Elsevier

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals

Volume 11, Issues 1–3, January–March 2000, Pages 91-95
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals

Pfaffian solution for coupled discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(98)00272-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The Pfaffian solution for the coupled discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation is studied by using the direct method of soliton theory. The bilinear form of the equation contains a new Pfaffian identity. The Pfaffian representation of Toeplitz determinant is also derived.

Introduction

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS),itu=x2u+2uu*u,where * means complex conjugate, has several types of integrable discrete analogs. One of the simplest way to construct integrable discrete equations is the method of Miwa transformation which makes the correspondence of the independent variables keeping the structure of the solution space [1]. For NLS, this method yields, for instance [2],itun=un−1−un+unūnun−1,−itūn=ūn+1ūn+ūnunūn+1,oritun=un−11−un−1ūn+1−un,−itūn=ūn+11−ūn+1un−1ūn.However as is clearly seen, we cannot take ū as the complex conjugate of u in these equations. This inconsistency with the condition of complex conjugation (c.c.) comes from the incompatibility of the flows of time evolution and * operation in the solution space. On the other hand, more than two decades ago Ablowitz and Ladik proposed the discrete NLS which satisfies the c.c. condition [3],itunn2un+unu*n(un+1+un−1),where Δn is the central difference operator defined as ΔnFn=Fn+12−Fn−12.

They constructed the above equation by using the inverse scattering method which automatically keeps the c.c. symmetry in this case. It is known that the solution of this equation is given in terms of the Toeplitz determinant [4], which means that after all the appropriate choice of the independent variable one recovers the c.c. symmetry.

However in the case of coupled equations, the situation is completely different. The coupled NLS,ituk=x2uk+2∑l=1Mulul*uk1⩽k⩽Mis the integrable multicomponent generalization of NLS. The usual discretization of this equation again breaks the c.c. symmetry. Even starting from Eq. (1), the natural multicomponent generalization based on the inverse scattering method gives the following coupled equations [5],itunkn2unk+l=1Munlūnl(un+1k+un−1k)−l=1M(un−1kunl−un−1lunk)ūnl1⩽k⩽M−itūnkn2ūnk+l=1Munlūnl(ūn+1k+ūn−1k)−l=1M(ūn+1kūnlūn+1lūnk)unl1⩽k⩽Mwhich is incompatible with the condition ū=u*. Thus in the coupled case, it is not so clear how to construct the discrete analogs.

Recently another coupled discrete NLS (cdNLS) satisfying the c.c. condition was proposed [5],itunkn2unk+∑l=1Munlunl*(un+1k+un−1k)1⩽k⩽M.The purpose of this paper is to investigate the structure of the solution space of this cdNLS system. We show that the solution of Eq. (2) is given in terms of the Pfaffian with new difference structure. It is also shown that the Pfaffian gives a kind of generalization of the Toeplitz determinant. The integrability of Eq. (2) follows from the fact that the Pfaffian solution includes M arbitrary functions satisfying the dispersion relation.

Section snippets

New algebraic identity of Pfaffian

We denote the (i,j) element of Pfaffian simply as (i,j). We have the asymmetric condition: (i,j)=−(j,i) for any i and j. We also use the conventional notation of the linear combination of index,(α+β,γ)=(α,γ)+(β,γ),(α,β+γ)=(α,β)+(α,γ),(cα,β)=(α,cβ)=c(α,β).

Theorem 1 New bilinear identity of Pfaffian

Assuming the difference rule for the elements of Pfaffian,(i(n+1),j(m+1))=(i(n),j(m))+(i(n+1),h0)(j(m),h0)−(j(m+1),h0)(i(n),h0)then the τ function defined by the Pfaffian,τN1N2…NMn=(SN1−11(n),…,S1(n),1(n),SN2−12(n),…,S2(n),2(n),…,SNM−1M(n),…,SM

Pfaffian solution for cdNLS

Now we introduce the time evolution in the above τ function.

Theorem 2 Bilinear equations of cdNLS

Imposing the differential rule for the elements of Pfaffian in Theorem 1,t(i(n),j(m))=(i(n+1),h0)(j(m−1),h0)−(j(m+1),h0)(i(n−1),h0)t(i(n),h0)=(i(n+1),h0)−(i(n−1),h0)then the τ function satisfies the bilinear equation,DtτN1⋯Nk+1⋯NMn·τN1⋯NMnN1⋯Nk+1⋯NMn+1τN1⋯NMn−1−τN1⋯Nk+1⋯NMn−1τN1⋯NMn+11⩽k⩽M.

Proof

[7]

By using the elementary properties of Pfaffian,(1,2,…,2N,a,b)=(1,2,…,2N)(a,b)−1⩽i<j⩽2NΓij(i,a)(j,b)−(j,a)(i,b),x(1,2,⋯,2N)=1⩽i<j⩽2NΓijx(i,j),

Concluding remarks

We have shown that the solution of cdNLS (2) is given by the Pfaffian (4) whose elements satisfy , . The solution of the single component discrete NLS (1) is described by the Toeplitz determinant and the classification of the equation in the KP hierarchy is clear. However to satisfy the condition of complex conjugation in the multicomponent case, we need to change the structure of the solution space completely, switching from Toeplitzs determinant to the Pfaffians by using the algebraic

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his sincere thanks to Prof. Ablowitz, Prof. Herbst and Dr. Trubatch for their valuable discussions. The present work is based on the results obtained in the collaboration with them. He is also grateful to Prof. Hirota, Prof. Nakamura, Dr. Tsujimoto and Dr. Iwao for their discussions and comments.

References (9)

  • T. Miwa

    Proc. Jpn. Acad.

    (1982)
  • E. Date et al.

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.

    (1983)
  • M.J. Ablowitz et al.

    Stud. Appl. Math.

    (1976)
  • R. Hirota, unpublished...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Hybrid solutions for the (2+1)-dimensional variable-coefficient Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Kotera-Sawada equation in fluid mechanics

    2021, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
    Citation Excerpt :

    For the insight into the fluid mechanics problems, people have focused their attention on the analytic solutions of the NLEEs [10,13,15,17–19]. Researchers have proposed certain methods for solving the NLEEs, such as the Darboux transformation, Bäcklund transformation, inverse scattering transformation, Lie group, consistent Riccati expansion, Pfaffian technique and Hirota bilinear methods [18–27]. Among them, the Pfaffian technique has been used to construct the soliton solutions, breather solutions, lump solutions and hybrid solutions [20,21].

  • Exact solutions to a coupled modified KdV equations with non-uniformity terms

    2009, Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
  • Pfaffianization of the variable-coefficient KP equation

    2009, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
    Citation Excerpt :

    The key points involved in this procedure, which we now call Pfaffianization, are to first express N-soliton solutions of an un-Pfaffianized equation in the form of Wronskian, Casorati or Grammian type determinant, then to replace the determinant with a Pfaffian whose elements satisfy the Pfaffianized form of the dispersion relation given in the determinant solutions of the un-Pfaffianized equation, and finally to construct a new coupled system whose solutions are these Pfaffians. Recently, much attention has been paid to the Pfaffian solutions of the NEEs [10–18]. For example, the Pfaffianization procedure has been successfully applied to the Davey–Stewartson equations [10], the discrete KP equation [11], the self-dual Yang–Mills equation [12], the KP hierarchies [13], the two-dimensional Toda lattice [14], the semi-discrete Toda equation [15] and the differential–difference KP equation [16].

  • Soliton solutions to a higher order Ito equation: Pfaffian technique

    2007, Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
  • Soliton solutions of a coupled Ramani equation

    2006, Applied Mathematics Letters
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text