ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Forest Ecology and Management
Volume 154, Issue 3, 1 December 2001, Pages 431-441
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (111 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00513-8    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

A financial analysis of rain forest silviculture in southwestern Sri Lanka

Mark S. AshtonCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a, Robert Mendelsohna, B. M. P. Singhakumarab, C. V. S. Gunatillekec, I. A. U. N. Gunatillekec and Alexander Evansa

a School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 360 Prospects Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA b Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Sri Jayawardenapura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka c Department of Botany, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

Available online 30 October 2001.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

We examine the financial aspects of three silvicultural systems to encourage the sustainability of valuable hardwood species in mixed-dipterocarp forests of southwest Sri Lanka. We compare the net present value (NPV) of the current forest management approach (diameter limit harvests) with shelterwood harvests that promote light hardwood timber species. In this analysis, we also consider the potential of enrichment planting various precious timber (Diospyros quaesita — calamander), and non-timber forest product (NTFP) species (Caryota urens — fishtail palm; Elettaria cardamomum var. major — cardamom; Calamus zeylanicus — rattan) in conjunction with timber harvests. Two real (inflation adjusted) discount rates were used, 4 and 6%, respectively. Results show that when real discount rates are low (4%), and advance regeneration is present, NPV is highest for the one-cut shelterwood (US $9983 ha−1). At a high discount rate (6%), reflecting the current short-term concession system and unstable rights to harvest, and where no advance regeneration was present, the diameter limit system (US $7173 ha−1) was the optimum. On sites with advanced regeneration, the one-cut shelterwood system is clearly preferable. For all but rattan, shelterwood treatments provide higher NPVs for NTFPs than diameter limit cuttings primarily because of the higher light regimes and more growing space made available early in the rotation. The value for tea cultivation (US $26,000 ha−1) far exceeds the value of managing these lands for timber alone, explaining the dramatic expansion in tea plantations on private lands. However, our results suggest that managing these lands for a combination of timber and enrichment plantings of NTFPs (US $23,000 ha−1) can be comparable to tea plantations. By managing for NTFPs and timber, forest managers have new opportunities to solve the old problems of high-grading and land-use conversion.

Author Keywords: Calamus zeylanicus; Caryota urens; Cardamom; Dipterocarps; Elettaria cardamomum var. major; Enrichment planting; Light hardwoods; Non-timber forest products; Rattan; Shorea spp.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Site description
3. Method of economic analysis
4. Results
4.1. Timber production
4.2. Enrichment planting
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References

Forest Ecology and Management
Volume 154, Issue 3, 1 December 2001, Pages 431-441
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.