ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (635 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0955-5986(98)00010-7    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

Gas holdup distributions in large-diameter bubble columns measured by computed tomography

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Jinwen Chena, Puneet Guptaa, Sujatha Degaleesana, Muthanna H. Al-Dahhana, *, Milorad P. DudukoviImage a and Bernard A. Toselandb

a Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Campus Box 1198, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, St Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA

b Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., P.O. Box 25780, Lehigh Valley, PA 18007, USA


Received 12 September 1997;
revised 11 December 1997;
accepted 19 February 1998.
Available online 24 November 1998.

Abstract

Using the computed tomography (CT) and computer automated radioactive particle tracking (CARPT) facilities at the Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratory (CREL), time-averaged gas holdup distributions and liquid recirculation velocities were measured in a 44 cm diameter bubble column for air–water and air–drakeoil systems at 2, 5, and 10 cm/s superficial gas velocities, which cover bubbly, transition and churn-turbulent flow regimes, respectively. Gas holdup was found to increase only slightly with the increase in axial distance from the distributor, but increased significantly with the increase in superficial gas velocity, as expected. A lower gas holdup was observed in the air–drakeoil system than in the air–water system. This could be predominantly attributed to the formation of large bubbles in the former case due to the higher viscosity of drakeoil (approximately 0.03 Pas (=30 cp)). At high superficial gas velocities, the time-averaged cross-sectional gas holdup distributions were almost symmetric for both air–water and air–drakeoil systems. However, at 2 cm/s superficial gas velocity, an asymmetry in the holdup distribution was observed, which manifested itself in an asymmetric liquid recirculation pattern. At all gas velocities, the radial gas holdup distribution for the air–water system was steeper than that for the air–drakeoil system, yielding steeper radial liquid velocity profiles. Comparison of the gas holdup obtained in the 44 cm diameter column and that obtained in a 10 cm diameter column is discussed.

Author Keywords: bubble column; computed tomography; gas holdup; liquid recirculation

Index Terms: Bubble columns; Computerized tomography; Velocity; Air; Water; Turbulent flow; Performance; Gas holdup

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. CT scanner and CARPT facility
2.1. CT scanner
2.2. Basic principle of tomography
2.3. CARPT facility
3. Experimental setup and conditions
4. Experimental results and discussion
4.1. Reproducibility of CT measurements
4.2. Cross-sectional gas holdup distribution
4.3. Radial gas holdup distribution
4.4. Representation of radial gas holdup distribution
4.5. Effects of gas holdup distribution on liquid recirculation
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References












*Corresponding author. Tel: +1 314 935 6082; Fax: +1 314 935 7211.


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.