doi:10.1016/j.ab.2004.09.044
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction-based exponential sample amplification for microarray gene expression profiling
Zsolt B. Nagya, János Z. Kelemena, Liliána Z. Fehéra, Ágnes Zvaraa, Kata Juhászb and László G. Puskása,
, 
aLaboratory of Functional Genomics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 521, Szeged H-6701, Hungary
bInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 521, Szeged H-6701, Hungary
Received 2 August 2004.
Available online 15 December 2004.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
Conventional approaches to target labeling for gene expression analysis using microarray technology typically require relatively large amounts of RNA, a serious limitation when the available sample is limited. Here we describe an alternative exponential sample amplification method by using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) to follow the amplification and eliminate the overamplified cDNA which could distort the quantitative ratio of the starting mRNA population. Probes generated from nonamplified, PCR-amplified, and real-time-PCR-amplified cDNA samples were generated from lipopolysaccharide-treated and nontreated mouse macrophages and hybridized to mouse cDNA microarrays. Signals obtained from the three protocols were compared. Reproducibility and reliability of the methods were determined. The Pearson correlation coefficients for replica experiments were r = 0.927 and r = 0.687 for QRT-PCR-amplification and PCR-overamplification protocols, respectively. χ2 test showed that overamplification resulted in major biases in expression ratios, while these alterations could be eliminated by following the cycling status with QRT-PCR. Our exponential sample amplification protocol preserves the original expression ratios and allows unbiased gene expression analysis from minute amounts of starting material.
Keywords: Exponential sample amplification; Quantitative real-time PCR; Microarray; Gene expression profiling
Fig. 1. cDNA amplification with QRT-PCR. (A) QRT-PCR diagram of the LPS-treated mouse macrophage. With the QRT-PCR halted at the 14th cycle, the amplified cDNA (a2) was generated in the exponential phase of the reaction; the overamplified cDNA (a1) was isolated from reactions halted at the 21st cycle; a3 denotes the nontemplate control. (B) Electrophoretic assessment of cDNA-amplification-based QRT-PCR from LPS-treated mouse macrophage. Lanes 2 and 3 contained amplified cDNAs obtained from the exponential phase; lanes 4–6 were loaded with overamplified samples; lane 1 is a 100-bp DNA ladder (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea).
Fig. 2. Scatter plot of gene expression ratios after LPS treatment obtained with three different protocols. Only those values which were above +1 and below −1 obtained by the nonamplification protocol were selected. Gene expression ratios corresponding to these spot labels gathered from exponential and overamplified sample amplification protocols are also shown.
Table 1.
Primers used in QRT-PCR

Table 2.
Selected genes with altered expression in response to LPS treatment in mouse macrophages compared to non-treated cells

Light gray: different Log ratio in the nonamplified sample compared to the exponentially amplified cDNA sample; dark gray: similar Log ratio in the nonamplified and exponentially amplified samples but different with the overamplified sample.
* Values above and below +1 and −1, respectively, however, with nonsignificant changes.
Table 3.
Confirmation of expression ratios obtained by different protocols with RT-QPCR analysis

χ2 test: p = 0.8807 (nonamplified template compared to exponentially amplified template), p = 0.0291 (exponentially amplified template compared to over-amplified template) and p = 0.0426 (nonamplified template compared to over-amplified template). One-sampled Student’s t test (t value, p value; α = 0.05). Light gray: different expression ratio from exponentially amplified cDNA in comparison to expression ratio from the non-amplified cDNA; Dark gray: different expression ratio from over-amplified cDNA in comparison to expression ratio from non-amplified cDNA.