ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Knowledge-Based Systems
Volume 13, Issue 6, 1 November 2000, Pages 361-368
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (154 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00076-9    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

A computational framework for concept formation for a situated design agent

J. S. GeroCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a and H. Fujiib

a Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Department of Architectural and Design Science, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006 Australia b Department of Architecture, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1 Tokyo 140-0012 Japan

Received 22 June 2000;
accepted 22 June 2000.
Available online 29 November 2000.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper takes the approach that designing is situated and that concepts are formed as a consequence of the situatedness of designing. The paper presents a framework for concept formation that draws on a structure of a design agent that includes sensors, perceptors and conceptors that interact with each other and the external and internal environment of the agent to produce the situation that is a contingent basis for the formation and use of concepts.

Author Keywords: Concept formation; Situatedness; Design agent

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Designing, action, and concept
2.1. Designing and action
2.2. Action and concept
2.3. Designing and concept
3. Framework for concept formation
3.1. Exogenesis and autogenesis
3.2. Processes enabling concept formation
3.2.1. Sensation
3.2.2. Perception
3.2.3. Conception
3.2.4. Perception–conception recursion
3.2.4.1. Perception.
3.2.4.2. Conception.
3.2.4.3. Hypothesizing.
3.2.4.4. Expectation.
3.2.5. Action
3.3. Phenomena explained by the proposed framework
3.3.1. Emergence of self-learning organization
3.3.2. Reinterpreting a situation
4. A semi-computational framework
4.1. Variables
4.2. Processes
4.2.1. Sensation
4.2.1.1. Exogenous sensation process (fse).
4.2.1.2. Autogenous sensation process (fsa).
4.2.2. Perception and conception
4.2.2.1. Perception (fp).
4.2.2.2. Conception (fc).
4.2.2.3. Expectation (fe).
4.2.2.4. Hypothesizing (ff).
4.2.3. Memory management
4.2.3.1. SOA-Memory construction (fmc-soa).
4.2.3.2. COE-memory construction (fmc-coe).
4.2.3.3. SOA-Memory retrieval (fmr-soa).
4.2.3.4. COE-Memory retrieval (fmr-coe).
4.2.3.5. Memory introspection (fmi).
4.2.4. Action
4.2.4.1. Devising (fa).
4.2.4.2. External effect (gae).
4.2.4.3. Internal effect (gaa).
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References


Knowledge-Based Systems
Volume 13, Issue 6, 1 November 2000, Pages 361-368
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.