ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Academic Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 11, November 1998, Pages 766-770
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (2358 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80260-2    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1998 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Original investigation

Accuracy of CT biopsy: Laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques

MDF. Scott PerelesCorresponding Author Contact Information, MDMichael Baker, MDRobert Baldwin, PhDElizabeth Krupinski and MDEvan C. Unger

Department of Radiology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, USA

Received 21 November 1997; 
revised 21 January 1998. 
Available online 1 December 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Rationale and Objectives.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether laser-guided computed tomographic (CT) biopsy is more accurate than CT-guided biopsy with conventional freehand techniques.

Materials and Methods.

Two independent operators performed an equal number of freehand and laser-guided needle passes at varying single and double angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 25°/30°, and 25°/60°) on targets within six pork and beef phantoms. A total of 180 biopsy passes were performed, and error distances of needle tip to target were tabulated. Data were analyzed by means of repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the accuracy of laser guidance with freehand passes. ANOVA and correlation analysis were also used to confirm the relative equivalency of phantom targets and biopsy parameters.

Results.

Overall, laser-guided passes were statistically significantly more accurate than freehand passes. Mean error with laser guidance was 5.01 mm (standard error [SE] = 0.41 mm), whereas mean error with freehand techniques was 10.58 mm (SE = 0.82 mm) (F = 52.0, df = 1,17, P = .0001). Ninety-three percent of laser-guided passes and 56% of freehand passes were within 1 cm of the intended target. Error increased for both laser-guided and freehand techniques with larger angles or double-angle biopsies, but the increases were greater with free-hand technique. No statistically significant differences existed between the targets themselves or biopsy parameters for the two operators.

Conclusion.

Laser-guided CT biopsies were more accurate than freehand CT biopsies. Practical advantages of laser guidance over freehand CT biopsy methods may include decreased procedure times and reduced patient morbidity.

Key Words: Biopsies, technology; computed tomography (CT), guidance; lasers


Academic Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 11, November 1998, Pages 766-770
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.