Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions
Introduction
Besides reduction in bone mineral density, there is growing evidence that bone fragility might be linked to the degradation of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the bone extracellular matrix (ECM) that is associated with alteration of the bone remodeling process and fatigue damage accumulation.3, 15 It has also become widely accepted that the bone ECM determines the mechanical environment of the osteocytes and bone lining cells, and may therefore play an important role in mechanotransduction. These issues call for a better understanding of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human bone ECM and their evolution with age and disease. The literature demonstrates a wide spectrum of studies that have focused on the characterization of intrinsic properties of bone tissue. Ascenzi and coworkers performed tension, compression, torsion, and bending tests of single osteons dissected from human bone and reported a strong dependence of Young’s modulus on average collagen fiber orientation and mineral content.1 Other investigators carried out microhardness tests2, 28 with imprint sizes of approximately 50 μm. Their results indicated a high correlation between microhardness and mineralization, anatomical site, Young’s modulus, yield strength, and tissue preparation. Surprisingly, Weaver did not observe a dependence of bone microhardness on donor, age, and osteoporosis.28 Based on microhardness tests, Hodgskinson et al. hypothesized that Young’s modulus for trabecular bone tissue and compact bone were comparable.10 Evans et al. and Ziv et al. found a strong dependence of bone tissue microhardness on collagen fiber and hydroxyapatite platelet orientation.6, 31 Unfortunately, hardness is a complex mechanical property that involves both elastic and postyield properties and cannot be easily converted to continuum-level properties such as Young’s modulus or shear strength. In addition, hardness can show a certain depth dependence, even for homogeneous materials.16
Another attractive technique for investigating the mechanical properties of individual bone structural units is ultrasound microscopy. The bone structural unit (BSU) represents the end result of a remodeling cycle; in cortical bone, it constitutes a haversian system (or cortical osteon) and, in cancellous bone, it is a wall or “packet” of bone (trabecular osteon).5 The experiments reported showed a relatively uniform acoustic reflectivity within each BSU, but significant differences between BSUs.12 However, acoustic reflectivity depends on both elastic properties and local material density, which makes the quantitative determination of Young’s modulus difficult.
Nanoindentation, which evolved from traditional Vickers microhardness testing, allows for measurement of mechanical properties at the nanometer scale. As a substantial improvement with respect to the aforementioned techniques, measured force displacement curves provide a local indentation modulus, a purely elastic property. The first nanoindentation studies applied on bone19, 20, 32 examined the influence of microstructure, drying, anatomical location, and age, and compared the mechanical properties of compact vs. trabecular bone. It was reported that drying increases Young’s modulus of compact bone by approximately 9%–16%, but does not change the relative stiffness of the bone constituents. For identical anatomical sites, interstitial bone showed the highest Young’s modulus, followed by osteonal bone, and then trabecular bone.
Further studies21, 23, 24 have investigated factors such as the anatomical orientation of the plane of indentation for vertebral and tibial bone and the site of indentation within secondary osteons. They measured significantly higher indentation moduli and hardness for compact and trabecular bone tissue tested in load-bearing directions with respect to transverse directions. Within single osteons, they observed a decrease of Young’s modulus with increasing distance to the haversian channel. Most of these studies reported indentations of 500–1000 nm depth, resulting in imprint sizes of 3–6 μm, and therefore test volumes exceeding the typical dimensions of single lamellae (typically 1–3 μm for thin lamellae and 2–4 μm for thick lamellae). In a recent study, thick lamellae were tested with a depth of 200 nm,23 but due to the difficulty in positioning the indenter tip in the submicron regime, no comparison between thick and thin lamellae was possible.
In an effort to extend our current knowledge of the mechanical properties of single bone lamellae, we sought to quantify the indentation modulus and hardness of both thin and thick lamellae selected from human trabecular and compact bone structural units (BSUs). The influence of lamella type (thick or thin) and indentation depth were examined under both dry and physiological conditions. For this purpose, we applied a combination of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and nanoindentation, which provided the required accuracy (better than 0.1 μm) to position the indenter tip in the center of a single lamella and perform reliable indentations with depths as low as 100 nm.
Section snippets
Technique
A more detailed description of the combined AFM and nanoindenter device (Hysitron, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) has been given in a recent publication.9 A Berkovich (three-sided pyramid) diamond tip is mounted on a transducer that allows for displacements in the z direction in nanoindentation mode. The sample is mounted on a scanner that allows for motion in the x,y-plane that is perpendicular to the tip axis. This combination allows for measuring both topography of the sample surface with a constant
Dry conditions
The comparisons of the AFM scans and light-microscope images showed that the thick lamellae corresponded to the peaks in the topography and the thin lamellae to the valleys. Typically, the topographical differences between thin and thick lamellae ranged between 50 and 130 nm. Thin lamellae showed a thickness of between <1 μm and 3 μm, whereas the thickness of the thick lamellae ranged between 2 μm and 4 μm. Figure 1 shows an AFM image after nanoindentation. The triangular marks are the
Discussion
The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of lamella type (thick and thin) and indentation depth on the indentation modulus of human bone ECM under dry and physiological conditions. According to our measurements on dry specimens, the lamellar number for each BSU was not significant. Rho et al.23 found a weak but significant decrease in indentation modulus of thick lamellae with increasing distance from the haversian channel and therefore reported a dependence on the lamellar
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge an E+R/B grant from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne. We also thank Eva Restle for helpful advice regarding statistical analysis.
References (33)
- et al.
Does microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone?
J Biomech
(1998) - et al.
Elastic moduli of human subchondral trabecular and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus
J Biomech
(1990) - et al.
Calcium buffering is required to maintain bone stiffness in saline solution
J Biomech
(1996) - et al.
Bone mineral density reflects bone mass but also the degree of mineralization of boneTherapeutic implications
Bone
(1997) - et al.
Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone materialUltrasonic and microtensile measurements
J Biomech
(1993) - et al.
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Biomaterials
(1997) - et al.
Variations in the individual thick lamellar properties within osteons by nanoindentation
Bone
(1999) The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile
Int J Eng Sci
(1965)- et al.
Buckling study of single human trabeculae
J Biomech
(1975) - et al.
Microstructure-microhardness relations in parallel-fibered and lamellar bone
Bone
(1996)
Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur
J Biomech
Morphology-mechanical property relations in trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic proximal tibia
J Arthroplasty
The micromechanics versus the macromechanics of cortical bone—A comprehensive presentation
J Biomech Eng
Investigations on some physical properties of bone tissue
Acta Anat
Bone Histomorphometry
Microhardness and Young’s modulus in cortical bone exhibiting a wide range of mineral volume fractions, and in a bone analogue
J Mater Sci Mater Med
Cited by (312)
Micromechanical modelling of transverse fracture behaviour of lamellar bone using a phase-field damage model: The role of non-collagenous proteins and mineralised collagen fibrils
2024, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsComparison of two contrast-enhancing staining agents for use in X-ray imaging and digital volume correlation measurements across the cartilage-bone interface
2024, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsFabrication of hydrophilic polymer-hybrid octacalcium phosphate blocks under wet condition based on cement setting reactions
2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsAn integrated experimental-computational framework to assess the influence of microstructure and material properties on fracture toughness in clinical specimens of human femoral cortical bone
2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsElasticity and material anisotropy of lamellar cortical bone in adult bovine tibia characterized via AFM nanoindentation
2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials