Trends in Biochemical Sciences
ReviewLateral genomics
Section snippets
What we might lose
If lateral gene transfer can affect all genes, and has affected some substantial fraction of genes over the past 3.8 billion years (since the origin of life), then much of what molecular phylogeneticists have hoped to accomplish is at risk, especially in the area of prokaryote evolution. These researchers can establish genealogical relationships only through analyses of genes that organisms share by virtue of descent from common ancestors. Yet even strains of a single prokaryotic ‘species’ can
Reality checks
These are serious blows to molecular phylogenetics, and lateral gene transfer might owe as much of its current popularity to these iconoclastic consequences as to the weight of evidence. Many of the data are indeed ‘anecdotal’ – isolated cases of incongruent trees that alone might have other explanations and seem but a drop in the genomic ocean6, 7, 8. Many of the exhaustive comparisons of two or more genomes base their shocking conclusions on sequence similarity scores alone, not trees15, 17,
What’s to be gained?
How would science benefit by whole-hearted adoption of the notion that prokaryotic evolution should be viewed as net-like, not tree-like? What might we gain by focusing on how genes themselves have evolved and the role that transfer of genes has played in generating the pattern of diversity we see in the microbial world? Note that there still will be groups of related organisms. As long as species split into new species frequently with respect to the rate of loss or gain (by transfer) of new
A new synthesis
Phylogeneticists, genomicists, molecular biologists and population geneticists have different perspectives on prokaryote evolution, and their respective literatures on lateral gene transfer seem disconnected. Come the millennium, we could hope for more disciplinary interpenetration and a more sophisticated understanding of how life’s history is sometimes like a tree and sometimes like a net. An evolutionary model in which novel genes transferred between populations play a major role in
Acknowledgements
I thank the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research for a Fellowship, the Medical Research Council of Canada for research support, and Dave Faguy, John Logsdon, and Andrew Roger for stimulating discussions about lateral gene transfer.
References (32)
- et al.
Evolutionary anomalies among the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
(1998) - et al.
Archaeal genomics: do archaea have a mixed heritage?
Curr. Biol.
(1998) Evidence for massive gene exchange between archaeal and bacterial hyperthermophiles
Trends Genet.
(1998)Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(1998)Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
(1990)A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere
Science
(1997)Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree
Science
(1999)Evolution of the vacuolar H+-ATPase: implications for the origin of eukaryotes
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
(1989)Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
(1989)Gene duplications and horizontal gene transfers during early evolution