Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 187, Issues 1–2, January 2004, Pages 44-50
Hearing Research

Round window pH manipulation alters the ototoxicity of systemic cisplatin

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00330-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of manipulation of pH on the ototoxicity of systemic cisplatin was studied in Wistar rats. After control auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were performed, the auditory bullae were opened and acidic (pH 6.0), neutral (pH 7.4) or basic (pH 9.0) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was applied to fill the round window niche (RWN). After 30 min, 13 mg/kg cisplatin solution or saline was administered intraperitoneally. After 3 days, follow-up ABRs were performed and cochleae were processed for morphological analysis. Animals that received basic PBS on the RWN and cisplatin intraperitoneally had significantly smaller ABR threshold shifts compared to rats pretreated with neutral pH buffer (P<0.05). Animals that received acidic PBS on the RWN and systemic cisplatin showed significantly greater ABR threshold shifts compared to those pretreated with neutral pH buffer (P<0.05). No significant threshold changes were observed in animals that received buffer of any pH on the RWN, followed by saline intraperitoneally. Semiquantitative analysis of hair cell survival confirmed a protective effect by basic PBS against cisplatin and a synergistic effect by acidic PBS on cisplatin ototoxicity (P<0.05). It appears that changes in cochlear pH can modulate the ototoxic effects of systemically applied cisplatin.

Introduction

Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum) is an antineoplastic agent that is widely used against a variety of neoplasms. High dose cisplatin produces severe dose-limiting side effects, such as nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression and ototoxicity (Piel et al., 1974, Rybak, 1981, Fausti et al., 1999).

The antineoplastic efficacy of cisplatin is known to be affected by pH. Groos et al. (1986) reported increased cytotoxicity of cisplatin under acidic conditions, and decreased cytotoxicity under alkaline conditions in transitional carcinoma cells in vitro. Atema et al. (1993) reported the potentiation of cisplatin cytotoxicity in mouse leukemia cells in acidic conditions. Laurencot et al. (1995) also reported that acidic conditions potentiate the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in mouse mammary tumor cells. We previously reported that the ototoxicity of locally applied cisplatin is inhibited by the local application of basic phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and potentiated by acidic PBS in the chinchilla (Tanaka et al., 2003). In the present study, we investigated the effects of locally applied PBS of variable pH on the ototoxicity of systemically applied cisplatin using the rat.

Section snippets

Animals

Twenty healthy male rats (207–342 g), free of external or middle ear pathology, were used in this study. At the time of application of solutions to the round window niche (RWN), no scar tissue or other pathology was noted. All animals had free access to commercial food and water and were maintained in an environment with controlled temperature and 12 h light–dark cycles. All procedures of this study were approved by the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Laboratory Animal Care and

ABRs

In group 1, the animals received basic PBS on one RWN and neutral PBS on the opposite RWN and cisplatin intraperitoneally. The ABR threshold changes for the neutral PBS ears were 18.3±3.1, 20.0±5.8, 16.7±4.9, 18.3±6.5, 31.7±6.0 and 36.7±8.4 dB (mean±S.E.M.) for click, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 kHz, respectively. The threshold shifts for basic PBS ears were 5.0±5.0, 6.7±4.9, 3.3±2.1, 5.0±3.4, 13.3±5.6 and 15.0±6.7 dB for click, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 kHz, respectively (Fig. 1). There were significant

Discussion

We previously reported that locally applied basic PBS could protect against the ototoxicity of locally applied cisplatin and locally applied acidic PBS could potentiate the ototoxicity of cisplatin applied to the round window (Tanaka et al., 2003). Because cisplatin is a low molecular weight (MW) compound (300), we expected it to readily cross the round window membrane. Low MW compounds can freely cross the round window (Juhn et al., 1989, Okuno and Nomura, 1984), while the passage of higher MW

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health NIH (NIDCD) Grant RO1 DC02396.

References (30)

  • F. Bertolero et al.

    Changes in renal handling of platinum in cisplatinum-treated rats following induction of met abolic acidosis or alkalosis

    Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol.

    (1982)
  • Q. Chau et al.

    Cisplatin efflux, binding and intracellular pH in the HTB56 human lung adenocarcinoma cell line and the E-8/0.7 cisplatin-resistant variant

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1999)
  • A. Ekborn et al.

    Ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and its monohydrated complex in the guinea pig

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (2003)
  • S.A. Fausti et al.

    An individualized, sensitive frequency range for early detection of ototoxicity

    Ear Hear.

    (1999)
  • M.V. Goycoolea

    Clinical aspects of round window membrane permeability under normal and pathological conditions

    Acta Otolaryngol.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Differential localizations of the myo-inositol transporters HMIT and SMIT1 in the cochlear stria vascularis

      2018, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Acute acidification of endolymph by experimental techniques reduces the EP of the endolymph [9,21]. In a study of the effects of administration of acidic or basic saline on the round window of cochlea in animals receiving cisplatin, ototoxicity is increased under acidic conditions and decreased under alkaline conditions [25]. Consistently, metabolic acidosis and impairment of cochlea pH regulation are associated with hearing loss.

    • Hearing loss associated with enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct: Mechanistic insights from clinical phenotypes, genotypes, and mouse models

      2011, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the acidification of cochlear endolymph may contribute to the loss of the endocochlear potential by enhancing oxidative stress through acid-activation of the K+ channel KCNQ1 (Unsold et al., 2000) and an increase in the rate of transepithelial K+ secretion across stria marginal cells, which would be associated with an increase in metabolism (Singh and Wangemann, 2008). Indeed, the endocochlear potential is reduced by experimental maneuvers that lead to an acute acidification of cochlear fluids (Ikeda et al., 1987a; Sterkers and Saumon, 1984) and acidification of cochlear fluids has been shown to increase free radical stress, whereas alkalinization has a protective effect on hearing (Tanaka et al., 2004). The luminal acidification and the loss of the endocochlear potential may jointly contribute to the approximately 100-fold elevation in the endolymphatic Ca2+ concentration (Ikeda et al., 1987b; Wangemann et al., 2007).

    • Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses sensitivity assessment in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in rats

      2009, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anther variable parameter is the type of stimuli used. Most of the authors prefer the tone burst, with or without clicks22,28,29,33,37,42, 44–50, 52, 53. The tone burst has the advantage of assessing hearing in a frequency-specific way.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text