The effects of biofilm characteristics on the external mass transfer coefficient in a differential fluidized bed biofilm reactor

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(97)00010-7Get rights and content

Abstract

A differential fluidized bed biofilm reactor (DFBBR) was used for the first time to evaluate the external mass transfer coefficient of phenol for a spherical bioparticle of Pseudomonas putida. The reaction kinetics in the biofilm was maintained at first order and respective culture kinetic parameters were assessed from a set of continuous fermenter experiments. The fluidized bed was operated under nearly fixed hydrodynamic conditions such as bed porosity and fluidization rate to study only the effects of biofilm thickness and density on mass transfer. The mass transfer coefficient was calculated with the analytical solution of effectiveness factor for the bioparticle using density-dependent effective diffusion coefficient. The results of the study revealed that the mass transfer coefficient increased with biofilm thickness at decreasing biofilm density values, which could not have been predicted by correlations in the literature. This increase may be attributed to increasing porosity and roughness of the biofilm surface.

References (46)

  • T.C. Zhang et al.

    Density, porosity, and pore structure of biofilms

    Water Res.

    (1994)
  • H. Horn et al.

    Mass transfer coefficients for an autotrophic and a heterotrophic biofilm system

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1995)
  • A. Livingston et al.

    Modeling of phenol biodegradation in a fluidized-bed bioreactor

    AIChE J.

    (1989)
  • I. Anata et al.

    Oxygen transfer and culture characteristics of self-immobilized Solanum aviculare aggregates

    Biotech. Bioeng.

    (1995)
  • D. Patankar et al.

    Wall-growth hollow-fiber reactors for tissue culture: I. preliminary experiments

    Biotech. Bioeng.

    (1990)
  • C.P.L. Grady

    Modeling of biological fixed films: a state of the art review

  • J.F. Andrews

    Fluidized bed fermenters: a steady state analysis

    Biotech. Bioeng.

    (1982)
  • Y. Park et al.

    Analysis of a continuous aerobic, fixed-film bioreactor: I. steady state behavior

    Biotech. Bioeng.

    (1984)
  • H. Beyenal et al.

    The calculation of simultaneous effective diffusion coefficients of the substrates in a fluidized bed biofilm reactor

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1994)
  • H. Beyenal et al.

    Diffusion coefficients of phenol and oxygen in a biofilm of Pseudomonas putida

    AIChE J.

    (1997)
  • W.K. Shieh et al.

    Fluidized bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment

  • C.P.L. Grady et al.

    A conceptual model of RBC performance

  • C.P.L. Grady et al.

    Biological Wastewater Treatment: Theory and Applications

  • Cited by (26)

    • Modelling of biofilm growth for photosynthetic biomass production in a pipe-overflow recirculation bioreactor

      2019, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      For biological wastewater treatment, a mathematical model is used to predict the performance of a biological treatment process and to determine important variables and critical parameters or help with troubleshooting [9]. A model that describes the biofilm process must include the biological process in the biofilm, such as diffusion-reaction [10,11], biofilm growth, biofilm biodegradation [12], and/or absorption on activated carbon [13,14], which depends on the type of process under consideration. Although many studies have described biofilm formation using mathematical models, they were generally limited to certain factors, such as biofilm thickness, biofilm density, and biofilm decay [11].

    • Three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor modelling and simulation

      2017, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Symbols used in the mathematical model of the installation have been marked in this figure. Beyenal and Tanyolac [16] proved experimentally that the standard deviation of the mean biofilm thickness is sufficiently small to use a mean value in calculations. This assumption is applied in this work.

    • Determination of the external mass transfer coefficient and influence of mixing intensity in moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment

      2015, Water Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Within the biofilm, the substrates are transported by diffusion due the concentration gradient generated by the consumption of the pollutants. The external mass transfer resistance is usually described as a stagnant film between the bulk phase and the biofilm surface where all external mass transfer processes are included (Beyenal and Tanyolaç, 1998). One important factor which affects the external mass transfer to the biofilm is the mixing intensity within the reactor (Kugaprasatham et al., 1992; Chen et al., 2006).

    • Effects of mass transfer and light intensity on substrate biological degradation by immobilized photosynthetic bacteria within an annular fiber-illuminating biofilm reactor

      2014, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mathematical models for various configurations of the immobilized bioreactor, such as horizontal and vertical packed beds, fluidized beds, have been reported in the literatures [9,10]. Huang studied the mass transfer characteristics of the liquid film by taking into account the flow pattern and variation of liquid film thickness, but neglected substrate diffusion in fluid bulk zone [11,12]. Mowla established a diffusion–reaction model of biofilm, but they assumed substrate diffused only in the direction of the biofilm depth [13,14].

    • Effect of gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient and liquid-solid mass transfer resistance on phenol biodegradation in three phase inverse fluidized bed biofilm reactor

      2014, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      In phenol biodegradation processes, transfer rates of phenol, oxygen and other nutrients from bulk phase to bioparticle are the rate limiting steps which controls the performance of the reactor. Unfortunately studies on gas–liquid–solid mass transfer effects are very limited in IFBBRs [3–5]. The performance evaluation of IFBBR often requires the calculation of external mass transfer resistance to the biofilm.

    • Approximate analytical solution of the concentration of phenol and oxygen and rate of phenol degradation in fluidized bed bioreactor

      2012, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      A fluidized-bed bioreactor consists of microorganism coated particles suspended in wastewater which is sufficiently aerated to keep the gas, liquid and the solid particles thoroughly mixed. Biodegradation of phenol in fluidized bed bioreactors (FBRs) have been reported because of their superior performance and some inherent advantages [1–6]. The superior performance of FBR is due to very high concentration of immobilized cells on the solid particles, prevention of washout of the microbes, lack of clogging of the biomass, ease of separation of cells from product stream and elimination of limit on liquid flow rates due to decoupling of residence time of liquid phase and of microbial cells.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text