Modeling correlation and heterogeneity in crash rates by collision types using full bayesian random parameters multivariate Tobit model
Introduction
Freeway diverge areas play an important role in diverging the exiting traffic from the through traffic on freeway mainline. However, they have been considered to be crash-prone locations due to the disturbances caused by the intense lane changes at diverge areas (Chen et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Li et al., 2015). These disturbances may result in many traffic conflicts, leading to high potential of traffic crashes. An efficient way to improve the safety of freeway diverge areas is to understand the risk factors affecting crashes at freeway diverge areas. As such, analytical tools need to be developed that can aid transportation safety professionals in mitigation of crashes. Previous studies have developed several safety performance functions (SPFs) to evaluate the safety performance of freeway exit ramp areas (Bauer and Harwood, 1998; McCartt et al., 2004; Lord and Bonneson, 2005; Moon and Hummer, 2009; Chen et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2014). Though it is expected that the impact of risk factors on different collision types are different, previous studies did not distinguish the collision types during the modeling analyses of crash rates. This study aims to add to the current literature by proposing a methodological approach that takes into account crash rates by collision types at freeway diverge areas. Moreover, this paper seeks to shed light on possible risk factors related to crash rates of different collision types at freeway diverge areas.
Crash rates analysis is now advocated as an alternative of crash frequency prediction models because of several advantages. Crash rates provide a standardized safety measure of road entities, which is more understandable and acceptable to the public. Moreover, crash rates are commonly used in the accident reporting systems (NHTSA, 2012). As such, the development of crash rates model has many potential applications and benefits. For example, the crash rate models were considered to be a complementary tool for road safety diagnosis in hotspots identification (Ma et al., 2015a; Xu et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2018). The traffic safety evaluations in before-after studies could be enhanced by combining crash count models and crash rates models.
Different from the features of discrete and non-negative for crash frequency, crash rates are continuous data that is usually left-censored at zero because no crashes may be reported over a specified time period. To deal with the censoring problem, the Tobit model was proposed to model crash rates by previous study (Anastasopoulos et al., 2008). The model has attracted considerable interest in recent traffic safety studies (Anastasopoulos et al., 2012a; Xu et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2015b; Yu et al., 2015; Caliendo et al., 2016; Bin Islam and Hernandez, 2016; Anastasopoulos, 2016; Zeng et al., 2017a, b; Anderson and Hernandez, 2017; Sarwar and Anastasopoulos, 2017; Zeng et al., 2018).
Crashes present different collision types due to the particular geometric and traffic features at various freeway diverge areas. Compared with analysis of total crash rates at freeway diverge area, modeling crash rates by collision types can provide better understanding of the impact of risk factors on the crash rates with a particular collision type. However, if crash rates are modeled independently irrespective of correlations among crash rates across collision types, significant estimation error could be introduced because unobserved effects at freeway diverge areas are likely to be shared among different types of collisions (Anastasopoulos et al., 2012a; Anastasopoulos, 2016; Zeng et al., 2017a; Sarwar and Anastasopoulos, 2017; Zeng et al., 2018). Meanwhile, the effect of risk factors on crash rates may vary across observations. If such unobserved heterogeneous effect is ignored, the model fit will be reduced and may result in biased parameter estimation and erroneous inferences (Anastasopoulos et al., 2012b; Chen et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2015; Caliendo et al., 2016; Bin Islam and Hernandez, 2016; Zeng et al., 2017b).
The objective of this study is to simultaneously analyze crash rates by collision types at freeway diverge areas via developing a random parameters multivariate Tobit (RPMV-Tobit) model, which accommodates both correlation between crash rates across collision types and unobserved heterogeneity across observations. Three-year period (2004–2006) crash data, including three types of collisions (i.e., rear-end, sideswipe, and angle), from 367 freeway diverge areas are used for the analysis. Four types of freeway diverge areas are identified according to the arrangement of lanes for traffic to exit. Three candidate Tobit models, i.e. multivariate Tobit (MV-Tobit) model, random effect Tobit (REMV-Tobit) model, and independent univariate Tobit (IU-Tobit) model were also estimated and compared with the RPMV-Tobit model under the Bayesian framework.
Section snippets
Safety analysis of freeway diverge areas
Previously, numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety performance of freeway diverge areas using the SPFs such as Poisson and negative binomial (NB) model, Poisson-lognormal model, zero-inflated count model, negative multinomial model, and generalized estimating equation model (Bauer and Harwood, 1998; Bared et al., 1999; McCartt et al., 2004; Golob et al., 2004; Lord and Bonneson, 2005; Garcia and Romero, 2006; Moon and Hummer, 2009; Chen et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Lu et
Data
Crash data for a three-year period were collected from 367 freeway diverge areas in the State of Florida, United States. Risk factors including the road geometries and traffic exposures were collected as explanatory variables (See Table 1). The diverge area defined in this paper covers a deceleration lane and an exit. More specifically, the diverge contains two influence areas, including an area located within 1500 ft upstream of the painted nose, and an area located within 1000 ft downstream
Tobit model
The Tobit model was first proposed by Tobin (1958) for modeling the continuous dependent variable which is left-censored, right-censored, or both. Given that crash rates are usually left-censored at zero, Anastasopoulos et al. (2008) introduced the Tobit model into road safety evaluation. The Tobit model for fitting crash rates is given aswhere Yi is the dependent variable (observed values of crash rates), Xij is the jth (j = 1, 2,
Models estimation
Full Bayesian (FB) method has been advocated for model estimation as it can deal with sophisticated models, particularly for those do not have closed-form likelihood functions (Lord and Mannering, 2010). The specification of prior distribution of the model parameters are required before the FB estimates. To be specifically, the model parameters are coefficients (β0, βj) and variance in the IU-Tobit model; coefficients (, ) and covariance matrix ∑ in the MV-Tobit model;
Conclusions
This study evaluated the impact of various risk factors on crash rates of three collision types (i.e. rear-end, sideswipe, and angle) at freeway diverge areas by developing a RPMV-Tobit model. The model can accommodate jointly the correlation between crash rates across collision types and unobserved heterogeneity across observations, which are caused by the existence of unobserved risk factors that could jointly affect crash rates of different collision types. Data from 367 freeway diverge
Acknowledgement
This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71871057, 71701046, 6521000176,6521000160), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2242018R20003; 2242017K40130; YBJJ1533).
References (69)
- et al.
A Bayesian multivariate hierarchical spatial joint model for predicting crash counts by crash type at intersections and segments along corridors
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2018) Random parameters multivariate tobit and zero-inflated count data models: addressing unobserved and zero-state heterogeneity in accident injury-severity rate and frequency analysis
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
(2016)- et al.
Tobit analysis of vehicle accident rates on interstate highways
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2008) - et al.
A multivariate tobit analysis of highway accident-injury-severity rates
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2012) - et al.
A study of factors affecting highway accident rates using the random-parameters tobit model
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2012) - et al.
Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2009) - et al.
Safety performance evaluation of left-side off-ramps at freeway diverge areas
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2011) - et al.
Refined-scale panel data crash rate analysis using random-effects tobit model
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2014) - et al.
Analysis of hourly crash likelihood using unbalanced panel data mixed logit model and real-time driving environmental big data
J. Safety Res.
(2018) - et al.
Multivariate dynamic Tobit models with lagged observed dependent variables: an effectiveness analysis of highway safety laws
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2018)
Accident prediction models with random corridor parameters
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Collision prediction models using multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Exploring the transferability of safety performance functions
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Transferring and calibrating safety performance functions among multiple States
Accid. Anal. Prev.
A random thresholds random parameters hierarchical ordered probit analysis of highway accident injury-severities
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Analysis of accident injury-severity outcomes: the zero-inflated hierarchical ordered probit model with correlated disturbances
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Analysis of accident injury-severities using a correlated random parameters ordered probit approach with time variant covariates
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Analysis of vehicle accident-injury severities: a comparison of segment-versus accident-based latent class ordered probit models with class-probability functions
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Analysis of stationary and dynamic factors affecting highway accident occurrence: a dynamic correlated grouped random parameters binary logit approach
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections
Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.
Exploring unobserved heterogeneity in bicyclists’ red-light running behaviors at different crossing facilities
Accid. Anal. Prev.
A cross-comparison of different techniques for modeling macro-level cyclist crashes
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Evaluating factors affecting electric bike users’ registration of license plate in China using Bayesian approach
Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.
Temporal transferability and updating of zonal level accident prediction models
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Real-time crash prediction models: state-of-the-art, design pathways and ubiquitous requirements
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Did the 65 mph speed limit save lives?
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Analysis of crash proportion by vehicle type at traffic analysis zone level: a mixed fractional split multinomial logit modeling approach with spatial effects
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Using support vector machine models for crash injury severity analysis
Accid. Anal. Prev.
The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives
Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.
Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Types and characteristics of ramp-related motor vehicle crashes on urban interstate roadways in Northern Virginia
J. Safety Res.
The effect of long term non-invasive pavement deterioration on accident injury-severity rates: a seemingly unrelated and multivariate equations approach
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Simultaneous estimation of discrete outcome and continuous dependent variable equations: a bivariate random effects modeling approach with unrestricted instruments
Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
Effects of transit signal priority on traffic safety: interrupted time series analysis of Portland, Oregon, implementations
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Cited by (103)
Exploring the effect of mountainous terrain on weather-related crashes
2024, IATSS ResearchEstimating crash risk and injury severity considering multiple traffic conflict and crash types: A bivariate extreme value approach
2024, Analytic Methods in Accident ResearchGeographically weighted random forests for macro-level crash frequency prediction
2024, Accident Analysis and PreventionHow do people perceive driving risks in small towns? A case study in Central Texas
2023, Accident Analysis and PreventionExploring the efficiency optimization of channel integration in retail enterprises – Based on the perspective of path selection
2023, Electronic Commerce Research and ApplicationsA hybrid approach of random forest and random parameters logit model of injury severity modeling of vulnerable road users involved crashes
2023, Accident Analysis and Prevention