Building Design Advisor: automated integration of multiple simulation tools

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00043-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The Building Design Advisor (BDA) is a software environment that supports the integrated use of multiple analysis and visualization tools throughout the building design process, from the initial, conceptual and schematic phases to the detailed specification of building components and systems. Based on a comprehensive design theory, the BDA uses an object-oriented representation of the building and its context, and acts as a data manager and process controller to allow building designers to benefit from the capabilities of multiple tools.

The BDA provides a graphical user interface that consists of two main elements: the Building Browser and the Decision Desktop. The Browser allows building designers to quickly navigate through the multitude of descriptive and performance parameters addressed by the analysis and visualization tools linked to the BDA. Through the Browser the user can edit the values of input parameters and select any number of input and/or output parameters for display in the Decision Desktop. The Desktop allows building designers to compare multiple design alternatives with respect to multiple descriptive and performance parameters addressed by the tools linked to the BDA.

The BDA is implemented as a Windows®-based application for personal computers. Its initial version is linked to a Schematic Graphic Editor (SGE), which allows designers to quickly and easily specify the geometric characteristics of building components and systems. For every object created in the SGE, the BDA activates a Default Value Selector (DVS) mechanism that selects ‘smart’ default values from a Prototypes Database for all non-geometric parameters required as input to the analysis and visualization tools linked to the BDA. In addition to the SGE that is an integral part of its user interface, the initial version of the BDA is linked to a daylight analysis tool, an energy analysis tool, and a multimedia, Web-based Case Studies Database (CSD). The next version of the BDA will be linked to additional analysis tools, such as the DOE-2 (thermal, energy and energy cost) and RADIANCE (day/lighting and rendering) computer programs. Plans for the future include the development of links to cost estimating and environmental impact modules, building rating systems, CAD software and electronic product catalogs.

References (7)

  • B.E. Birdsall et al.

    Overview of the DOE-2 building energy analysis program

  • F.C. Winkelmann et al.

    DOE-2 Supplement: Version 2.1E

  • M. Modest

    A general model for the calculation of daylighting in interior spaces

    Energy and Buildings

    (1982)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (40)

  • Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance

    2018, Automation in Construction
    Citation Excerpt :

    A large body of research exists that couples parametric building modeling, environmental simulation and optimization. The study of Gero et al. [5] and the Building Design Advisor [6] represent early, integrated design approaches combining multiple analysis and visualization tools. Caldas and Norford [7] utilize genetic algorithms to search for optimized environmental design solutions, focusing on façade configurations.

  • Development of an automated modeler of environment and energy geographic information (E-GIS) for ecofriendly city planning

    2016, Automation in Construction
    Citation Excerpt :

    As a tool for integrating space modeling, environment and energy analysis, and evaluation and feedback, at the site level, Melo et al. [25] constructed a Google SketchUp plug-in to evaluate the irradiation environment on the urban surface and to deduce the PV design from the 3D solar modeling. At the building level, Papamichael et al. [26] suggested a computing environment that connects space planning, sunlight, and energy analysis by linking DOE-2 with the RADIANCE tool. With respect to decision-making or evaluation tools for space modeling, at the urban level, Johnston et al. [27] created an environmental modeler to collect environmental data, automatically standardize the data, perform simulations, and validate the simulations for bio-habitat planning support and Carlon et al. [28] constructed a GIS-based S/W incorporated with multi-criteria analysis using a scenario decision module to evaluate urban environment and technical risk.

  • Evolutionary energy performance feedback for design: Multidisciplinary design optimization and performance boundaries for design decision support

    2014, Energy and Buildings
    Citation Excerpt :

    Examples of these efforts can be found in data model and process standardizations [39–41], along with collaborative framework developments. A selection of the representative efforts is found here [26,42–50]. In summary, these efforts focus on collaborative frameworks to overcome interoperability between expert domains and to facilitate the inclusion of performance feedback.

  • Designing-in performance: A framework for evolutionary energy performance feedback in early stage design

    2014, Automation in Construction
    Citation Excerpt :

    One focus has been on the interoperability issue among software and different domain expertise. Examples of these efforts can be found in data model and process standardization [15–17] along with collaborative framework development [18–22]. While solutions to interoperability would ease in the generation and evaluation of design alternatives, it is arguably insufficient [23] and cannot fulfill all the identified requirements for “designing-in performance” in early stage conceptual design.

  • Simulation and evaluation of building information modeling in a real pilot site

    2014, Applied Energy
    Citation Excerpt :

    They were designed to be used by research scientists. Usage of these tools generally requires a steep learning curve and as a consequence these tools are mainly used by domain experts [25]. “Simulation tools are neither used to support the generation of design alternatives nor to make informed choices between different design options, and they are neither used for building and/or system optimization” [26].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text