ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Neurocomputing
Volume 55, Issues 1-2, September 2003, Pages 79-108
Support Vector Machines
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (551 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00380-1    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

A geometric approach to support vector regression

Jinbo BiCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Kristin P. Bennett

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA

Received 14 March 2002; 
accepted 8 January 2003. ;
Available online 22 May 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

We develop an intuitive geometric framework for support vector regression (SVR). By examining when var epsilon-tubes exist, we show that SVR can be regarded as a classification problem in the dual space. Hard and soft var epsilon-tubes are constructed by separating the convex or reduced convex hulls, respectively, of the training data with the response variable shifted up and down by var epsilon. A novel SVR model is proposed based on choosing the max-margin plane between the two shifted data sets. Maximizing the margin corresponds to shrinking the effective var epsilon-tube. In the proposed approach, the effects of the choices of all parameters become clear geometrically. The kernelized model corresponds to separating the convex or reduced convex hulls in feature space. Generalization bounds for classification can be extended to characterize the generalization performance of the proposed approach. We propose a simple iterative nearest-point algorithm that can be directly applied to the reduced convex hull case in order to construct soft var epsilon-tubes. Computational comparisons with other SVR formulations are also included.

Author Keywords: Support vector machines; Kernel methods; Regression; Nearest-point algorithms

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. When does the ε-tube exist?
3. Constructing the hard ε-tube
4. Constructing the soft ε-tube
5. Kernelizing H-SVR and RH-SVR
6. Characterizing RH-SVR
7. Analyzing generalization performance
8. The nearest-point algorithm
8.1. Optimality conditions
8.2. The algorithm
9. Experimental studies
10. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Appendix
References
Vitae










Neurocomputing
Volume 55, Issues 1-2, September 2003, Pages 79-108
Support Vector Machines
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.