etc. New kind of carbon materials carbon nanotube (CNT), graphene (GN) and graphene oxide GO based DNA sensors have attracted considerable attention in recent years due to a number of the outstanding electronic, thermal and mechanical properties and good chemical stability [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].

Various electrochemical DNA biosensors based on graphene or its derivatives have been developed [19], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Although these approaches have high sensitivity, hybridization indicators or labeled DNA probes are usually needed. Most convenient electrical readout technique is electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) by using electrochemical redox indicator like [Ru(phen)3]2+, [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-, which has been shown to be well suited for hybridization detection [28], [29], [30], [31]. To overcome probe labeling or indicator usage, increasing researches have been made to develop label-free electrochemical DNA biosensor. Signal transduction induced directly from oxidation of guanine or adenine moieties in DNA strands (label-free detection) makes the principle of DNA hybridization detection in direct strategy and seems to be a simple, less time consuming and more applicable strategy in comparison with the others.

The GN modified carbon electrodes were used for the sensitive determination of hybridization based on guanine oxidation signal [32]. Their strategy is similar to unmodified electrodes and both ss-DNA and ds-DNA adsorb on the GN modified electrode surface. Researches showed that GN and GO has superior binding to ss-DNA over rigid ds-DNA and has been used for the fabrication of biosensors for detecting nucleic acids [30], [33], [34], proteins [35], [36], and small molecules [37], [38], [39]. Recently, we developed an electrochemical aptasensor for the determination of thrombin based on decrease of guanine oxidation signal after interaction between nucleotides and thrombin [40].

In this work, we have proposed a platform for the fabrication of electrochemical biosensors by using GO as electrode modifier and short sequence oligonucleotides related to hepatitis C virus selected as model oligonucleotides. Unlike the graphene, oxidized form of graphene, GO, has negative surface charge which result in desorption of probe DNA from electrode surface after hybridization with its target DNA. As shown in Scheme 1, the probe ss-DNA can be easily immobilized on the surface of GO/PGE due to the π-π* hydrophobic physical adsorption and van der Waals attraction between the purine/pyrimidine ring structure in the nucleobases and the hexagonal cells of GO and target molecules will alter the structure of probe ss-DNA and leads to desorption of formed duplex from the surface of GO and decreasing of guanine oxidation signal. Consequently, electrochemical response obtained at the electrode will be changed, thus the target can be detected. By this approach, more practical biosensor was obtained because of the simple electrode preparation and further signal change due to the ds-DNA desorption from electrode surface. Besides, there is no need for inosine substituted probe as used in previous work. This strategy was demonstrated as a convenient, sensitive and selective detection platform for a range of target analytes.

Section snippets

Materials

The pencil graphite was obtained as pencil lead from Rotring Co. LTD, Germany (R 505210 N) of type H. All leads had a diameter of 2.0 mm and were used as received. Oligonucleotides were purchased as lyophilized powder from MWG-Biotech Company. The sequence of probe DNA (PHCV1a) is 5′-TAATGAGGGCTGCGGGTGGG-3′. The sequence of complementary DNA (HCV1a) is 5′-CCCACCCGCAGCCCTCATTA-3′. The sequences of non-complementary DNAs are as 5′-GTGGGTGATATGTGTGG-3′; 5′-TCCACCGCTTCTTGTCCTGCT-3′ and

Preliminary investigation

The morphology of the PGE and Go/PGE was characterized using SEM (Fig. 1A and B) and results represent that the prepared graphene oxide shows the flake-like shape and layer–layer structure of graphene oxide edges.

In order to check whether our proposal can work or not, a series of experiments were carried out. Firstly, we have examined whether the ss-DNA or ds-DNA can be immobilized onto the GO modified electrode by using guanine oxidation signal. For this purpose, we used PHCV1a, HCV1a and

Conclusion

A simple and sensitive label-free electrochemical DNA biosensor for the determination of HCV1a gene was developed by employing graphene oxide modified pencil graphite electrode. Under optimized conditions, the decrease of guanine oxidation signal is linearly related to the target oligonucleotide concentration with a detection limit of 4.3 × 10 -11 M. Compared with the existing methods for DNA detection, the strategy eliminated the requirement for DNA labeling, representing a comparatively

References (50)

  • A. Benvidi et al.

    Comparison of impedimetric detection of DNA hybridization on the various biosensors based on modified glassy carbon electrodes with PANHS and nanomaterials of RGO and MWCNTs

    Talanta

    (2016)
  • Y.Z. Zhang et al.

    Decorating graphene sheets with gold nanoparticles for the detection of sequence-specific DNA

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2012)
  • L.M. Zhu et al.

    DNA electrochemical biosensor based on thionine-graphene nanocomposite

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2012)
  • B. Li et al.

    Sensitive HIV-1 detection in a homogeneous solution based on an electrochemical molecular beacon coupled with a nafion–graphene composite film modified screen-printed carbon electrode

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2014)
  • B. Li et al.

    Graphene electrode modified with electrochemically reduced graphene oxide for label-free DNA detection

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2015)
  • H. Huang et al.

    An ultrasensitive electrochemical DNA biosensor based on graphene/Au nanorod/polythionine for human papillomavirus DNA detection

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2015)
  • Y. Hu et al.

    Green-synthesized gold nanoparticles decorated graphene sheets for label-free electrochemical impedance DNA hybridization biosensing

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2011)
  • F. Jiao et al.

    A novel and label-free biosensors for uracil-DNA glycosylase activity based on the electrochemical oxidation of guanine bases at the graphene modified electrode

    Talanta

    (2016)
  • Y.L. Yuan et al.

    Dendrimer functionalized reduced graphene oxide as nanocarrier for sensitive pseudobienzyme electrochemical aptasensor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2013)
  • Y. He et al.

    Low background signal platform for the detection of ATP: when a molecular aptamer beacon meets graphene oxide

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2011)
  • F. Ahour et al.

    An electrochemical label-free and sensitive thrombin aptasensor based on graphene oxide modified pencil graphite electrode

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2016)
  • Y. Dharmadi et al.

    DNA microarrays: experimental issues, data analysis, and application to bacterial systems

    Biotechnol. Prog.

    (2004)
  • J.N. Murphy et al.

    On the nature of DNA self-assembled monolayers on Au: measuring surface heterogeneity with electrochemical in situ fluorescence microscopy

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2009)
  • F. Patolsky et al.

    Amplified microgravimetric quartzcrystal-microbalance assay of DNA using oligonucleotide-functionalized liposomes or biotinylated liposomes

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2000)
  • M.S. Hejazi et al.

    Electrochemical detection of short sequences of hepatitis C 3a virus using a peptide nucleic acid-assembled gold electrode

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text