Crime-Related Trauma: Psychological Distress in Victims of Bankrobbery
Section snippets
Subjects
Two groups of employees of a major commercial bank in the Netherlands participated in this study. One group consisted of subjects who had experienced a bank robbery and worked in high-frequency bankrobbery areas. The other (control) group consisted of nonrobbed employees, who were matched on basis of identical high-risk contact services (i.e., cashier, desk personnel, minor branch manager) and were working in the same high-risk areas.
Three-hundred and twenty-eight victims returned their
Results
Table 1 shows the means and standard deviations of the victimized employees and the control group on the personality scales and symptom checklist (SCL-90-R). As expected, victimized subjects displayed more signs of psychological distress than the control subjects (SCL-90-R; t = 4.48, p < .000). No differences were found between the groups on the personality variables extraversion, self-esteem, and locus of control. However, the victimized group had higher neuroticism scores than the control
Discussion
The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, employees who had experienced a hold-up evidenced significantly higher psychological distress than their nonvictimized colleagues. Within the group of held-up employees, an association was found between the time elapsed since the robbery and their current level of psychological distress. Although the cross-sectional design of the study precludes definite conclusions, these findings suggest significant psychological distress
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the RABO bank. The views expressed in this paper are solely the views of the authors and do necessarily reflect those of the RABO bank. The authors would like to express their appreciation to Jules Borghouts, Gerrie Klok, Frans van Slagmaat, and Jan Hageraats of the RABO health department.
References (39)
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(1994)Handleiding bij de Delftse Vragenlijst
(1975)- et al.
Victims of rapeRepeated assessment of depressive symptoms
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
(1982) - et al.
Coping with victimization by technological disaster
Journal of Social Issues
(1983) - et al.
Traumatic events and post-traumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults
Archives of General Psychiatry
(1991) - et al.
Posttraumatic stress reactions in volunteer firefighters
Journal of Traumatic Stress
(1996) - et al.
Posttrauma reactions following a multiple shootingA retrospective study and methodological inquiry
- et al.
Diagnostic issues in posttraumatic stress disorderConsideration for the DSM-IV
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
(1991) SCL90Administration, scoring, and procedures manual-I for the (revised) version
(1977)- Fairbank, J. A., Schlenger, W. E., Caddell, J. M., & Woods, M. G. (1995). Post-traumatic stress disorder. In P. B....
A causal model ofthe etiology of warrelated PTSD
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Understanding acute psychological distress following natural disaster
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Towards an understanding of the psychological impact of natural disastersAn application of the Conservation Resources Stress Model
Journal of Traumatic Stress
The victims perspective
Factors in the victim that mediate between disaster and psychopathologyA review
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Identifying survivors at riskTrauma and stressors across events
Risk factors for PTSD and other diagnoses in a general sample of Vietnam veterans
American Journal of Psychiatry
Five psychosocial variables related to the existence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Conservation of resourcesA new attempt at conceptualizing stress
American Psychologist
Cited by (55)
Investigating the psychological impact of bank robbery: A cohort study
2014, Journal of Anxiety DisordersCitation Excerpt :However, all of the studies have been based on convenience samples, and only one study can be regarded as having a large sample (N = 303) (Kamphuis & Emmelkamp, 1998). Moreover, only one cross-sectional study has included a control group of employees never exposed to robbery in which a higher degree of distress was found in the robbery group (Kamphuis & Emmelkamp, 1998). Across studies, no attempts were made to statistically control the existing differences between the groups.
Assessing the risk of robbery in bank branches to reduce impact on personnel
2022, Risk AnalysisInterviewing adult complainants in sexual assault cases
2021, Criminal Investigations of Sexual Offenses: Techniques and ChallengesCriminal victimization, cognitive social capital and mental health in an urban region in Germany: a path analysis
2021, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology